Mineral wool vs. Fiberglass for absorbers
-
Vagabond
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:59 am
- Location: Southeast USA
Mineral wool vs. Fiberglass for absorbers
Hi everybody,
I see lots of people using OC703 for broadband absorbers. From looking at mineral wool and it's NRC values, it seems a little better at low frequencies but I hear is a good bit nastier to work with. Also does it have a smell at all? I read a post somewhere where someone said theirs had a smell. I just wondered why I don't see more people using mineral wool, if there was some downside besides being nastier to work with that I wasn't catching.
Thanks for any help!
I see lots of people using OC703 for broadband absorbers. From looking at mineral wool and it's NRC values, it seems a little better at low frequencies but I hear is a good bit nastier to work with. Also does it have a smell at all? I read a post somewhere where someone said theirs had a smell. I just wondered why I don't see more people using mineral wool, if there was some downside besides being nastier to work with that I wasn't catching.
Thanks for any help!
-
Eric_Desart
- Senior Member
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 6:09 pm
- Location: Antwerp/Belgium
- Contact:
Vagabond
Rockwool and glasswool (fibreglass) are interchangeable.
Look at Bob gold's page:
http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorptionCoefficients.htm
Knightfly has entered this link here somewhere in the stickies too I think.
One is a bit more itchie to work with than the other, but both cause this.
There really is no reason to choose one over the other for mechanical or chemical reasons, unless glassfiber boards are a bit more elastic and rockwool a bit more brittle (The types and brands I know).
Summary: you can use both as good.
Eric
Rockwool and glasswool (fibreglass) are interchangeable.
Look at Bob gold's page:
http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorptionCoefficients.htm
Knightfly has entered this link here somewhere in the stickies too I think.
One is a bit more itchie to work with than the other, but both cause this.
There really is no reason to choose one over the other for mechanical or chemical reasons, unless glassfiber boards are a bit more elastic and rockwool a bit more brittle (The types and brands I know).
Summary: you can use both as good.
Eric
Best regards - Eric Desart
My posts are never meant to sell whatever incl. myself, neither direct, nor indirect.
My posts are never meant to sell whatever incl. myself, neither direct, nor indirect.
-
knightfly
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6976
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:11 am
- Location: West Coast, USA
Tom, tried these guys?
http://www.spi-co.com/servicecenterdire ... ?detail=56
the branch near me has more mineral wool than fiberglass, call 'em and see what they have in 3 PCF range... Steve
http://www.spi-co.com/servicecenterdire ... ?detail=56
the branch near me has more mineral wool than fiberglass, call 'em and see what they have in 3 PCF range... Steve
Soooo, when a Musician dies, do they hear the white noise at the end of the tunnel??!? Hmmmm...
-
z60611
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 9:08 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
My rockwool doesn't smell at all -- and I've got a bunch of it hanging above me, and a bunch open scattered around the walls at the floor.Also does it have a smell at all?
The grey/green stuff is Roxul RHF80 rockwool: http://www.bobgolds.com/SpeakerTests/20 ... G_0953.jpg
Here's Roxul SafeNSound in my ceiling: http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorberCeilingJoist/
http://www.bobgolds.com/InsulationContractors.htm
-
John Sayers
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
Vagabond
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:59 am
- Location: Southeast USA
I was looking at the Roxul products but I'm too far south to get any - I'd have to order a truck full of the stuff from Canada. I'm looking at Fibrex and IIG and Owens Corning 700 series at the moment. One requirement is that I need to get it in 16" widths and according to the data sheets Fibrex SAFB is the only one that does that, the Fibrex FBX series and the IIG 1200 series (which look to be exactly the same product, perhaps resold by one company and manufactured by the other - NRC coeffs are the same) are only listed as coming in 24" widths.
-
knightfly
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6976
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:11 am
- Location: West Coast, USA
I'm too far south to get any
We would know that if you could follow the "don't even think about..." thread at the top of the forum - specifically the part about editing your profile to include a location
Thanks... Steve
We would know that if you could follow the "don't even think about..." thread at the top of the forum - specifically the part about editing your profile to include a location
Thanks... Steve
Soooo, when a Musician dies, do they hear the white noise at the end of the tunnel??!? Hmmmm...
