I have a rectangular room, 11'L x 8'W x 7'H, that I am converting to a studio/control room. This room will be used for mixing, and recording acoustic guitar and vocals.
I have heard that rooms this small should have an unusually high percentage of absorbtion. I have also heard that a high percentage of absorbtion makes for an uncomfortable workspace. Which is correct?
I will be using homemade 2'x4' mineral fiber (2"/8pcf) absorbers for treatment, if it affects your answers.
Thanks in advance...
How Much Absorbtion Is Needed
-
Ethan Winer
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 3:50 am
- Location: New Milford, CT, USA
- Contact:
Re: How Much Absorbtion Is Needed
CF,
> Which is correct? <
Both. You want as much absorption as possible below 300 Hz, and proportionately less above that frequency.
--Ethan
> Which is correct? <
Both. You want as much absorption as possible below 300 Hz, and proportionately less above that frequency.
--Ethan
-
cfegela
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:15 am
-
knightfly
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6976
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:11 am
- Location: West Coast, USA
Recording rooms should be a bit more "live" than control rooms - for a single room situation, you might wanna look at variable treatments such as the bottom of this page
http://www.saecollege.de/reference_mate ... stics2.htm
Also, this may help with surface area requirements -
http://www.saecollege.de/reference_mate ... m#verbcalc
HTH... Steve
http://www.saecollege.de/reference_mate ... stics2.htm
Also, this may help with surface area requirements -
http://www.saecollege.de/reference_mate ... m#verbcalc
HTH... Steve
Soooo, when a Musician dies, do they hear the white noise at the end of the tunnel??!? Hmmmm...