57 Octaves below middle "C"?

How to use REW, What is a Bass Trap, a diffuser, the speed of sound, etc.

Moderators: Aaronw, sharward

cadesignr
Senior Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:25 pm
Location: Oregon USA

57 Octaves below middle "C"?

Post by cadesignr »

:shock: Don't laugh. That is exactly what Netscape reported.
Is god a super musician? Ha! Well, this report tickled my brain to the point of hysteria. How in the world can something vibrate in a negative number? Thomas , I'm no acoustician, but my brain is missing something, at least to my way of thinking. Maybe you can clarify something. The report said a Blackhole emissions vibrate at cycles that equate to a soundwave with a Bb pitch, but 57 octaves below middle "C", How can that be? Like to see a speaker that could replicate that note!(just kidding)
I mean if an "A" note below middle C vibrates at 440hz, and one octave below that is 220hz(is that correct) then it doesn't take but a few more octaves to approach 1hz. Doesn't it make sense that anything below 1 cycle is not a soundwave? It makes sense to me, but like I said, I'm not an acoustician. Just a musician. With very little science background. So maybe you can explain a bit Thomas?
And one other thing if you don't mind.
For lack of a better word, what "quality" of a sound wave dictates amplitude? If this is outside of the scope of this forum, forgive me and I'll search on the net.
Hmmm, 57 octaves huh. God sure built a heck of a studio! :D
Cheers
fitZ :D
alright, breaks over , back on your heads......
barefoot
Moderator
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 4:49 am
Location: Portland Oregon
Contact:

Post by barefoot »

The number of octaves just means the number of times you multiply or divide by 2. Middle C is, I believe, 262 Hz. So the frequency 57 octaves below middle C is 262 Hz divided by 2, 57 times.

262 Hz / 2^57 = 1.8 x 10^-15 Hz

in other words, one cycle every 17.5 million years!

The amplitude of a sound wave is the amount the pressure deviates from the normal atmospheric pressure. When you represent a sound wave graphically the top of the wave indicates higher pressure than normal. The bottom indicates lower pressure than normal.

I'm a scientist, so don't know anything about God or gods. But yes, the universe certainly is a wild place! :)

Thomas
Thomas Barefoot
Barefoot Sound
cadesignr
Senior Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:25 pm
Location: Oregon USA

Post by cadesignr »


in other words, one cycle every 17.5 million years!


:shock: Oh. Now I get it. Thanks Thomas.

fitZ
alright, breaks over , back on your heads......
cadesignr
Senior Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:25 pm
Location: Oregon USA

Post by cadesignr »

Oh, so the 440hz "A" is above middle "C". Oops. Been a long time.
fitZ
alright, breaks over , back on your heads......
giles117
Senior Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Henderson County
Contact:

Post by giles117 »

CAD remember Hz or hertz means cycle per second. So it is a time based observation of waveform movement.

Bryan Giles

barefoot, And being a scientist has nothing to do with knowing god or gods, one is based on emperical data the other is based on your unseen beliefs (or faith based). So be careful to not confuse the 2 as having relevance over one another.

But what you believe can be more real then what you see. (not a religious lesson....)

Very elementary example.

Your car won't start... Scientifically proven by an auto mechanic who runs all the right test (which is a science in and of itself) proves it cannot start, but you believe it will start and in your non scientific effort turn the key and it does start. So who is right? Science or your belief.... They both are, just your belief became reality for you at that moment.

Have a great day.
cadesignr
Senior Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:25 pm
Location: Oregon USA

Post by cadesignr »

Hello Brien, and thanks for the info and example. Didn't mean to bring any kind of theological or faith conflicts in here. Just a joke. But I do have my beliefs.
Sorry Thomas, I was just curious.
Cheers
fitZ
alright, breaks over , back on your heads......
cadesignr
Senior Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:25 pm
Location: Oregon USA

Post by cadesignr »

but you believe it will start and in your non scientific effort turn the key and it does start.

My faith in this is challanged every morning in my Dodge Ram :P
fitZ
alright, breaks over , back on your heads......
barefoot
Moderator
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 4:49 am
Location: Portland Oregon
Contact:

Post by barefoot »

giles117 wrote:Your car won't start... Scientifically proven by an auto mechanic who runs all the right test (which is a science in and of itself) proves it cannot start, but you believe it will start and in your non scientific effort turn the key and it does start. So who is right? Science or your belief.... They both are, just your belief became reality for you at that moment.
Well, clearly the mechanic didn't run all the right tests. She didn't turn the key. So her theory that the car won't start is incorrect. It's based on incomplete experimental evidence. And it doesn't matter whether the driver believes or doesn't believe the car will start. All she has done by turning the key and starting the car is experimentally proven that the mechanic's theory is incorrect.

Scientific theories are proven incorrect all the time. This doesn't make science invalid. In fact, it shows the very strength of science. Science allows, no, begs for the current dogma to be proven wrong. Scientists are completely open to the idea that everything we currently believe about the universe may be wrong. If compelling and reproducible evidence proves a theory is invalid, we must discard that old theory and develop a new one that encompasses the new evidence.

A better analogy between scientists, auto mechanics, believers in God, and drivers might go like this.

An auto mechanic studies a car from bumper to bumper. She finds it has fuel, an engine, an electrical system, etc. The car runs and, even though she doesn't completely understand all the intricate details of how the car works, it generally seems to make sense. The car runs, and from everything she can determine, the car should run. It's self-consistent and self-contained.

