With the near completion of my studio construction I'm starting to plan on acoustic treatment.
I've read everything I could find regarding superchunks and acoustic hangers and there are many respectable people (including Mr Sayers himself) who seem to swear by the latter.
I have a 15' 3/4' long, 9' 7/8' wide, 11' 1/8' high control room (hopefully imperial measurements make sense, I use metrics) where I'm planning of stuffing the front tri-corners floor to ceiling with superchunks (2x2').
Loads of 30kg/m3 85mm glass wool which I'm going to use for the work.
I seem to understand that for the back wall (behind the engineer, that is) acoustic hangers can have a deeper, stronger absorption in less space (hence less material). Is this correct?
I can easily fill the whole 9' 7/8' width, go a little deeper than 2' in length and all the way ceiling to bottom with acoustic treatment.
Starting by placing one hanger halfway between walls, measuring the distance between the hanger and the wall and placing another hanger half way and so on... I came up with two scenarios: the first considers 1/4" thick, 2' wide, 8' 7/8' high MDF boards rotated 45° and covered on both sides by 85mm glass wool, whereas the second sketch uses the same setup, but covering the boards only on one side with glass wool, allowing for 13 hangers to fit into the back wall vs the 7 hangers of the first sketch. In the first scenario the space center to center between hangers is 14" 3/4", in the second scenario it is 5" 3/8". In the first case the air gap between hangers is 3" 1/2", in the second it is 1" 5/8".
I left two walls out of the sketches to make it easier on the eyes, but it's a perfectly rectangular room.
I can make the hangers even taller if necessary, covering filling the whole height between floor and ceiling (leaving the necessary space to make them hang freely).
What are your thoughts on this plan?
It wasn't very easy finding information about the construction of acoustic hangers. Does it sound like I'm doing it right and if so which of the two setups would give the most benefits in your opinion?
Also, do you think this would give more benefits over simply filling the back wall tri-corners with 2' 3/4' x 2' 3/4' superchunks of glass wool and treating first point reflections on the same wall?
Or maybe it would be more beneficial to use superchunks and only place hangers in the remaining space in between the superchunks (which would mean fitting 4 hangers in the first scenario and 9 in the second)?
My initial plan was to completely hide the hangers (hence the back wall) behind acoustically transparent fabric, but then I remembered that a room is supposed to be "infinitely long" by making the back wall "infinitely absorptive." Does it mean I should go the other way around and that a thick, high frequency absorptive curtain would be better fit for covering the back wall compared to acoustically transparent fabric?
One extra, slightly off-topic question: in building my cloud ceiling absorber, would it be more effective to make it larger or deeper? Meaning, assuming I'm covering all the first reflection points coming off the speakers, is it more effective to use a 6' x 4', 170mm thick cloud or would you rather go with a 12' x 8' 85mm thick one? Consider that: 1) I have enough height in my room that I can lower the cloud even as much as 4 feet and 2) I have enough glass wool to make it as thick as I want it to be.
Eager to read your thoughts on this seemingly obscure matter!

P.S. Does it make any difference that my glass wool is covered in kraft paper? I can rip it out if necessary, but I'll happily avoid it if it is irrelevant.
P.P.S. Note that I'm planning this before construction is 100% finished so I don't have REW measurements yet. Once I do I'll make more precise assessments, but I assume this would be a good starting point anyway since a room this small will likely need tons of broadband absorption.