Casaestudio Project

How thick should my walls be, should I float my floors (and if so, how), why is two leaf mass-air-mass design important, etc.

Moderators: Aaronw, sharward

casaestudio
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:21 am
Location: Galapagar, Madrid. Spain
Contact:

Casaestudio Project

Post by casaestudio »

Hello everyone.
Two friends and I have been reading these forums for a while and I think time has finally come to start our own project. Therefore, it's also time to seek some advice and guidance from the experts in order to plan it properly before we start.

I have to say that we owe the "little" we've learned so far to this forum, as well as to Hispasonic and Gervais' book "Build it like the pros". Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge !!

Before I ask any questions I'll try to give a complete description of the situation, aim and construction plan, so I don't waste your time asking for any additional info afterwards (although I'll be glad to give it if asked!)

So ... this is the project:

Location: 45 km from Madrid, Spain
Website for reference: http://www.casaestudio.es
Budget. about 7000€ DIY
Rooms to apply Isolation to: 2 (Total of 30m2 / 98,42 sq ft) Maybe also the CR.
Rooms to apply acoustic treatment to: 3 (1 control room and 2 studios; 50m2 / 164,04 sq ft)

Building description:
- Detached house not sharing its foundations with any other house.
- NO ONE LIVES in the house, just artists while recordings are taking place… So, some structural sound transmission could be tolerated.
- Ventilated roof with steel trusses and porexpan plates over the ceiling. The roof is about 3m high at the ridge and about 40cm at the eaves.
- Ceilings are made of plasterboard screwed directly to the roof's steel trusses. The ceilings cannot be raised unless a complete re-roofing is undertaken, which is far beyond our budget. We could actually raise the ceiling without redoing the roof but the steel trusses should stay in their position, which would render them visible from inside the house, and that would be a massive structural noise bridge, I guess.
- The “shell” of the house, as well as the wall that divides the garage and the living room are made of brick walls.
- Inside walls made of plasterboard (drywall). I don't know what’s on the inside yet.
- Ceramic tiled floor in the house,
- Concrete tiled floor in the garage
- Closest neighbours are 6 meters (19,68ft) away from the house.
full house envelopes.jpg
The rooms we'll be working on are the current living room (which we are planning to turn into 2 rooms) and the adjacent garage.
envelopes casaestudio.jpg
ACTIVITY TO DATE
The living room has been used as the only live/rehearsal room. It has a chimney acoustically untreated (which acts as a sound tunnel to the outside!). Not special sound insulation at all in the room; just some acoustic treatment.

DIMENSIONS

Living Room: H 2.50m (8,20ft) W 3.60m (11,811ft) L 7.45m (24,44ft) ; 28,18m2 / 92,45 sq ft

Garage: H 2.50m (8,20ft) W 3.67m (12,04ft) L 6m (19,68ft) ; 22.02m2 / 72,24 sq ft

AIM: Stop bothering the neighbours, even if they are in their garden. Some noise would be tolerated but not as loud as it is today.

AIM: To turn the living room into a Control Room and Studio "B", which will be rather dead and used mostly as a vocal booth/amp room. Light/medium isolation will beapplied in Studio "B"

AIM: To turn the garage into Studio "A". Medium/High isolation. This room will be used for tracking drums / full band and as a rehearsal room for a full band (rock).

INSULATION AIM: +-60db for Studio “A” (Garage), +-50db for Studio “B”, +-40db for CR (not sure whether to insulate)

OTHER INFO
We have used the house several times for tracking and it seems that, most of the sound leakage occurs through the ceiling/roof.

PLANNING IN DEPTH

GARAGE (STUDIO "A") : H 2.50m (8,20ft) W 3.67m (12,04ft) L 6m (19,68ft) ; 22.02m2 / 72,24 sq ft

Before we started working on it, the garage had three brickwalls. The front consisted of a large up-and-over wooden garage door. There was a 70cm wide wooden door in the back wall, opposite the large garage door, and a window in the side wall to those two.

We have removed both doors and window, built a wall where the large door used to be with 15cm hollow concrete blocks and the window hole with bricks; both rendered with mortar. We are waiting to put a new door, which will be the only way in to the garage from the living room and to close the hole where the back door used to be, with a new concrete block wall. As we were able to see when we were removing doors and windows, it seems that the brick walls have an air chamber between the bricks and another layer of thinner bricks, but that is hard to tell for sure.

The wall adjacent to the living room is a load bearing wall and will be dealt with carefully as we'll need to place a window and a door in that wall. We'll hire an architect for that. After we make holes in that wall to allow the installation of the door and the window, we might be able to get more information about that wall construction and to know if it really has an air gap between the two leaves of bricks, which is a normal feature in home building in this area. But one thing we can be sure of is that there are flanking paths between those two leaves: there are metal beams at the top of the hole left by the small wooden door we're about to seal, as well as at the top of the window hole we have sealed. The hole where the large garage door used to be is framed all around with heavy steel beams.

The floor is made of concrete thin tiles, which sit on a concrete slab, which in turn rests over sand, I think.

The floor is about 1 step lower than the rest of the house (20/15cm)

The ceiling is made of plasterboard screwed directly to the roof's steel trusses.

At the back of the garage there’s an adjoining tools/machine/ little storage room (3.67m x 1.7m). The boiler and the washing machine will live in there as well. Hopefully that will work as an air lock, adding to the insulation, which would be just as well, since our closest neighbours live about six metres from this wall. This room shares one brick wall with the garage and one brickwall with the CR (current living room). The other two outside walls are made of hollow concrete blocks filled with mortar on both sides. They also share the same ceiling.

Now, the plan is to build a room within a room BUT we want to lose as little in height as we possibly can, since the room is “only” 2,50m high.

- Insulation needed: around 60db, I guess.
- Air conditioning: using Fujitsu ASY 35 UI LLCC
- Air renovation: using a silent air extractor + DIY silencers.