Now, the driver comes along and says "The only reason this car runs is because it has invisible, undetectable gremlins living in it. They bring it to life." The mechanic replies "Why do you think that? The car has everything it needs to run. You don't need gremlins to explain why it runs." The driver responds "I just belive the gremlins are there. I have faith in them. Can you prove they aren't there?" The mechanic says "No, I guess I can't disprove the existence of invisible, undetectable gremlins. Nor can I disprove the existence of fairies or trolls. All I can say is it seems very clear to me that none of those critters are required to make this car run".

So, where did our universal "car" ultimately come from? It seems that nobody really knows at this point. Gods, gremlins, or alternate dimensions, it's anybody's guess. But, at least as far as we observe things today, the universe is self-contained. Stars, black holes, terrestrial life,.... everything, obeys the laws of physics as we know them. No supernatural intervention required.

Thomas
Thomas Barefoot
Barefoot Sound
cadesignr
Senior Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:25 pm
Location: Oregon USA

Post by cadesignr »

[/quote]everything, obeys the laws of physics

Yea, but what created the laws in the first place?
Don't answer that. This isn't the place and I havn't got the smarts or time to debate it. Besides, my car is running at the moment :D
Cheers
fitZ
alright, breaks over , back on your heads......
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by John Sayers »

Guys - in a book called "The Third Ear" written by a german music prof he proposes that the cycle of the moon around the earth octavised up to the audio spectrum comes out at A435 which is the tuning Bach, Beathoven, Motzart tuned to - it was raised to A440 by the French in the 19th century to make the orchestra sound brighter. It's been proposed that Hendrix was looking for it when he detuned a semitone.

Similarly the cycle of the earth going around the sun octavised up creates a note of 260hz which is known as the OM note in Indian music to which they must be able to produce to tune - the same note octavised further up into the light spectrum comes out as the Buddist red that the Dali Lama wears :):)

cheers
john
giles117
Senior Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Henderson County
Contact:

Post by giles117 »

LOL. Boy oh Boy, wasn't trying to start a theological debate considering most theologians don't believe in the concept of faith.

They talk about it but no practical application in their own lives so we came up with a joke, I went to cemetary, oops I mean seminary school. So I know how to make a great speech and preach a canned sermon but I don't live by this stuff.

Sorta like the psychologist who tells you how to live but is living in hell herself. Guess her advice is not based on reality but a book she never really understood anyway. Else she would not be living in hell.

BTW, Thomas, it was assumed when I said the mechanic ran ALL the right tests that the key turn was one of them. Cuz when you read with clarity as most scientific people do.... What is left after all???

Anyway.......Enjoy the weekend guys....

Finally.. Being an ex-auto mechanic my self... Most GOOD mechanics are studied in the sciences relating to the design, construct, etc.. of cars. Heck I had to study combustion, hydraulics, etc.. so I had a clue. I studied the theories and Proven facts behind how and why. I have been a how and why person my entire life. It is never enough for me to just know it works. I study it all in detail to learn the... Aww man here this guy goes again... Practical RELATIVE application of the thing.

And your example is very poor. The bible says in Hebrews 11:1 NOW faith is the substance of things hoped for. I don't expect you to understand and unless you are ready to give your life to Jesus Christ and receive the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, you will never understand what that means so I would be be-laboring a point to try to illustrate something that can only be revealed by Faith in God, the death burial and resurrection of His Son Jesus Christ and accepting that when he rose from the dead that he sent us the Comforter, AKA The Holy Spirit whom Jesus promised would Teach us all things. Then and only then would be able to KNOW all things that you mentioned in your paragraph. The Book of Romans 1:20-22 says it this way,

For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

So lets just leave it at that. :) and back to building studios.

Bryan Giles
giles117
Senior Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Henderson County
Contact:

Post by giles117 »

Let me add this.. I am not here to condemn anyone or knock anyone, I just realize unless you have what I have, you can never understand and know what I understand and Know.

Just like a guy who is ONLY a great chef trying to understand acoustical theory. He would be lost in the wilderness. He has to get what you got to know what you know.

Bryan Giles
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by John Sayers »

I agree with what Thomas says. I agree that science seeks to be proven wrong, and it has to be proven wrong consistently, just as it has to prove something is right by reproducing it consistently.

I also accept that somehow musicians locked in with one of the universe's cycles subconsciously and created A435 or the Buddhists did the same getting their OM note. Humans don't always act scientifically either. On old aboriginal in the Kimberly region of Northern Australia proved that to me when he projected his image into my fire one night - it's one of the old tricks the Shamen, or clevermen as they are locally called, would do all the time to notify other tribes of their presence. It is reputed by various witnesses the he walked into a hospital to see a patient that the doctors had written off and walked out the door with he completely cured. The doctors had no idea of how he did it and were totally amazed. The first question he asked me was “Hey johnny – why does a stone roll up a hill?” Of course I couldn’t answer it but I felt he could J

Which in a way is what Bryan is saying.

Cheers
john
cadesignr
Senior Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:25 pm
Location: Oregon USA

Post by cadesignr »

Gentleman, I surely did not intend for my post to become a debate on the merits of faith or science. Next time I let curiosity get the best of me, I will search out an appropriate place to do so. Thank you for your replys. And may the force be with you :D
fitZ
alright, breaks over , back on your heads......
barefoot
Moderator
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 4:49 am
Location: Portland Oregon
Contact:

Post by barefoot »

I've moved my comments to a more appropriate forum.
http://johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=689
Thomas Barefoot
Barefoot Sound
Post Reply