is hi-density foam good for bass traps?

How to use REW, What is a Bass Trap, a diffuser, the speed of sound, etc.

Moderators: Aaronw, sharward

rynugz007
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 4:17 pm
Contact:

is hi-density foam good for bass traps?

Post by rynugz007 »

If i use some pretty firm, hi-density foam about 6" thick from ceiling to floor as corner traps, how effective would it be in the low end department? Or am i gonna be able to absorb a lot lower by using rigid fiberglass?

sorry if this question is redundant. This is my first post after doing some researching. Have always loved this forum. Great site!!!
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by John Sayers »

Rigid fiberglass is much more efficient plus foam is usually a fire hazard unless it's specially treated.

cheers
john
Paul Woodlock
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:36 pm
Location: Peterborough UK

Post by Paul Woodlock »

John Sayers wrote:Rigid fiberglass is much more efficient plus foam is usually a fire hazard unless it's specially treated.

cheers
john
Greetings

John's comments depend upon the foam being compared.

The correct type of foam can acutally beat the performance of rigid mineral wool slabs.

see here http://forum.studiotips.com/viewtopic.php?t=536

However the rip off cheap foams from Foam-by-Mail, and the stuff commonly seen for sale on E-Bay are NOT very good at all, and certainly conform to JOhn's comments above.


Rigid fibre glass is more cost effective though.


Paul
AVare
Confused, but not senile yet
Posts: 2336
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Hanilton, Ontario, Canada

Post by AVare »

Paul Woodlock wrote:John's comments depend upon the foam being compared.

The correct type of foam can acutally beat the performance of rigid mineral wool slabs.

see here http://forum.studiotips.com/viewtopic.php?t=536
Uh, if you are going to qualify the type of foam, then be completely correct. :)

The studiotips' absorbers wee made from OC 703, a glass fiber, not mineral wool. Confounding the issue more is the density of the absorber being compared.

My EDUCATED GUESS is that a lighter glass fiber would be better, and a mineral wool of any similar density to the glass fiber would be better yet.

Andre
Last edited by AVare on Wed Dec 01, 2004 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Paul Woodlock
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:36 pm
Location: Peterborough UK

Post by Paul Woodlock »

Greetings Andre

Glassfibre slabs ARE mineral wool. Rockwool slabs are also mineral wool.

Hope that helps ;)


Paul
AVare
Confused, but not senile yet
Posts: 2336
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Hanilton, Ontario, Canada

Post by AVare »

Paul Woodlock wrote:Greetings Andre

Glassfibre slabs ARE mineral wool. Rockwool slabs are also mineral wool.

Hope that helps ;)
Aargh :!:

I feel like "Alice In the Looking glass." A word means what someone, somwhere, means at that time thinks it means, nothing more and nothing less.

As has ben discussed in some detail on Studiotips, in europe "mineral wool" s used as a generic term for all mineral based products. Glass is a mineral: silica. In north america, and in the general use on this forum, mineral wool is used as a generic for non-glass based mideral wool products.

I was thinking in the latter meaning when I read your post.

I am getting flashbacks of the thread on studiotips about what "703" refers to. Tying in with that idea, that is why I wrote "OC 703.

Now to check my boot, polish the bonnet and go knock up some girls. :)

Confusing the world;
Andre
Post Reply