We are contemplating two different approaches and haven't chosen either of them yet:
- Brick/block wall building method.
- Drywall/steel framing method.

OPTION A.-
Drywall building procedure seems to be quite straight forward, cleaner and, maybe, more desirable for non professional builders. Also, the finishing touches would be easier to accomplish.

With drywall we would do something like this: Bolt the wall steel frame to the floor and build with this design: Chovacustic 35 fieltex glued/bolt to the outer leaf (existing envelope walls) - steel frame leaving 10cm air chamber - rockwool 70kg/m3 filling that chamber - drywall 15mm - Chovacustic Viscolam 65 - drywall 15mm. Estimated +-60db attenuation with this system and would "lose" 14cm from each wall.

:?: :?: :roll: :?: :?:

Our main brain crusher is the ceiling, though. We know the insulation of any room is as effective as its weakest leaf... and the ceiling is our biggest challenge.

The ceiling construction method we first thought of was: Chovacoustic 35 Fieltex (pdf attached) bolt to the current drywall - Silent blocks hanging from the current drywall (but attached to the steel truss) - steel frame leaving a 5cm gap - fill that gap with rockwool 70kg/m3 - drywall 15mm - Chovacoustic Viscolam 65 (pdf attached) - drywall 15mm
This way we would lose about 8cm in height. This ceiling method was taken from http://www.hispasonic.com/foros/resumen ... ayo/461553

Then we have came up with other "crazy" ideas such as, wood beams sitting on the air gap of the walls so the ceiling could rest on them and be decoupled from the structure. 8)

We have thought of leaving the floor untreated and laying just a 2mm layer of polyurethane on top of the current tiles and a 7/8mm laminated floor over it. The walls would be bolted to the concrete tiles and slab and the floor would be laid after the walls are finished. Should we do it the other way around?

OPTION B.-
On the other hand, It seems to us that brickwalls would give us better isolation and would be cheaper for us to build, but we would lose more room. Also, the implementation of the air renovation and aircon seems more challenging with bricks (and more importantly, harder to fix or improve afterwards) We have some experience with brick/block building but we are not skilled/experienced with "smooth finishing".. :oops: :roll:

If it were built with bricks, the plan could be this, roughly:
A1.- Eliminate air gap, in case there is one, between the two layers of the existing brick walls in the garage. As said before, we might be able to know if there really is one when we install the door to the garage from the current living room that's becoming Studio B and Control Room. To eliminate the air gap we could fill the space between the walls with sand or mortar (We are guessing but that could be nearly 2'5 cubic metres if the air gap is 5cm thick???... sounds like hard work but it has the advantage of sand being very cheap... 0,03€/kg).

We could also strip the first layer, then plaster the newly exposed bricks. That would give us a slightly wider room, and the possibility of plastering the face to which we wouldn't have access otherwise. The first layer is made of this kind of bricks:
rasillon30154.jpg
(http://almacendemateriales.com/ladrillo ... n30154.jpg)

A2.- To dig a trench through both the existing tiles and the concrete slab along the whole perimeter of the garage in order to lay a good foundation for the new brick walls.

A3.- Build the brick walls and plaster at least the inside of the "room within the room". We don't know if we're going to be able to plaster the side that would be between the two leaves (and hopefully single) air gap. Bricks to be used for these walls:
ladrillo_perforado103.jpg
(http://www.materialesdeconstruccionmadr ... ado103.jpg)

A4.- For the ceiling of the new room, we could install new steel beams resting only on the new walls. These would be 4cm high. The easiest way to close the space between those beams would be to use bricks first and then pour a concrete layer over them, but that would take upsome room height. So, we may go for the denser concrete layer only, with some steel bars inside. Bricks to close the space between those beams:
rasillon40204.jpg
(http://almacendemateriales.com/ladrillo ... n40204.jpg)

A5.- The other layer of double wall on the ceiling would be completed with the same sort of drywall the ceiling had before we started working. The one screwed onto the light steel trusses that hold the roof. Drywall with several layers I guess... maybe up to three 13mm layers, as the concrete on the new room's ceiling is going to be thin and the air gap in the ceiling is going to be about 10cm high.

A6.- There would be rockwool (or another absorbent material) filling the air gap inside the double walls (and ceiling) to some extent, but we still have to decide the better way to do it. We have read on page 172 of the Mastermaster handbook of acoustics by F. Alton Everest that maybe low density mineral fiber balls could be used and we are trying to figure out what that is (maybe what we call "perlita"?). We're also trying to figure out how to get some inches between the rockwool and the walls, as we have read it could lead to the same results as using thicker rookwool. All this rockwall installation seems harder to build with bricks than with drywalls, as we've been told that rockwool can't be in contact with water or it will not work... even if it gets dry again... does rockwool "die" when it gets wet?

A7.- All the inner walls and ceiling of the room would be painted to cover the mortar.

A8.- The floor would be untreated. The existing tiles could serve as a base for new tiles or a non floating wooden floor as in Option B

STUDIO "B"
This room will be used mainly as a vocal booth/isolated space for other acoustic instruments during live sessions (i.e. accordion, harmonica, light percussion, vocals...).
The sound pressure in this room will not be as high as in Studio "A"... But, who knows if a drum kit could ever be played in this room... maybe if need be! It will surely be used as an amp room as well, though.

We would strip the existing drywall inner leaves and leave the outer leaves as they are.
We'll probably be using drywall in this room, but maybe we'll go for 5cm air chamber instead of 10cm. The system would be: existing walls as outer leaves - 5cm air chamber filled with 70kg/m3 rockwool - drywall 15mm - Viscolam 65 - drywall 15mm. +- 50db attenuation expected.

The new wall between CR and Studio "B" would be a double wall: drywall 15mm - viscolam 65 - drywall 15mm - rockwool 70kg/m3 5cm - rockwool 70kg/m3 5 cm - drywall 15mm - viscolam 65 - drywall 15mm.

The ceiling and floor would be as in studio "A".

