Here's one on low-frequency absorbers, including a final design that looks easy to build:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/reports/1992-10.pdf
Any thoughts on this?
More BBC research papers
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 4:02 am
- Location: Port Huron, Michigan, USA
- Contact:
-
- Confused, but not senile yet
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Hanilton, Ontario, Canada
What is there to say? It is the most tested with readily available test data, and enough additional inofrmation that you can make minor changes and still have a good idea of the performance. There is a fairly long thread about it on RO,
http://www.recording.org/postlite17314-bbc+report.html
if you want heavy discussion of the report. The report has some questions about it, but as an in depth study of LF absorbers, and 1992-11 for higher frequency absorbers, they can't be beat.
Enjoy!
Andre
http://www.recording.org/postlite17314-bbc+report.html
if you want heavy discussion of the report. The report has some questions about it, but as an in depth study of LF absorbers, and 1992-11 for higher frequency absorbers, they can't be beat.
Enjoy!
Andre
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 4:02 am
- Location: Port Huron, Michigan, USA
- Contact: