The best way to treat a hyrbrid control room / studio

Plans and things, layout, style, where do I put my near-fields etc.

Moderators: Aaronw, kendale, John Sayers

buttermuffin
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 4:37 am
Location: Paris

The best way to treat a hyrbrid control room / studio

Post by buttermuffin »

I have read about this topic a lot on other forums and was actually decided on how I was going to treat my control room / live room but then I found this site and now I want to post this here because I am discovering that the advice here is a notch above the rest.

I know having separate rooms is best but for those of us without the real estate space, how can we treat our rooms so that there is a decent sweet spot for mixing and so that what we record in the room sounds good too?

In a nutshell, I was recommended to use thick low density fluffy absorption across the entire room while adding wooden studs/slats on the top to bring back some high frequencies.

My inner leaf will be around 7m X 5m with a 2.8m ceiling and I hope to record banjo, acoustic guitar and vocals in my room while being able to mix too :)

thanks in advance! :)
Soundman2020
Site Admin
Posts: 11938
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Re: The best way to treat a hyrbrid control room / studio

Post by Soundman2020 »

but then I found this site and now I want to post this here because I am discovering that the advice here is a notch above the rest.
Thank you! (We think so too...)
how can we treat our rooms so that there is a decent sweet spot for mixing and so that what we record in the room sounds good too?
As with many of the answers you'll see here about complex acoustic questions, the truth is; "It depends". It depends on many factors, such as the size of the room, the instruments to be recorded, and the level of precision that you want, as both a control room AND a tracking room.

I say that up front, because you are asking about a very specific case, and the treatment for YOUR case is NOT the same as what someone else might need for a different situation. So somebody else reading your thread in the future won't think: "Well, Stuart said to do that for buttermuffin, so I'll do it in my room too", then the room turns out terrible! This is advice for YOUR room not for ALL rooms.

Your room is nice and large "around 7m X 5m with a 2.8m ceiling". 3m2 floor area with a reasonably high ceiling, bodes very well for having a room that can be good for both mixing AND tracking. That's very good. Somebody else who wants to do the same but has a tiny closet-sized room with a low ceiling is NOT going to get the same results you can, simply because of the good size of your room. The bigger it is, the easier it is to treat. Why? Because the larger a room is, the longer the natural-sounding decay needs to be, and in general longer decay is better for recording instruments. And secondly, a higher ceiling is pretty much always better for instruments, because they nee "air" to sound good.
I hope to record banjo, acoustic guitar and vocals in my room
Excellent! Those three just happen to have similar acoustic needs, and all towards the "drier" side of acoustic response.

If you would have said "My room is 3m x 2.5m x 1.9m high, and I want to record drums, trumpets and piano, as well as mixing", my reply would have been very different. Basically, it would have been "forget it: not going to happen".

So in your specific case, you have the basic prerequisites that make it possible to do what you want.

Having said that, you already know that tracking and mixing are two different things, so you can't have one single set of treatment that is excellent for both, regardless of the room. So what you will have to do is to use VARIABLE acoustic treatment. You will need panels on your walls that you can swing around, rotate, flip, slide, open, close, or whatever to change the acoustic repose of the room. With one configuration, the acoustics will be perfect for mixing, and by flipping/rotating/opening/sliding/etc. the panels to another configuration, it will be perfect for tracking.

That's the basic method. Make your treatment variable, but very carefully designed so that in one setup it produces the acoustic response laid out it ITU BS.1116-3, chapter 8, and also carefully designed so that in other setups it produces the acoustic response needed for tracking.
I was recommended to use thick low density fluffy absorption across the entire room while adding wooden studs/slats on the top to bring back some high frequencies
Weeelllll..... Mmmmmm.... sort of! But not really.

There's basically two methods for tuning a room: One is to start out with a purely reflective room: all hard solid walls all around, very bright, very resonant, very harsh, then add treatment devices one by one to damp that down until you attain the correct response. The other approach is to start with a very dead room, very dry, very over-damped, very lifeless, then slowly add treatment devices one by one to add life to the room again, as needed until you attain the correct response. Personally, I prefer the second method: start dead and make it live, but sometimes I do it the other way as well. Here are two examples of rooms that I have done, one starting live then slowly killing it, then other starting dead then slowly livening it up.

Studio Three: Started live, and damped down: http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... =2&t=20471

Another room: Started dead, and livening up: http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... =2&t=21368

The second one is still in progress right now, very nearly finished, but you can see how this process works. The first one is totally completed, and you can see the end product.

So basically, yes, your approach CAN work.... but not entirely for what you want to do!

I would assume that your number one priority is to have a great mixing environment, and the second priority is to have it also usable for tracking? Assuming that is the case, if that were my room I would design it so that the basic initial treatment and tuning makes it into a great mixing room, meeting BS.1116-3 as well as possible, but then make SOME of that treatment variable, so it can be flipped/rotated/etc. to make it more live and increase the decay times, such that is more suitable for tracking guitars, banjos and vocals.

That's the basic concept, but the actual details of doing that are rather complex. It's no easy task to design FIXED acoustic treatment, and far more complicated to design VARIABLE acoustic treatment. It can be done, but it's going to need a lot of careful prediction, analysis, and design to make it work.

So no, just using " thick low density fluffy absorption across the entire room while adding wooden studs/slats" is NOT going to do what you need. Rooms need to be tuned specifically for their purpose, and in your case the purpose is complex. All rooms are different, and all need different tuning (thankfully! If not, then I would be out of a job!). Designing a control room just to BE a control room with perfectly neutral acoustics is already hard: designing it to also be variable is harder still, so this is going to take you quite a bit of time.

But it CAN be done: Here's a room with variable acoustics that I designed for a customer a few years back:

Panels under construction, half open:
Variable-acoustic-01--panels--construction--half-open-SML.jpg
Panels under construction, fully open:
Variable-acoustic-02--panels--construction--fully-open--SML-ENH.JPG
Panels under construction, almost competed:
Variable-acoustic-03--partly-completed--SML-ENH.jpg
Compelted room:
Variable-acoustic-04--room--completed--SML-ENH.jpg
Acoustic response graphs for the room, showing how decay times change for different panel positions:
variable-acoustic-05--acoustic-rt60-plots-all-positions-t20.jpg

- Stuart -
buttermuffin
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 4:37 am
Location: Paris

Re: The best way to treat a hyrbrid control room / studio

Post by buttermuffin »

Hi Stuart, thanks for the reply. I am reading those other threads so it could be a while before I am up to speed since there is a lot of content to read and to understand it all is even harder.

In the meantime, to answer your question, I would prefer a room that sounds great as a live room and is OK for mixing as opposed to an OK live room that is great for mixing. How does this change how I would treat the room? Which approach should I go for, deaden the room then add reflection or start it as a live reflective room and add treatment? Also, Can you please recommend some specific treatment and placement given my requirements?

Adam
Soundman2020
Site Admin
Posts: 11938
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Re: The best way to treat a hyrbrid control room / studio

Post by Soundman2020 »

I am reading those other threads so it could be a while before I am up to speed since there is a lot of content to read and to understand it all is even harder.
Right! It does take a while.... And there's plenty more threads to keep you busy when you are done with those: Right now, there's over fifteen thousand threads on the forum, and over 135 thousand posts. So that should keep you entertained!
I would prefer a room that sounds great as a live room and is OK for mixing as opposed to an OK live room that is great for mixing. How does this change how I would treat the room?
I would still tune it as a control room mostly, then make the "flip" side of that treatment more reflective, less absorptive.
Can you please recommend some specific treatment and placement given my requirements?
I really can't say, as there's no details about your room on this thread...