This room has quite a large double glass door, which connects the current living room with the outside porch and we are still figuring out what to do with it... It's lovely to have some sun light in so, we are planning on enclosing the porch with glass in the future (a conservatory of sorts). This could occasionally be used to track other acoustic instruments when needed...

As far as ventilation is concerned, we still don't know where the best place for the silencer boxes is. IOW whether to put them inside or outside the house., or even inside the ventilated roof. Should it be inside, what is the best place? Any info on that will be greatly appreciated!

CONTROL ROOM
cr rough plan.jpg
This is still under its early planning stage. The dimensions chosen for it are taken from one of the golden ratios I've found: 1:1.4:2.1 **Update** will change it to 1:1.4:1.9, the best and prefered ratio for Louden.
Anyways, I'm still looking for a lot of answers regarding its design and I'm still reading a lot. I'll come back with fewer questions in a few days, I'm sure.
The rough drawings you see are just that: very rough.
I still don't know whether I should isolate it at all (if I do it I won't be able to comply with the ratio I've chosen) and I haven´t done much planning of the acoustic solutions to integrate in order to tune it right... I'm sure I'll come up with something! I've always treated my mixing rooms by ear and always end up finding my way learning how their sound was and interpreted correctly after some time. This is the first time I do a design before hand... :)

Questions:
We would love to know opinions and suggestions for the isolation of the rooms.
I think it would be quite hard to install an acoustic door on a drywall so we thought on installing 2 sets of glass slide doors in between Studio A and B. Any suggestion?
Regarding the shape of the rooms, do you think it's desirable to destroy parallelisms between walls? I'm very lost at designing them. I would really want to come up with a "sweet spot" to place the drumset in Studio A... Any advise on the geometry of the room? Should I do that in the acoustic conditioning stage better?
Knowing we have access to the ventilated roof, Is it recommended to place the air exchange silencers there?

I'm away from home at the moment but will be back tomorrow and I'll try to get you fresh pictures from the rooms.

As we say in Spain, this post is a BRICK... sorry. I just hope you can digest it well. A thousand "thank yous" for that!!

Salud!

Niko (Silvestre, and Marcio)
All in all is all we all are. (All apologies, Nirvana)
casaestudio
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:21 am
Location: Galapagar, Madrid. Spain
Contact:

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by casaestudio »

Few more pictures.

Downloading SketchUp... more plans to come soon.

Roof trusses.
ventilated roof trusses1.jpg
Wall separating living room and garage (notice the fireplace on the left) That might stay in the control room design...
Living room wall to garage.jpg
Garage pics
garage gate and window gaps closed.jpg
garage door gap detail.jpg
garage door gap.jpg
All in all is all we all are. (All apologies, Nirvana)
Soundman2020
Site Admin
Posts: 11938
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Soundman2020 »

INSULATION AIM: +-60db for Studio “A” (Garage), +-50db for Studio “B”, +-40db for CR (not sure whether to insulate)
Your goals are attainable, but 60 dB is pretty much the limit you can expect for typical home studio / project studio construction, such as yours. And yes, I would definitely isolate the CR to the same level as LR-B, at least.
We have used the house several times for tracking and it seems that, most of the sound leakage occurs through the ceiling/roof.
That is very typically the case with most houses. Losses through the roof, windows, doors and HVAC system are the major culprits, almost always.
We have removed both doors and window, built a wall where the large door used to be with 15cm hollow concrete blocks and the window hole with bricks; both rendered with mortar.
So the entire surface of those three walls is rendered now? Excellent. That's a great start. Now seal the surface with a good quality masonry sealant ("sellante de cal" is the type I normally use here in Chile). In fact, any decent paint that adheres well to cement will work. The purpose is to seal the porous surface air-tight.
But one thing we can be sure of is that there are flanking paths between those two leaves:
In that case, I would assume that the wall is acting more like a single-leaf wall, and do all the math based on that assumption. You have plenty of mass in those walls, so you should be able to get excellent isolation.
The floor is made of concrete thin tiles, which sit on a concrete slab, which in turn rests over sand, I think.
Excellent! :thu:
The ceiling is made of plasterboard screwed directly to the roof's steel trusses.
Not so good... :(
- Air conditioning: using Fujitsu ASY 35 UI LLCC
- Air renovation: using a silent air extractor + DIY silencers.
Sounds good. What are the specs on that air conditioner? Do you have a link?
Drywall building procedure seems to be quite straight forward, cleaner and, maybe, more desirable for non professional builders. Also, the finishing touches would be easier to accomplish.
Correct.
Chovacustic 35 fieltex glued/bolt to the outer leaf (existing envelope walls) -
:!: :roll: :ahh: Did you read the information on that product provided by the manufacturer in their own data sheet? That's not what it is meant for, and would not help you at all. http://chova.com/documentacion/fichas-t ... tex-v2.pdf "Aislamiento acústico de todo tipo de conducciones, tanto de aire como de agua." It will work very well in that application, as well as possible helping a but to isolate slabs, but not as wall isolation. There's no point to it in that application.
rockwool 70kg/m3 filling that chamber
The density is too high. You will not get good isolation in low frequencies from that. The density should be around 50kg/m3 for mineral wool, or 30 kg/m3 for fiberglass.
drywall 15mm - Chovacustic Viscolam 65 - drywall 15mm.
Why do you want the Viscolam 65 in there? It isn't a CLD, and only appears to add mass and seal the surface. But that's an expensive product,and I don't see the need for it in your situation. You say you want about 60 dB isolation for your room. You already have a thick, heavy, sealed and plastered brick wall as your outer leaf. Two layers of 15mm drywall with an air gap of 15cm filled with 30 kg/m3 fiberglass will get you to that point. If you want to be certain, then go for three layers of 15mm drywall, or put a full application of Green Glue between your two layers. Either one will get you a bit more than 60 dB, in theory.

