Ok, so me and a friend/coworker have been tossing around the idea of building a rehearsal studio.
I have been reading the forums here for a couple of weeks now and doing a lot of reading/researching during lunch breaks (almost daily) and at home during the nights.
one thing I can't wrap my head around is true isolation and ratings of soundproofing.
I have read here that STC ratings mean pretty much nothing in studio isolation.
here's the thing, we plan on building some rehearsal rooms and want to design it so that even though some rooms will be next to each other, it's pretty much totally isolated and sounproof from noise travelling between the rooms or out into a hallway.
I found this reference http://www.saecollege.de/reference_mate ... 0Chart.htm
and was planning on building walls similar to the 6th one down, 3 layers of 5/8" gypsum on 2x4 frames filled with fiber insulation and about a 5 inch gap between the frames. ( a total 12" gap between leaves) but how do I know this will be enough to withhold a typical rock band?
That site says that it would be roughly 61 db STC ( I'm unsure what gap size they used, and it's staggered frame) but I have seen charts where 60db is rated as normal conversation levels.
also does anyone have a reference of what db range a typical rock band praticing in a room might be?
any help is much appreciated.
wrapping my head around isolation.
-
blue642
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:49 am
- Location: Tampa,FL USA
- Contact:
-
knightfly
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6976
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:11 am
- Location: West Coast, USA
Typically 100-115 dBA; to isolate, you need to understand separate TL (Transmission Loss) at each frequency range - extreme low end (around 50 hZ) takes about 50-55 dB before the threshold of human hearing is reached, so if you can accomplish 50 dB of TL at that frequency (not an easy task) then the rest of your isolation should pretty much take care of itself.
That's because the higher the frequency, the easier it is to block - that's why I recommend building for LF TL. Once that's covered, you're more or less home free.
Here's a basic sketch I did for a Spanish member;
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/download.php?id=4141
he substituted locally available products without asking me (or having time to wait for an answer) so there are marginal things about that particular implementation, but this WILL work if built as shown... Steve
That's because the higher the frequency, the easier it is to block - that's why I recommend building for LF TL. Once that's covered, you're more or less home free.
Here's a basic sketch I did for a Spanish member;
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/download.php?id=4141
he substituted locally available products without asking me (or having time to wait for an answer) so there are marginal things about that particular implementation, but this WILL work if built as shown... Steve
Soooo, when a Musician dies, do they hear the white noise at the end of the tunnel??!? Hmmmm...
-
z60611
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 9:08 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
blue642
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:49 am
- Location: Tampa,FL USA
- Contact:
Thanks for the replies guys, great resource material!
Steve- if we built with all brick/block would we expeience a harshness of higher frequencies being reflected (somewhat typical in concrete buildings)
Also, We wanted to implement the front/entrance wall to have dual sliding glass doors which would be our weak point. Is it much much harder trying to keep sound in, when using lighter weight glass doors? (lighter than solid steel)
agaiun thanks for the tips.
Steve- if we built with all brick/block would we expeience a harshness of higher frequencies being reflected (somewhat typical in concrete buildings)
Also, We wanted to implement the front/entrance wall to have dual sliding glass doors which would be our weak point. Is it much much harder trying to keep sound in, when using lighter weight glass doors? (lighter than solid steel)
agaiun thanks for the tips.
hey