- Stuart -
buttermuffin
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 4:37 am
Location: Paris

Re: The best way to treat a hyrbrid control room / studio

Post by buttermuffin »

Soundman2020 wrote:
I am reading those other threads so it could be a while before I am up to speed since there is a lot of content to read and to understand it all is even harder.
Right! It does take a while.... And there's plenty more threads to keep you busy when you are done with those: Right now, there's over fifteen thousand threads on the forum, and over 135 thousand posts. So that should keep you entertained!
detained and entertained :) since I would love to get back to making music but you can't rush these things. You know how it is.
I would prefer a room that sounds great as a live room and is OK for mixing as opposed to an OK live room that is great for mixing. How does this change how I would treat the room?
I would still tune it as a control room mostly, then make the "flip" side of that treatment more reflective, less absorptive.
When you say tune it as a control room which of the two methods would you use? AS you said above, one can measure the room after it is built and go from there or deaden the room and then add reflective surfaces / variable treatment to bring back the liveliness. This is where I am stuck, I was going to just deaden the room with a thick perimeter of glass wool and then add some slats across the walls but now I am not sure what the next step is.
Can you please recommend some specific treatment and placement given my requirements?
I really can't say, as there's no details about your room on this thread...
I did supply my room dimensions and I will add a floor plan here for you to look at. The treatment inside I put here in the room is just temporary as I don't know where to start. When I'm finished with the final sheet of drywall, I don't want to be like: Ok what now? In fact, it would be nice to design in the treatments now if possible so I can finish my HVAC which needs to take that into account but if the best approach is to finish building and then measure, I can do that too.

- Stuart -[/quote]
Soundman2020
Site Admin
Posts: 11938
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Re: The best way to treat a hyrbrid control room / studio

Post by Soundman2020 »

When you say tune it as a control room which of the two methods would you use? AS you said above, one can measure the room after it is built and go from there or deaden the room and then add reflective surfaces / variable treatment to bring back the liveliness.
There's two methods for treating any room: Build it live and deaden it, or build it dead and liven it. In both cases you'll need to measure the actual response of the room once it is built, in order to decide on the best plan for treatment. Yes, you can predict the response too, and base your initial treatment on that. but even then it is still better to have a "baseline" measurement of the entirely empty room, for several reasons: 1) It confirms that your predictions are correct... or not, as the case may be! 2) It shows the relative intensities of the major issues, which can very well be different from prediction, even if the actual frequencies are correctly predicted. 3) It allows you to check that each treatment device is working as planned, since you can compare what it was designed to do, with what it actually does. 4) It allows you to see how the overall treatment is advancing at each stage, and see what still needs to be done. 5) Etc.
This is where I am stuck, I was going to just deaden the room with a thick perimeter of glass wool and then add some slats across the walls but now I am not sure what the next step is.
If you want to start with a dead room then liven it up, the easiest way to do that without wasting space is to build the walls and ceiling "inside out". However, if the walls and ceiling are already there, then it doesn't make much sense to use the "start dead" approach, as you'd be wasting a lot of space to achieve that, all around the room. If the room is already there, and already has solid, hard, reflective walls, then it's better to "star live" and slowly damp the room.

Assuming that you do start dead, placing slat walls all around the room can certainly do the trick, but it does need careful calculation to make sure that you are getting the right tuning in the right places. For example, if you have a 200 Hz modal issue between the side walls, then it is pointless trying to deal with that by tuning something on the rear wall! The problem would never go anywhere near the rear wall, so it would never get treated.

So if you do that that approach, be prepared to start figuring things out carefully, regarding where each problem is, and how it can be treated.
When I'm finished with the final sheet of drywall, I don't want to be like: Ok what now? In fact, it would be nice to design in the treatments now if possible
You can do that, yes. However, as I mentioned above, you should still measure the response of the empty room to confirm your predictions, and then perhaps modify the treatment plan once you see how the room is ACTUALLY responding. And once again, if you design variable devices, that gives you a lot of flexibility, since even if your original predictions were off, you can probably still compensate for that by partially adjusting your variable devices.

- Stuart
Post Reply