However, that's just the walls. It does not matter how good your wall isolation is, if you don't also get the same form your ceiling, windows, doors, HVAC and electrical systems. Walls are relatively easy to isolate, windows a bit harder, doors and ceilings much harder, and HVAC harder still.
Our main brain crusher is the ceiling, though. We know the insulation of any room is as effective as its weakest leaf... and the ceiling is our biggest challenge.
Right! That is, indeed, a big weak point.
This ceiling method was taken from
Mmmm.... wellll.... I think I'll refrain from commenting on that... :) I'm sure they got reasonable isolation in there, but the amount of money the spent on unnecessary materials, and the time it took to apply them.... Mmmmm..... welll..... :shock:
Then we have came up with other "crazy" ideas such as, wood beams sitting on the air gap of the walls so the ceiling could rest on them and be decoupled from the structure.
Not crazy at all! That is, indeed, the correct way to do it. For proper isolation, the inner-leaf ceiling should rest ONLY on the inner-leaf walls, and all of that entire inner-leaf should be fully separate from the outer leaf: not touching at any point. Not even one nail.
We have thought of leaving the floor untreated and laying just a 2mm layer of polyurethane on top of the current tiles and a 7/8mm laminated floor over it. The walls would be bolted to the concrete tiles and slab and the floor would be laid after the walls are finished.
Perfect! That is, indeed, the correct way to do it.
A2.- To dig a trench through both the existing tiles and the concrete slab along the whole perimeter of the garage in order to lay a good foundation for the new brick walls.
... and how would you then support the exposed edges of the existing slab? you can't just leave that with no foundation below.... You'd have to dig back under it, and pour a new foundation to support that. Lot's of work! Expensive...
For the ceiling of the new room, we could install new steel beams resting only on the new walls. These would be 4cm high.
How did you determine that? What numbers did you use for the dead load and live load? What span? What deflection?
he easiest way to close the space between those beams would be to use bricks first and then pour a concrete layer over them,
This is a ceiling we are talking about: How would you get access to the top of that to be able to pour concrete on it?
The one screwed onto the light steel trusses that hold the roof
What dimensions? Same as above: what span? What live load? What dead load? What deflection?
All this rockwall installation seems harder to build with bricks than with drywalls,
Yep...
as we've been told that rockwool can't be in contact with water or it will not work...
Who told you that? Do you have a link? Rockwool is made from.. well... ROCK! It is spun from mineral fibers that often come from slag, produced in various types of blast furnace. Basically, it is the left-over molten rock that is not wanted, after the metal has been extracted from it. Basically, it is rock. As far as I know, rock still remains as rock after it gets wet and dries again. There might be a problem if the mineral wool you use is made with a water-soluble binder, so check the data sheets for the specific product you have in mind. The data sheets will tell you about that, and what the possible issues would be if the product got wet then dried out again.

Don't rely on "heresay": "Somebody tole me...." "I heard that...". Check out the fact for yourself, for the actual specific product that you plan to use. If you can't find specs for it published by the manufacturer, then don't use that product! Only use products that you have full documentation form showing that it will work as planned in your application. Don't guess.
A7.- All the inner walls and ceiling of the room would be painted to cover the mortar.
:thu: Correct!
A8.- The floor would be untreated. The existing tiles could serve as a base for new tiles or a non floating wooden floor
:thu: Correct!
We'll probably be using drywall in this room, but maybe we'll go for 5cm air chamber instead of 10cm.
:shock: Why? Did you do that math? Are you aware that your low frequency isolation would suffer greatly from having such a high MSM resonant frequency in that wall system? Thin air gap = high resonant frequency = poor isolation....

Never have less than 10cm air gap.
The system would be: existing walls as outer leaves - 5cm air chamber filled with 70kg/m3 rockwool - drywall 15mm - Viscolam 65 - drywall 15mm. +- 50db attenuation expected.
I would suggest something more like: Existing wall - 10cm air gap filled with 30 kg/m3 fiberglass insulation - 2 layers of 15mm fire-rated drywall. Isolation of around 55 dB.
The new wall between CR and Studio "B"
I don't see how you would accomplish that and still have each room built as a fully-decoupled single-leaf structure. Please show your full SketchUp model. I have a feeling that you are missing something important here...
This room has quite a large double glass door,
Do yo mean "double glass door" in the sense that there is a single door that has a double glazed unit mounted in it? Or do you mean that there are two doors,side by side, and each of them has a single pane of glass in it? That is two very different things....

Either way, that's a major weak point. It is pretty hard to get 60 dB of isolation, or 50 db, or even 40 dB, when you have a normal domestic operable door involved.
As far as ventilation is concerned, we still don't know where the best place for the silencer boxes is.
You will need two silencer boxes on each duct, in each room. One where the duct penetrates the outer-leaf of each room, and one where it penetrates the inner-leaf. And of course you need two ducts per room: one for bringing fresh air in, one for taking stale air out.
IOW whether to put them inside or outside the house.,
The boxes that handle the penetration of the outer leaf can either be outside the outer leaf, or in between the outer leaf and the inner leaf, in the air gap (if it is big enough).

The boxes that handle the penetration of the inner leaf can either be inside the inner-leaf (inside each room), or in between the outer leaf and the inner leaf, in the air gap (if it is big enough).
CONTROL ROOM
You re wasting space with shape.
will change it to 1:1.4:1.9, the best and prefered ratio for Louden.
Why did you choose that one, and not one of the others?

