Can slat/slots help with midrange nulls at MIX
-
guavatone
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:13 pm
- Location: Clifton, NJ
- Contact:
Can slat/slots help with midrange nulls at MIX
I have been ironing out some bass issues and moving up the spectrum every couple days. I plan to post a diary soon. anyway I know this is general, but,
I am seeing and hearing huge nulls in my midrange 1-8k. Can slats help me, maybe space 1/2". I am running out of places where my speakers will have a direct shot on any more surfaces. Will slats help even if they are not in a direct path of monitors. I'll have to figure out how to upload my response, I am not sure if "fuzz measure exports pics.
( I though I had at least a intermediate grasp on acoustics but this is f-ing me up. I have everest's 3 books by my nightable.... hmm , I guess this just shows how dense I am....oh well).
I am seeing and hearing huge nulls in my midrange 1-8k. Can slats help me, maybe space 1/2". I am running out of places where my speakers will have a direct shot on any more surfaces. Will slats help even if they are not in a direct path of monitors. I'll have to figure out how to upload my response, I am not sure if "fuzz measure exports pics.
( I though I had at least a intermediate grasp on acoustics but this is f-ing me up. I have everest's 3 books by my nightable.... hmm , I guess this just shows how dense I am....oh well).
-Charlie
-
AVare
- Confused, but not senile yet
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Hanilton, Ontario, Canada
Without having any additional information, I would look some reflectiion path analysis to see where the offending reflections are from. At 1k the wavelenght is 1.1FT so the problem is a .55FT differential. I wouild suspect something like a strong reflection of the mixer, or keyboard, etc.
Good luck!
Andre
Good luck!
Andre
-
guavatone
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:13 pm
- Location: Clifton, NJ
- Contact:
Thanks for the reply, and yes, sorry for the lack of info. I played around with placing 2" auralex around the early relfection spots and it yielded no significant results. I have 2 questions:
1. most people say that modes do not affect higher frquencies, but isn't it posible that modes continue to resonate at higher harmonics, eg past 1K?
2. Maybe this problem is with the speakers (Mackie HR24). They read flat within 6" from the monitor. Is it possible they radiate in a strange pattern?
OH! - sometimes I'll get a response that doesn't have these huge nulls, but then 2 seconds later they return. This is a bit strange, but on average the nulls prevail in my measurements.
1. most people say that modes do not affect higher frquencies, but isn't it posible that modes continue to resonate at higher harmonics, eg past 1K?
2. Maybe this problem is with the speakers (Mackie HR24). They read flat within 6" from the monitor. Is it possible they radiate in a strange pattern?
OH! - sometimes I'll get a response that doesn't have these huge nulls, but then 2 seconds later they return. This is a bit strange, but on average the nulls prevail in my measurements.
-Charlie
-
AVare
- Confused, but not senile yet
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Hanilton, Ontario, Canada
Uh, I don't understand your POV. If you have a room with perfectly reflective surfaces with perfectly specular reflection, nothing to difuuse the sound in the room (like lighting fixtures, furniture, equipment, people, or yourself), then yes. Does the above descrive your room as you use it?1. most people say that modes do not affect higher frquencies, but isn't it posible that modes continue to resonate at higher harmonics, eg past 1K?
Uh, yes it possible with your speakers. With the lack of additional information it is impossible to say if that is what is happening.Is it possible they radiate in a strange pattern?
I would look at reflection paths.
Keep us posted!
Andre
-
guavatone
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:13 pm
- Location: Clifton, NJ
- Contact:
I think I know what you are saying andre, and my reflections are not totally optimal. -my desk could be lower with more angle, and my racks are to the left of my ear by 2 feet. The monitor tweeters are avout 1.5' from he mixer. I don't think anything is 6" away though.
There is a huge 4" OC703 panel directly behind the monitors, but these midrange nuls were there before the 703.
I will buckle down and try to illustrate with smartdraw or sketchup soon.
There is a huge 4" OC703 panel directly behind the monitors, but these midrange nuls were there before the 703.
I will buckle down and try to illustrate with smartdraw or sketchup soon.
-Charlie
-
AVare
- Confused, but not senile yet
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Hanilton, Ontario, Canada
-
guavatone
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:13 pm
- Location: Clifton, NJ
- Contact:
AVare wrote:The filtering is caused by a difference in travel distances of half wavelenghts, NOT of of objects being a half wavelength different in distance.
