What are the key elements that would definitely draw the line between the acoustic need of a floating floor and the mere waste of time, money and effort that would imply its application when not really necessary?
Does anybody have an answer?
alex.
Some of the key elements would be:
1) How much sound is actually being transmitted thru the floor, or, how much of a flanking path is it?
Try doing some sound tests to see how well your existing floor performs as is. You may find that you don't need to float.
However, if you learn that your floor performs poorly then there a few other issues to consider. If sound tests show you that your existing floor does not adequately reduce sound levels, then you need to do the following:
a) figure out how much sound isolation you want to achieve
b) figure out how much additional weight your existing floor can hold via a competent structural engineer.
If you learn that your floor can hold little to no extra weight, then you've found your answer, don't float.
c) If you have additional weight capacity available, make sure that your walls and new floor will perform equally.
You don't want to build a floating floor that can't match the performance of superior walls etc, etc. That would be a huge waste of time and money. You have to take into account any new walls and new ceiling when factoring weight capacity for your existing floor.
2) What is your budget?
Floating a floor properly is expensive. You may realize during or after all your research that you just don't have the money.
These are what I would consider to be the biggest factors in deciding whether or not floating a floor is worth it.