Also, your room is not rectangular, so simple ratios do not apply. The are only applicable to rooms that have six sides (4 walls, floor, ceiling) which are mutually parallel to each other. You show a room that has 8 sides (six walls, floor,ceiling), and at least six of those are not parallel to each other. So you cannot use ratios or simple room mode calculators to predict the modal response of your room.
I still don't know whether I should isolate it at all
Yes, absolutely, and without any question.
if I do it I won't be able to comply with the ratio I've chosen
Why not? I don't understand the reason for that.
I've always treated my mixing rooms by ear
:shock: bad idea: The human ear does not have the ability to do that. It cannot determine that there is an SBIR problem at the mix position at 73.5 Hz, nor that there is a modal issue in the 0.x.0 direction at 97.1 Hz, nor that there is comb filtering caused by a floor bounce at 105 Hz, nor that there is a reflection from the right speaker on the left side wall that is smearing the psycho-acoustic perception of directionality, nor that there is discrepancy between the decay times between the 150 Hz band and the bands on either side, nor that there is an imbalance of 3 dB between the levels of the two channels in the upper mid range, nor that there is a sudden phase shift in the room response to the left speaker at 43 Hz, nor....

All your brain can tell you about that is that "it sounds wrong". You might even be able to say "the bass is not tight", or "the high end is tinny", or "the vocals sound thin", or "bass guitars are muddy", but your brain does not have the capability of determining what the problem actually is, and if you don't know what it is then you can't fix it.

the ONLY way to tune a control room is to analyze its empty response with a tool such as REW,compare the results to the specifications in BS.1116-2 (or EBU TECH-3276), then design specific treatment for each issue. When you do that right, this is the result: http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... =2&t=20471 When you do that wrong, fiddling by ear, trial and error, and guessing, this is the result: http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=20410 Which result would you rather have? :)
I think it would be quite hard to install an acoustic door on a drywall
Why?
BRAUS-CR-to-door_0437.JPG
door-seals-in-Photo 28-02-2016 3 51 31 pm-SML.jpg
That's an acoustic door in a drywall inner-leaf, that I designed for a customer in Australia. Along with it's companion in the outer leaf (brick, just lke yours), that gets about 60 dB of isolation.
so we thought on installing 2 sets of glass slide doors in between Studio A and B. Any suggestion?
That can work, provided that you use proper acoustic rated sliding glass doors.
Regarding the shape of the rooms, do you think it's desirable to destroy parallelisms between walls?
No. It wastes space, and it is a myth that you need to do that, and you need to splay them by 12° if you want to eliminate flutter echo like that, and it wastes space. The ONLY reason why you would validly need to angle your walls, is if you are following a design concept for your control room that requires it, such as RFZ, CID, NER, or something similar. In that case, yes, you do need to angle some of the walls, and that has to be done at certain specific angles.

You MIGHT also want to do that if you anticipate certain problems in your live rooms, or are trying to achieve a certain sound.

Consider this: Most people consider Abbey Road to be among the best studios in the world. Look a the plans: there is not one single angled wall in the entire building: All of the rooms are rectangular....

In other words, you don't need to angle walls to get good acoustics. You can if you want, or if you are aiming for a certain sound, or if you are building an RFX style control room (which is highly recommended, for sure!).
As we say in Spain, this post is a BRICK...
Ojalá que mi respuesta no es demasiado "pesado" ! :)



- Stuart -
Silvestre
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 2:05 am
Location: Madrid (Spain)

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Silvestre »

Hi, Stuart,

Thank you so much

I'm Silvestre, owner of a pair of the hands (and maybe even a brain) involved in the construction of this studio.

We owe you some updates and some new information we have come aware as we were working on it... and we would try to write a longer post later.
We have removed both doors and window, built a wall where the large door used to be with 15cm hollow concrete blocks and the window hole with bricks; both rendered with mortar.
So the entire surface of those three walls is rendered now? Excellent. That's a great start. Now seal the surface with a good quality masonry sealant ("sellante de cal" is the type I normally use here in Chile). In fact, any decent paint that adheres well to cement will work. The purpose is to seal the porous surface air-tight.
But one thing we can be sure of is that there are flanking paths between those two leaves:
In that case, I would assume that the wall is acting more like a single-leaf wall, and do all the math based on that assumption. You have plenty of mass in those walls, so you should be able to get excellent isolation.
We spent one morning guessing which of the garage walls were made of a single leaf of bricks and which ones were two leaves with a poor air gap and flaking paths... we were lucky to find out that the longer walls in the garaje were made of a single leaf of bricks and that only the short walls (the one with the garaje gate now sealed with cinder blocks, and the one in front of it at the rear side of the garage) were two "poorly built" leaves.

That same morning we were able to split the inner bricks leaf to make those shorter walls a real single-leaf wall... and three days ago we begun to build a new layer of bricks to fill the gap at the sides of the sealed garaje door in one of those walls.

I'm going to try to attach some pictures of that.

The result is a thicker single leaf wall with an extra mass of around 170kg/m2
Then we have came up with other "crazy" ideas such as, wood beams sitting on the air gap of the walls so the ceiling could rest on them and be decoupled from the structure.
Not crazy at all! That is, indeed, the correct way to do it. For proper isolation, the inner-leaf ceiling should rest ONLY on the inner-leaf walls, and all of that entire inner-leaf should be fully separate from the outer leaf: not touching at any point. Not even one nail.
That seems to be our choice now... the new ceiling would be resting only on the inner-leaf walls that seem to end being brick walls again: 170kg/m2 and half the price of a drywall leaf...

... as we plan to leave a 20cm air gap between brick leaves we think the resonance frequency of that double wall would go down to 20hz... but

... we won't be able to match the potential of those walls in an inmediate future (this year) by building a ceiling that isolates a similar way than those double walls with both leaves made of brick... we're forced to drywall construction for the ceilings, but resting on the inner brick walls.
The new wall between CR and Studio "B"
I don't see how you would accomplish that and still have each room built as a fully-decoupled single-leaf structure. Please show your full SketchUp model. I have a feeling that you are missing something important here...
I think I get the thing you're worried about... I think we cannot avoid to deal with three leaves to some extent. I'm going to attach a rough (and very simple) drawing of the walls we are dealing with (black lines on the paper) and the inner walls we want to build (red lines)

That make three leaves in two sections of a wall... both sections are 180cm long (and a height of 250cm)
This room has quite a large double glass door,
Do yo mean "double glass door" in the sense that there is a single door that has a double glazed unit mounted in it? Or do you mean that there are two doors,side by side, and each of them has a single pane of glass in it? That is two very different things....

