help with small basement studio
Moderators: Aaronw, kendale, John Sayers
-
jon s
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:24 am
- Location: Leeds, UK
help with small basement studio
hi,
i'm looking for some input on what to do with my proposed basement studio. i have checked a few similar designs, but my room has a couple of mass concrete 'benches' (lower than desk height) and i have no idea how this will change things..
i've included a sketch of the room, with my ideas to date, although nothing is fixed, any comments would be much appreciated.
thanks,
jon
i'm looking for some input on what to do with my proposed basement studio. i have checked a few similar designs, but my room has a couple of mass concrete 'benches' (lower than desk height) and i have no idea how this will change things..
i've included a sketch of the room, with my ideas to date, although nothing is fixed, any comments would be much appreciated.
thanks,
jon
-
John Sayers
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
jon s
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:24 am
- Location: Leeds, UK
yeah, unfortunately i need both doors. the one at the top is the main entrance, and the one at the bottom leads to a small ceiling level window which is required by building regulations as a fire exit. i can add treatment to the door, but not block it off entirely.
this arangement means that i don't have enough room to use symetrical corner traps, what's the best way round this?
this arangement means that i don't have enough room to use symetrical corner traps, what's the best way round this?
-
John Sayers
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
jon s
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:24 am
- Location: Leeds, UK
-
John Sayers
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
jon s
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:24 am
- Location: Leeds, UK
thanks for the pointers. i've had a good look through the example studios and tried to apply this to a smaller room.
how about this for a starting point? not really sure what to put on the ceiling, but that kind of space allocation works ok.
i've put high absorbtion behind the speakers as i can fix this to the door. should i place a different kind of panel centrally? it's all guesstimation from my end, although i like the shape i'm heading towards
cheers,
jon
how about this for a starting point? not really sure what to put on the ceiling, but that kind of space allocation works ok.
i've put high absorbtion behind the speakers as i can fix this to the door. should i place a different kind of panel centrally? it's all guesstimation from my end, although i like the shape i'm heading towards
cheers,
jon
-
John Sayers
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
jon s
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:24 am
- Location: Leeds, UK
ok, now for some detail...
i'm asuming that the most important treatment will be the side walls, which i'm aiming to be 'broadband low-mid frequency absorber's' as you show on the SAE site (thanks for the great info btw!)
from the formula i can see that varying slot width and box depth (achieved by angling the surface) affect the resonant frequency. do you think that varying these two factors will be enough (ie: i hope i don't have to vary slat width and slat depth too, i'm no DIY hero!) - what slot widths (and standard slat depth) would you suggest for my room??
i'll probably make two pannels either side to keep it structurally rigid, so i could mix up a fair number of slot widths (see dodgy diagram!)
the rest of the treatment pretty much defines itself due to practicality. what kind of absorber would you suggest for the ceiling (i'm thinking more slots at the moment, but maybe at different fequencies??)??
that leaves the floor - a) carpet, to soak up more highs or b) wood to keep it 'live'
thanks for all your help, i feel like i'm beginging to get a grasp of this, but to be honest i'm a bit worried i'll put in a lot of work and miss something important without checking the steps with someone who actually know's what they are doing!!
jon
i'm asuming that the most important treatment will be the side walls, which i'm aiming to be 'broadband low-mid frequency absorber's' as you show on the SAE site (thanks for the great info btw!)
from the formula i can see that varying slot width and box depth (achieved by angling the surface) affect the resonant frequency. do you think that varying these two factors will be enough (ie: i hope i don't have to vary slat width and slat depth too, i'm no DIY hero!) - what slot widths (and standard slat depth) would you suggest for my room??
i'll probably make two pannels either side to keep it structurally rigid, so i could mix up a fair number of slot widths (see dodgy diagram!)
the rest of the treatment pretty much defines itself due to practicality. what kind of absorber would you suggest for the ceiling (i'm thinking more slots at the moment, but maybe at different fequencies??)??
that leaves the floor - a) carpet, to soak up more highs or b) wood to keep it 'live'
thanks for all your help, i feel like i'm beginging to get a grasp of this, but to be honest i'm a bit worried i'll put in a lot of work and miss something important without checking the steps with someone who actually know's what they are doing!!
jon
-
John Sayers
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
The depth varies because of the angle the slots are at so there's one variable. The next easiest variable is the slot width. If you use the same width timber (slat width) you can still create a broadband just using the first two variables.
Try 6' x 1" slats with 1/16", 1/8", 1/4", 1/2" slot widths.
or - here's an example where the slat width is varied

cheers
john
Try 6' x 1" slats with 1/16", 1/8", 1/4", 1/2" slot widths.
or - here's an example where the slat width is varied

cheers
john
-
jon s
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:24 am
- Location: Leeds, UK
great, i think i can manage that. i'll have to limit the angle to 10 deg throughout to get things to fit, hope that doesn't drastically alter performance..., i assume that i evenly distribute the different slot widths to get even absorbtion.
i'm thinking of using the same kind of absorber slots in the ceiling as shown on my section, unless you think that would be overkill! would i set up the slats to run along the length of the room (might look a bit wierd) or across it?
just the floor to go. i have no idea here. most studios go for wooden floors, but then most of them are big enough not to have treatment over all the surfaces!
a) wood parquet on concrete for 'live' sound
b) carpet for more high damping??
c) wood + rug for a combination???
getting there
i'm thinking of using the same kind of absorber slots in the ceiling as shown on my section, unless you think that would be overkill! would i set up the slats to run along the length of the room (might look a bit wierd) or across it?
just the floor to go. i have no idea here. most studios go for wooden floors, but then most of them are big enough not to have treatment over all the surfaces!
a) wood parquet on concrete for 'live' sound
b) carpet for more high damping??
c) wood + rug for a combination???
getting there
-
John Sayers
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
John Sayers
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
jon s
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:24 am
- Location: Leeds, UK