Modes and measurements and plans, oh my.

Plans and things, layout, style, where do I put my near-fields etc.

Moderators: Aaronw, kendale, John Sayers

ScottPetersen
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 3:30 pm

Modes and measurements and plans, oh my.

Post by ScottPetersen »

Hello all, I am a sound designer with a small budget and a big hammer. :D

My company has finally given me the green light to transform a largish office/meeting room into an acoustically treated foley/sfx/voice/live instrument recording space. The space is located at the ass-end of the building so isolation is not an issue, only acoustic treatment. I posted the plans before over at recording.org and got some great feedback from knightfly (thanks again Steve) and would like to explore my proposed solutions even further before I go ahead and pull the trigger on the materials order.

So, here is the room:
Image
North wall - Bass hangars behind acoustically transparant false wall
South wall - Array of diffusive elements
East wall - a pair of 4'x8' helmholtz resonators stacked either horizontally of vertically
West wall - 2 pairs of 4'x8' helmholtz resonators stacked either horizontally or vertically
I am possibly considering converting the stacked pairs of resonators into single cavities. Another alternative is to make each of the 6 resonators tuned to a specific frequency.

I just finished ripping out the industrial carpet flooring and replacing it with a wood-laminate floor:
Image
Image

And here are the calculated modes (full ceiling height is 12' 4" - acoustic tiles are hung at 8' 6"):
Image

I have been testing my room with ETF (great software!) and have been gratified to see theory and math to very closely predict the results I have been getting:
Image
I have made a fair number of measurements at different locations with different speaker placements and find that the above result is very representative of the frequency response I have been getting. This specific measurement was made with the speaker on the floor (tannoy active reveal) firing into the furthest north-east corner of the room and the microphone (AT4050 in omni mode, no bass cut) at head height in the south-west corner.

So here are my questions:
  • Can I assume that the bass hangers will absorb modes below 100 Hz? That 70Hz spike shows up in every measurement I have made in this room and I am quite concerned about it. (I have ruled out a playback or mic resonance by measuring my personal office using the same techniques). I know that once I take care of the fundamentals, that all the harmonics will diminish as well, but this means that those traps have to soak up a lot of energy down in the nether regions and I am at a loss of how exactly to size these hangers and spec their material.
  • Should I build broadband resonators or tuned resonators (high Q or low Q)? I might be over estimating the effect that using a wedge shaped air space has on a helmholtz resonator, but I do know that it broadens the curve. Would this be a problem when attempting to tackle the 104 Hz ringing I see? I would still like to keep splayed walls so this could be a big issue in the design if it would be better not to have a broadband helmholtz resonator.
  • Should I tune all 6 of the proposed resonators to different frequencies? My intuition says that I should hit low and hard with the tuning and construction, but as I have learned already, acoustics can be quite counter-intuitive .
Thanks for any and all comments.

Scott Petersen
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by John Sayers »

I'd look at something more like this - the hangers are variable giving a broader range low frequency absorption. That corner of the room will be tight and dead - on the other hand the other corner will be brighter and more diffuse. This will allow you to move instruments or foley effects to suit.

Your ceiling is another factor, albeit that it would have affected your curves. I wouldn't do anything with it for now as you can alter it later if your room is either too bright or too dead which is purely subjective at this stage.

cheers
john
Post Reply