Either way, that's a major weak point. It is pretty hard to get 60 dB of isolation, or 50 db, or even 40 dB, when you have a normal domestic operable door involved.
[/quote]

The door is going to be substituted... it has double glass (I think maybe 16mm of air gap between each glass) and it has two doors closing one toward the other...

I think you could see it in some of the pictures I'm going to add to illustrate what we are doing (as part of the update and as a humble contribution to the wonderful legacy of information you guys have here)

Please, excuse my grammar, vocabulary and all the rest... and my rush ending this post (woke up early this sturday morning to study with my guitar and... here I am... stuck in the middle with you)

A big hug to you Stuart and lots of thanks for your support.
Last edited by Silvestre on Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Silvestre
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 2:05 am
Location: Madrid (Spain)

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Silvestre »

Some pictures of the garage door... now sealed and the brick wall fillng the gap the original wall had
Silvestre
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 2:05 am
Location: Madrid (Spain)

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Silvestre »

The silliest drawing...
dibujo sencillote.jpg
inner leaf, red lines... existing leaf, black lines

Two rooms within the actual living room (left side of the picture): control room and not-too-tiny room

Another room within the actual garage (right side of the picture): not-so-small room

You can see the three leaves involved... but we cannot get rid of that wall between actual the garaje and the actual living room
muro garaje.jpg
The whole house is supported in that kind of steel frame you can see in the pictures... instead of th more frequent brick construction we had in this area, the house got to follow the original steel-framing way of building that (we recently notice) is a common feature in other countries
Last edited by Silvestre on Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Silvestre
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 2:05 am
Location: Madrid (Spain)

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Silvestre »

Our master, Nico, at the famous double glass double door
Silvestre
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 2:05 am
Location: Madrid (Spain)

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Silvestre »

Several stages of the process of splitting wall layers that compromised the isolation and the design of the studio rooms
Silvestre
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 2:05 am
Location: Madrid (Spain)

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Silvestre »

As you can see, we have a certain amount of work ahead and as long as we have nearly just begun to understand how the studio design has to be done, our ideas about what's to be done next may change in a lapse of hours

But after so many options taken into consideration, it seems that the one I so roughly draw with a few lines is the one that allows us to cover a few points considered a necessity of Nico's studio:

1.- The big room in the garage might be rented for band rehersals that should not have access to the CR.
2.- Visual contact from CR to both studio rooms... and also between studio rooms
3.- The fewer the doors to access everywere in the studio, the better... there's the money factor involved here, too.
4.- Two studio rooms and not only one. It's an idea that has to be with the work in the studio, but alsowith the fact that rooms could be used to teach classes, so maybe It would be a hindrance to have just one...

I don't know if I can give a better sketch or drawing or whatever to help define the design we're happier with right now...

Maybe some pictures would cover that explanation and give a bit of sense to the proposition:

Air gaps between (both made of brick) walls would still be 20cm... the small room maximum dimensions would be 230cm(height)x170cmx380cm

The control room maximum dimensions would be 230cm (Height)x 300cm x 418cm

There would be a corridor to give way to the studio A door(s) in the brick wall we have yet to break. Studio A would also be a room within a room... the former room being the garage, this time...

The corridor would divide the living room in two and would be a 100cm X 360cm aprox. space that completes the air gap around the CR and around the studio B small room... and also between them... one would be walking along the air gap here... :? :roll:

Maximum studio A (garage room) dimensions would be 230cm (Height)x 300cm x 540cm

This option could be done with just four doors: one into the studio B, one into the CR, and two more into the garage room (Studio A)

As long as we cannot see any other design that involves isolation in every room and that could get us away from three-leaves-walls systems, this seems the only option that fits all needs.

Thanks once again for your patience and support.
Soundman2020
Site Admin
Posts: 11938
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Soundman2020 »

Hi there Silvestre! It's great that all of you are here on the forum, and posting together.
we were lucky to find out that the longer walls in the garaje were made of a single leaf of bricks and that only the short walls (the one with the garaje gate now sealed with cinder blocks, and the one in front of it at the rear side of the garage) were two "poorly built" leaves
Excellent. Those are all high mass walls, so you should have no problems with isolation there, provided that you build the rest correctly.
The result is a thicker single leaf wall with an extra mass of around 170kg/m2
How thick is the brick? To get a surface density of 170 kg/m3, it must be only about 75mm thick. Is that correct? That seems rather thin for a brick wall...
brick walls again: 170kg/m2 and half the price of a drywall leaf...
Great! If brick works out cheaper than drywall where you live, that's excellent. It will give you better isolation too.
... as we plan to leave a 20cm air gap between brick leaves
OK, here's the problem when you build both of your leaves as brick. You have to be very, very, VERY careful that no mortar falls down the back, between the two leaves. It can easily create a flanking path across the cavity, which would degrade your isolation. So your bricklayers will have to work very carefully to ensure that they only put enough mortar on each brick so that it cannot squeeze out the back and spill over.

And of course, you have to put insulation in that cavity as well. Insulation is a large part of the MSM system. So they also have to be careful to not damage the insulation as they are building the wall right in front of it.
... as we plan to leave a 20cm air gap between brick leaves we think the resonance frequency of that double wall would go down to 20hz..
Theoretically, if you build that correctly, the MSM resonant frequency would be about 11 Hz, the wall will start isolating above about 15 Hz, will isolate well from about 21 Hz upwards. That's really good for a home studio. The theoretical total isolation would be about 63 dB. However! That assumes you also do the ceiling, doors, windows and HVAC system to the same level...
... we won't be able to match the potential of those walls in an inmediate future (this year) by building a ceiling that isolates a similar way than those double walls with both leaves made of brick... we're forced to drywall construction for the ceilings, but resting on the inner brick walls.
Right, but you can still get it to be pretty good. Let's take a closer look at the ceiling / roof that you already have up there, to see how we can optimize it for maximum isolation. It would be a shame to have such excellent isolation in those walls that you are building so well, but then lose it all through a poor ceiling. Please post more information about the existing ceiling / roof.
think we cannot avoid to deal with three leaves to some extent. I'm going to attach a rough (and very simple) drawing of the walls we are dealing with (black lines on the paper) and the inner walls we want to build (red lines) .... The silliest drawing...
OK, I see what you are saying. That "black line" existing wall forces you to have a three-leaf wall in that area.

