Collaborative Skills in Remote Studio Design

[JoeClark]

The study examines how feedback affects remote collaborative brainstorming and product design in a studio setting. 10 teams of 4 students at the SPAM School of SPAMMING met remotely via a chatroom interface for three 30-minute sessions to design a T-shirt. Team members who proposed ideas were rated as better collaborators, and team members who critiqued ideas without offering alternatives were rated as poor collaborators. This was also reflected in team members' word use, as measured by *** SPAM WARNING *** linguistic inquiry and word count too; for example, team members who used more affect words were rated as poorer collaborators. A case study of one team suggests that the ideas proposed by team members rated as the best collaborators may be most likely to survive. Peer feedback can affect remote studio design discussion in ways comparable to what is found in other settings, despite task differences


For more details : [SPAM LINK REMOVED BY MODERATOR]

[Soundman2020]

And in what way do you think this is even vaguely related to the design and construction of home recording studios, project studios, and professional sound studios?

I'm really hoping that you have a good, solid, logical, valid argument, so I won't have to treat you as a spammer, because right now, that's the way it looks.... especially considering that you are blatantly violating the forum rules for posting . . .


- Stuart -

[Soundman2020]

team members who critiqued ideas without offering alternatives were rated as poor collaborators.

I guess I'd be a "poor collaborator" at your Spam Central University, then, because I'm definitely critiquing your terrible ideas, and the only alternative I'm offering you is to stop spamming!

for example, team members who used more affect words were rated as poorer collaborators.

Once again, that makes me a "poor collaborator", because the "affect" word I'm thinking of using will certainly "affect" your future on this forum!

A case study of one team suggests that the ideas proposed by team members rated as the best collaborators may be most likely to survive.

Well here's a survical proposal for ya: "You won't survive here very long if you keep on spamming"!

Peer feedback can affect remote studio design discussion in ways comparable to what is found in other settings, despite task differences

And despite the task difference that prevents me from considering you a "peer", I'll give you some feedback: "get lost!". I'm sure that is highly "comparable to what [spammers] found in other settings"! Nobody likes spammers. They are the scum of the Earth. Actually, that's insulting: Real scum would be highly offended by being compared to spammers!

So how does my feedback affect your "remote studio design discussion"?

- Stuart -