realdoyle wrote:
Honestly I am starting to get frustrated with these comments pertaining to my lack of preparation. I completely acknowledge that I am not an expert in studio construction, I am not even a good handyman, or even great with math. I am a professional musician (college educated and trained) and that is my expertise. I tried to do the best research I could (for two months prior to starting any construction). I bought two books that got good reviews (including Gervais') and consulted a seemingly well-respected "studio construction professional" here in LA who charges $500 an hour for his consultation (one phone consult and one in person where I showed him my blueprints).
Not only have a I have found my professional consultation advice to be conflicting to the "expert" advice I find on here but I flat out can't even find straight answers to the questions I do ask.
I feel your pain boss. It is difficult to build, as anyone with any amount of time in the field will tell you and it is difficult times 10 to do it for an acoustical environment...as anyone who has done it will also attest.
I do not know what questions you have asked that have not been answered. I can say this. Rod Gervias is the author of a book that many say is a bible of sorts for doing this type of building. Madmax [xamdam] is a highly qualified construction technician in his own right and he is the GC[general contractor] of a high dollar and highly visible studio in North Carolina. Maybe the best that his part of the country will see.
Building, as a rule, is not a simple thing that people talk about and then do. I have been in commercial and residential building for over thirty years and still have to ask questions and read up on things as they tend[ the things that are part of construction] change all the time.
You can confuse terms easily in this business. As you are doing right now saying "vapor barrier".
The house wrap is not a vapor "barrier". It is a retarder
:) And there is a large difference between what the one does versus what the other does.
Your retarder is fine, could be better, but it will work as is.
realdoyle wrote:
"...that people starting mentioning beefing up the outer layer."
Actually, you asked about it. I think we can all get on board that the addition of layers is a good idea supported by documentation. What would have been better, had you paid us the money rather then spending it outside of this forum, that the EXTERIOR of the structure needs the most or at least equal mass....contiguous or unbroken.
Then there is the air space that suffers due to the addition of mass behind the exterior sheathing/siding. The air space is as important as the mass. You mentioned using RC. This is fine if this is what you want to do. But there are other ways that you could do this job that will get the isolation you require.
Even a simple study on RC will reveal that the low frequency will suffer and this is not the part of your isolation that you want to have a leak in with drums.
There are many trade-offs. This is why it is so important to begin with a firm foundation.
Have you ever built a house? The details can, as a builder, cost you any profit if it exists these days. So as a D.I.Yer, to suggest that you can get an isolated acoustic environment constructed without any errors...without any technical ability on your behalf, is pie in the sky.
realdoyle wrote:
"His build is an 8 foot X 12 foot X 16 foot...at least one dimension is divisible by another."
I already knew before I started that my 8ft ceilings were a multiple of the 16ft length and this is bad.
Not bad, just something to avoid in the early phases of development if at all possible. It can be overcome. Remember, this is just a small room in your backyard, not a multi-million dollar exercise in acoustics.
realdoyle wrote:
So far in this one post I've had 3 different solutions to my problem and all of them claim to be the best, considering the situation:
1) Add mass between the studs. (which Rod and xSpace endorse)
2) Tear down the siding and start over. (xSpace thinks would be a waste, considering)
3) Leave the siding and add more mass to the outside. (vapor barrier/mold issues???)
These are not three different items, but choices to different degrees.
realdoyle wrote:
realdoyle wrote:
"I think he should tear the whole thing down to the slab But there has to be a point where you learn the lessons that haste teachs and you move forward."
I honestly made a significant effort to be prepared for this project. I get the feeling you think I am trigger happy and can't wait to make my next error.
:) In hindsight I don't know I how else I could've prepared. Even though my plans were not the best I made the effort to educate myself and get expert advice. How else could I have known it wasn't ready?
You have a few months in preparation. Many come here with this same notion. Personally, it is a disrespect to builders world wide in my point of view that people think they can D.I.Y. a building and not have any experience what-so-ever in building. It is, to me, the same as me thinking I can jump up on the stage at Carnegie Hall and play to a high caliber of execution on my musical instrument when I have only read a book or two about it and practiced for a few weeks.
Understand what I am saying?
realdoyle wrote:
I am grateful for all of your advice. I truly am. But sometimes I think you forget that even though you see this as a black and white science, it is all too often painted in a lot of grey. I'm just trying to sort it all out and make the best of it all.
This should always be done in preparation, not in retrospect.