soffits and cloth

Forum for all aspects of speakers and speaker design.

Moderator: Aaronw

-=glEnn=-
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 6:09 pm

soffits and cloth

Post by -=glEnn=- »

a little question for you thomas! :)
you recommend keeping the entire front wall reflective for soffit mounted speakers right?.
the reason im asking is that alot of the pro designed studios like Russ Bergerhttp://www.rbdg.com and Francis Manzella http://www.fmdesign.com looks like they have the soffits and entire front wall covered with cloth[/url]
Could you explain how cloth on the baffle and front wall affects speaker performance? :?:

thanks
mike
genericperson
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 9:12 pm
Location: NYC area USA

Post by genericperson »

could just be Guillford of Maine cloth, which is acoustically transparent.
-=glEnn=-
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 6:09 pm

Post by -=glEnn=- »

thanks GP!

you dont happen to know which "model" of the Guliford cloths that is acoustically transparent?, the have so many different materials.
I like the idea of cloth front cause i have no idea how to make the front wall look good with reflective materials.

thanks
mike
barefoot
Moderator
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 4:49 am
Location: Portland Oregon
Contact:

Post by barefoot »

As long as it's not too thick, cloth shouldn't have much of an effect. If you plug your baffle width into my 1D Wall Bounce Calculator and set D to zero you'll see the 6 dB low end shelf. Only the frequencies that rise significantly above the 0 dB line are influenced by the soffit baffle. The higher frequencies are only influenced by the speaker baffle. So, if the cloth has little absorption in the range of the shelf, it will have little impact on the direct response. However, the cloth will certainly inflence the ambient response of the room.

Thomas
Thomas Barefoot
Barefoot Sound
-=glEnn=-
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 6:09 pm

Post by -=glEnn=- »

thanks for the explanation Thomas!
But ideally the front wall and soffit baffle should be reflective right?


thanks
Mike
Post Reply