Andre
For some reason my brain isn't picturing this, do you think you could give me an example, or point me to a page in an Everest book?
-Charlie
-
AVare
- Confused, but not senile yet
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Hanilton, Ontario, Canada
Unfortunately I can not think of one off hand. Would anyone reading who knows of a good link to show this, post the link please? Thanks.guavatone wrote:AVare wrote:The filtering is caused by a difference in travel distances of half wavelenghts, NOT of of objects being a half wavelength different in distance.
Andre
For some reason my brain isn't picturing this, do you think you could give me an example, or point me to a page in an Everest book?
Trying to help:
Andre
-
guavatone
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:13 pm
- Location: Clifton, NJ
- Contact:
here's some sketchup draft of the layout, there's actually more treatment on the walls but it gives the basic idea. The space is awkward and this was what I found to be best placement of the desk and gear. There is a synth workstation to the left of mix as well.
Oh well.... anyone know why this is black?
here is my large sketchup file:
http://www.guavatone.com/free/Guavatone-4.skp
Oh well.... anyone know why this is black?
here is my large sketchup file:
http://www.guavatone.com/free/Guavatone-4.skp
Last edited by guavatone on Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-Charlie
-
guavatone
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:13 pm
- Location: Clifton, NJ
- Contact:
I got my pics up. Also, I have been testing various spots in my studio and keep getting these huge nulls at 1.4-1.8 KHz. Makes me think it's the speakers. My walls are mostly wood treated with 2" and 1" 703. The ceiling has 703(1" and 2") mixed with some acoustic tiles(10-20%) that were there since I moved in.
-Charlie
-
guavatone
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:13 pm
- Location: Clifton, NJ
- Contact:
-
kendale
- Moderator
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 8:10 pm
- Location: Hawaii
Aloha,
No worries!
Thanks for resizing them pics.
Have you considered arranging your setup to accomplish a more symmetrical footprint? Here's some advice I was given (courtesy of Knightfly):
- Is it possible for you to set up in the upper right hand corner of your room, with your speakers firing down the length of the room? (toward the area where you are currently setup)
- Does your ceiling slope at all, and if so, which way?
Aloha
No worries!
Have you considered arranging your setup to accomplish a more symmetrical footprint? Here's some advice I was given (courtesy of Knightfly):
A couple of points to ponder:Left/right room symmetry (at least within a foot or two of ear height) is important for good stereo imaging,
- Is it possible for you to set up in the upper right hand corner of your room, with your speakers firing down the length of the room? (toward the area where you are currently setup)
- Does your ceiling slope at all, and if so, which way?
Aloha
-
kendale
- Moderator
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 8:10 pm
- Location: Hawaii
Aloha,
Here's another design idea Knightfly offered during my design phase:
Aloha
Hmm, I don't think that would work after checking out your skp file.- Is it possible for you to set up in the upper right hand corner of your room, with your speakers firing down the length of the room? (toward the area where you are currently setup)
Here's another design idea Knightfly offered during my design phase:
Would/could something like this work?For your application, a movable panel about 4" thick would help the wall unit "disappear" acoustically - it could be moved against a wall somewhere when not in use.
Aloha
-
kendale
- Moderator
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 8:10 pm
- Location: Hawaii
Aloha,
Aloha
After buildng and installing the side and rear absorber panels for my place, the results were a vast improvement:I am seeing and hearing huge nulls in my midrange 1-8k. Can slats help me, maybe space 1/2". I am running out of places where my speakers will have a direct shot on any more surfaces.
Food for thought perhaps?Update: Finished rear panel/insulation install on side absorbers. (Still waiting for Guilford - they're stuffed, but not pretty!)
Initial listening test: Hey, this stuff really works! Reference cuts sound cleaner, crisp even. Depth perception has improved, and even more refinements of initial improvements posted earlier. (bottom end tighter/ imaging clearer/ drums sound clearer, more defined in mixes/able to hear clearer at lower volumes than before/room sounds quieter without music playing, louder & tighter with less effort when music played/less fatigue/more enjoyment in listening to mixes!)
A lot of the low-mid/mid haze is gone - like somewhere between defogging/cleaning your windshield. It's amazing how much of a difference each step of the treatment makes. Even more so, it's interesting to note how much mush was there in the first place! No wonder that first CD in this location was such a struggle. Rolling Eyes
Aloha