-
Vagabond
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:59 am
- Location: Southeast USA
Sorry, I generally like to remain as anonymous as possible on the internet. Will modify location per forum guidelines. Also since forum guidelines want room details here we go:
Added information: These will be for broadband absorbers meant to kill first reflections in a music listening environment. I live in an apartment and move every few years, but my current listening room is 12'x17'. I listen on one side of the 17 foot dimension so the listening room/setup is assymetric, and I only really have to kill the reflection off the right 12' wall (no windows). I also might want some absorption perhaps on the back wall for slap echo and perhaps on the ceiling for its first reflection point. I would like 16" wide panels for aesthetic reasons.
Added information: These will be for broadband absorbers meant to kill first reflections in a music listening environment. I live in an apartment and move every few years, but my current listening room is 12'x17'. I listen on one side of the 17 foot dimension so the listening room/setup is assymetric, and I only really have to kill the reflection off the right 12' wall (no windows). I also might want some absorption perhaps on the back wall for slap echo and perhaps on the ceiling for its first reflection point. I would like 16" wide panels for aesthetic reasons.
-
amistybleu
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:35 am
- Location: Denver, Colorado
-
amistybleu
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:35 am
- Location: Denver, Colorado
Woops, attachment didn't work.
Ok, my sketch is .bmp and it wont work.
-
z60611
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 9:08 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
I'm a home theatre guy (think 5.1 control room with big video), and not a musician (well, I play clasical guitar and piano and saxaphone but so poorly the 'not a musician' applies)
I read recently about a hip-hop engineer who always made his mixes with way too much bass -- because his chair was in a multi-modal null.
You can make them out of anything found here
http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorptionCoefficients.htm
but you might find a link to someone who sells 703 in your area here
http://www.bobgolds.com/InsulationContractors.htm
Not that 703 is any better -- just find something on
http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorptionCoefficients.htm
with absorption coefficients similar to 703 or slightly lower if you're building superchunks as opposed to diagonal Corner absorbers.
Before you start have a look at this page:
http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorptionCoefficients.htm
at the links between "Jon Risch's Absorbers" and "Vshine's Wall Absorbers"
and this page
http://www.bobgolds.com/
at the links between "ChristianG's Corner Traps" and "TrevorMag's Slotted-For-Aesthetics Corner Absorbers"
There's also the easiest of DIY bags from
http://www.readytraps.com/products.php?cat=10
http://www.modularacoustics.com/teabagz ... ctions.htm
As a "rehearsal space" you probably want to keep the room live -- so perhaps portable absorption (gobos, variable absorbers) and diffusers might be good.
If you have nothing else in the room (no carpet, no false ceiling, no couches) then any of the 12 corners would be fine (4 wall-wall, 4 wall-ceiling, 4 wall-floor) -- all modes are active in tri-corners. May as well take a bite out of them.1) Bass traps, OK where, I am thinking far end of the room, what then behind speaker cabs, ie: bass & guitar, looking at Jon Risch's Tube bass trap plans.
I read recently about a hip-hop engineer who always made his mixes with way too much bass -- because his chair was in a multi-modal null.
Sure. That'd make an excellent first reflection point absorber.would a 4" deep x2'x4' pine frame with 4" of thermafiber work well
You can make them out of anything found here
http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorptionCoefficients.htm
but you might find a link to someone who sells 703 in your area here
http://www.bobgolds.com/InsulationContractors.htm
Not that 703 is any better -- just find something on
http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorptionCoefficients.htm
with absorption coefficients similar to 703 or slightly lower if you're building superchunks as opposed to diagonal Corner absorbers.
Before you start have a look at this page:
http://www.bobgolds.com/AbsorptionCoefficients.htm
at the links between "Jon Risch's Absorbers" and "Vshine's Wall Absorbers"
and this page
http://www.bobgolds.com/
at the links between "ChristianG's Corner Traps" and "TrevorMag's Slotted-For-Aesthetics Corner Absorbers"
There's also the easiest of DIY bags from
http://www.readytraps.com/products.php?cat=10
http://www.modularacoustics.com/teabagz ... ctions.htm
As a "rehearsal space" you probably want to keep the room live -- so perhaps portable absorption (gobos, variable absorbers) and diffusers might be good.
-
knightfly
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6976
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:11 am
- Location: West Coast, USA
-
amistybleu
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:35 am
- Location: Denver, Colorado