Fortunately, your walls are very massive, so you will still be OK with that 3-leaf issue there. The resonant frequencies of that area will be about half an octave higher than for the places where it is 2-leaf. So there's no problem here.
The door is going to be substituted... it has double glass (I think maybe 16mm of air gap between each glass) and it has two doors closing one toward the other...
It would be nice to have the natural light from that door, so perhaps you could replace it with an acoustic-rated sliding glass door, then put another identical one in the inner leaf. Leave a larger air gap between those two, and have plenty of exposed insulation around the edges. Make sure that the glass is single-leaf laminated glass in both doors, as thick as you can afford, but at least 10mm+10mm with acoustic PVB interlayer. That will be pretty expensive, though!
A big hug to you Stuart and lots of thanks for your support.
:thu:


- Stuart -
Soundman2020
Site Admin
Posts: 11938
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Soundman2020 »

Oops! I see you posted more info while I was typing the above! I'll take a look at that, and add some more replies...

- Stuart -
Silvestre
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 2:05 am
Location: Madrid (Spain)

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Silvestre »

Soundman2020 wrote:
The result is a thicker single leaf wall with an extra mass of around 170kg/m2
How thick is the brick? To get a surface density of 170 kg/m3, it must be only about 75mm thick. Is that correct? That seems rather thin for a brick wall...
You are absolutely right, Stuart: the brick is 25mmx11mmx7mm (called "ladrillo tosco", here in Spain)... we have placed it the "wrong" way on its side, no on its bottom... but we are sticking it right to the mortar we're using to render the bricks unplastered we found when we splitted the (brick or drywall) layers in the former walls...

We would use it the right way and give the inner wall a width of 11 or 12mm. I think that would give us 30 bricks per squere meter instead of the aproximately 22 that we are putting ("the wrong way") into the existing wall between living room and garage with NO air gap.

We have checked the weight of some "tosco" bricks... and we believed that a wall with 30 bricks per square meter could be even heavier than 170kg/m2... maybe up to 200kg/m2... which is still better for us

As for ceillings... we're about to give that option we talk before a more serious approach:
casaestudio wrote:A4.- For the ceiling of the new room, we could install new steel beams resting only on the new walls. These would be 4cm high. The easiest way to close the space between those beams would be to use bricks first and then pour a concrete layer over them, but that would take upsome room height. So, we may go for the denser concrete layer only, with some steel bars inside. Bricks to close the space between those beams:
Attachment:
rasillon40204.jpg
rasillon40204.jpg [ 5.39 KiB | Viewed 64 times ]
(http://almacendemateriales.com/ladrillo ... n40204.jpg)

A5.- The other layer of double wall on the ceiling would be completed with the same sort of drywall the ceiling had before we started working. The one screwed onto the light steel trusses that hold the roof. Drywall with several layers I guess... maybe up to three 13mm layers, as the concrete on the new room's ceiling is going to be thin and the air gap in the ceiling is going to be about 10cm high.
We have found a neighbour that's been building his own home for years and is going to help with the ceilling... to get us the right beams for the mass we expect to pour over the bricks...

Ah... We have access to the roof to do so... to pour the concrete above... we have to attach some pictures of that

I'lll try to do it as soon as I can

Thank you again and again and...
Last edited by Silvestre on Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Soundman2020
Site Admin
Posts: 11938
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Soundman2020 »

As you can see, we have a certain amount of work ahead and as long as we have nearly just begun to understand how the studio design has to be done, our ideas about what's to be done next may change in a lapse of hours
Please don't take this the wrong way, and I do understand that you guys are anxious and excited to get this place finished fast, but the very best advice I can give right now is one word: STOP! Don't do any more building yet. You are not ready.

Here's why; You don't have a plan! That is a major mistake in studio building. Probably the biggest possible error you could make is to not have a full, complete, detailed plan before you start building. If you try to design it as you go along "al vuelo", you will fail. You won't fail to have a studio, but you will fail to have a good studio. At best, you will have a mediocre studio. You will be forced to do things that make no sense as you go along and run into problems that you would have seen in advance and fixed on paper. I can tell you this, without any doubt, from experience. There are many such studios documented right here on the forum, of people who rushed ahead and built, then had to start breaking things down again to fix problems, and having to make major compromises because they could not undo some things.

Don't be like them!

Stop building right now, and start designing.

There are many, many issues I see in your situation that you have not taken into account, and that will bite you later. Among them, the big ones are that you have not even decided what control room design concept you want to follow, you have no idea what the acoustic issues will be in the rooms, nor how to compensate for them in construction. You have no plan for HVAC or for electrical, and those are two very major parts of studio design. When I am designing a studio for a customer, it often takes me the same amount of time to design the HVAC system as it does to design the entire rest of the studio, from foundations to roof! It's a BIG issue. You also don't have any plan for your ceilings, doors, or windows, which are three other major issues.

So that would be my number one advice to you guys right now. Put your tools down, and pick up a pen, a calculator, and couple of books on acoustics and studio design. If you carry on now without first designing it completely, in full detail, it will NEVER be a good studio. It will be mediocre,and full of compromises. I have see this happen many times over: those cases where the people ignored the advice and just rushed ahead have ALWAYS turned out lousy. And those cases where the people listened, stopped, learned, designed, and did it properly, have ALWAYS worked out very well. I linked you to the Studio Three thread yesterday: that is one of those cases: The studio owner (Rod) realized he was out of his depth after he had already built a lot of stuff. Fortunately, he stopped and hired me to design it for him. It took a lot of extra time, but he now has one of the best studios you'll ever see.

