240 square feet rule

Plans and things, layout, style, where do I put my near-fields etc.

Moderators: Aaronw, kendale, John Sayers

johnnykap
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 12:43 am
Location: Greenville, South Carolina

240 square feet rule

Post by johnnykap »

Folks, I am in a situation where I will be contracting with an architect to design our dream house, which will have a room dedicated for my recording/jamming studio.

I had been reading the forum in the past as a lurker and saw references indicating that if you are designing a room, you need to allocate at least 240 square feet for it to have a chance of sounding decent.

I have gone back and cannot find those references using the search function.

Can someone chime in on that "rule" or where I can find more info about it on the site? Thanks. I am simply looking to allocate the required room size up front and will have the actual design of the room done at the appropriate time. We are in the bubble planning phase, early days.
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: 240 square feet rule

Post by John Sayers »

I know of no such rule. Choose a size that suits your need.
cheers
john
John Sayers Productions

If this site helps you build your studio please use the Donate button.
Gregwor
Moderator
Posts: 1501
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:03 pm
Location: St. Albert, Alberta, Canada

Re: 240 square feet rule

Post by Gregwor »

Can someone chime in on that "rule" or where I can find more info about it on the site?
ITU-R BS.1116-3 states the following for a control room:

For monophonic or two-channel stereophonic reproduction: 20-60 m2.
For multichannel stereophonic or advanced sound system reproduction: 30-70 m2.

For a live room, typically, the bigger the better but as John said, make it a size that works for you (budget, time frame to build, etc, etc)

Greg
It appears that you've made the mistake most people do. You started building without consulting this forum.
anodivirta
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 6:41 pm
Location: Finland

Re: 240 square feet rule

Post by anodivirta »

I dont want to hijack this topic, but Ive been also wondering since reading these "rules" on size and shape of the rooms
that in GENERAL in smallish home studios(mostly for mixing and some small vocal etc recordings):

-is it better to try get your room big as possible even if you sacrife the perfect ratios (something like Height=1, length=1.6, width=1.25?)?

-is it good to try to make angled walls etc at cost of loosing some space or just try to make the room big as you can?

-If you only have something like 20m2 of space, is there any point of trying to split that into vocal booth+mixing room or again maximize the space by making a one "big" room?
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: 240 square feet rule

Post by John Sayers »

"-is it better to try get your room big as possible even if you sacrife the perfect ratios"

Tom Hidley, the father of control room design would start with a 35' x 35' square room!!
It's the internal walls and his treatment which determined the sound of his rooms.

cheers
john
John Sayers Productions

If this site helps you build your studio please use the Donate button.
Post Reply