I do hope you'll be like Rod!
I don't know if I can give a better sketch or drawing or whatever to help define the design we're happier with right now...
What I would really like to see, is a complete SketchUp model of the entire studio, in full detail, showing the full layout for the control room, with the correct geometry, speakers and mix position in the optimal locations, correct treatment in the correct places, no problems with doors interfering with treatment, equipment, sight-lines or traffic flow, correct dimensioning and positioning of the HVAC ducts, silencer boxes, fans, dampers, intakes, exhausts, HRV, AHU, heat pump, piping, drains, etc., all of which is correctly sized to provide the correct air flow volume at the correct rate and the correct velocity for each room, in order to attain the correct NR or NC conditions, while also providing the correct de- humidification and correct cooling for each room, taking into full account the sensible heat load and latent heat load, occupancy, volume, climate, and all other factors. That's what I'd like to see! If you don't have all of that in place, then you should not lay even one more brick until you do.
The control room maximum dimensions would be 230cm (Height)x 300cm x 418cm
that is reasonably close to Louden's second ratio, but the floor area is only about 60% of the recommended size in ITU and EBU, and the volume is 69% of the recommended minimum volume for a control room. What precautions are you taking in the design of the acoustic treatment to deal with those issues? How will you provide and distribute the necessary amount of 309 sabins of absorption that you need for that room, to get the decay times within IEC/AEC specs? What coefficient of absorption would you prefer for that? Are you aware that your Schroeder frequency for that room will be 134 Hz, and what do you plan to do about that? Do you think that the Bonello curve for your room is acceptable? Do you think that the location with respect to the Bolt area is acceptable? Did you know that your 3.1.0 tangential mode and your 0.2.1 tangential mode coincide at the same frequency, which just happens to also be the Schroeder frequency? Is that something you should be worried about? Should you do something to treat that, or can you forget about it safely? What will the fundamental SBIR problem be at the mix position in that room, and how will you deal with it? Do you think that an overall RT-60 time of 200 ms would be good for that room? If not, would you go higher or lower? What would be optimal?

That's just a few of the issues that you should be considering, based only on the dimensions of your control room... If you can't answer all of those immediately, then you are not ready to build.

By all means, carry on with the outer leaf, get those walls done, plastered, sealed, etc. But don't do anything at all with the ceiling, doors or inner leaf yet. First, design it. Then when the design is absolutely complete, build it.

I'm sure that this is not what you wanted me to say, nor what what you want to hear, but it is the absolute best advice I can give you right now.


- Stuart -
casaestudio
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:21 am
Location: Galapagar, Madrid. Spain
Contact:

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by casaestudio »

Thanks sooo much for the advice, Stuart. That's actually what I was expecting (and somehow hoping) to hear from you.

We've been working on the outter walls only and stripping all the original drywall finish to get a chance to see and fix any problem we see.

We actually hoped we would NOT find the steel frame as we did and that has affected greatly on the options to make the ceiling higher.

Anyways, I'll try to post pictures, ideas and info on the control room design. The bricks you saw on the pics were just for reference (nothing being built on the inner leaves!) :horse:

We are forced to slow the pace in the next week and, since I'll be out for work with lot's of hotel time, I'll take my time to share my ideas as for the CR in depth. Anyways, we are mostly focused on the Live Room because that is the first we want to build.

Thank you thank you THANK YOU very much. Your counceling means so much for us and the way you help say a lot about you. Congratulations.
All in all is all we all are. (All apologies, Nirvana)
Silvestre
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 2:05 am
Location: Madrid (Spain)

Re: Casaestudio Project

Post by Silvestre »

Soundman2020 wrote:By all means, carry on with the outer leaf, get those walls done, plastered, sealed, etc. But don't do anything at all with the ceiling, doors or inner leaf yet. First, design it. Then when the design is absolutely complete, build it.

I'm sure that this is not what you wanted me to say, nor what what you want to hear, but it is the absolute best advice I can give you right now.


- Stuart -
Hi, again, Stuart,

I really appreciate all that "dogs" you have put names to. And also that (piece of) advice of going on with the outer leaf... because our holiday time is coming to and end and, when that will happen, we would be very slower working one by one instead of "as a team"

It would be great to be able to give the house a bit more use than it has now...

I have to learn about that SketchUp software and I have to finish my reading of the book of Everest and that couple of chapter on Gervais I was no so seduced to read about: HVCA and Room Acustics... :roll:

We are taking things slower than it might seems, mainly due to we are coming into our last 15 days of full day work... we have to slow down even more after that.

We wanted to update the information and expectations (maybe a bit of "decisions" about the design) because, to go on a little bit doing the outter leaf, we need to know whether we are leaving space for a door or not in the wall between the living room and the garage... we would save building time and materials if we could place the doors and visors between rooms

Our problem with the three-leaves system becomes a problem with the design to some extent, when it comes to prepare the outter leaf... outter leaf is also an inner leaf some place of the studio...

We wanted to have the garage isolated in this first stage of our building... we wouldn't have the same time available to build the inner leaf for the control room and maybe Nico would be working more than a pair of terms in the living-room with just its outter leaf (fiberglass at sight is a problem)... but if we had to stop before building a room within the garage we would like at least to close the gap you see here...

As part of the outter leaves preparation we need to take that heater out the garage; to close that old door gap; and to give the garage a new door (even though it has to be changed or improved later): we need to get that room more isolation that it has with that HUGE hole in the wall... and we still need to go inside... :D

... so... do you think we could get a door at the end of that corridor?... even though we still don't know how "to tame that dogs"

even if there would be no corridor at the end... Would it compromise too much any further design if we put a door at that place?

We could close the door's gap (we know that now)... but it would be work...

We promise not to jump out the edge of the cliff

PS.- Hi, Nico... didn't know you were there too
Post Reply