Additionally I realized that figuring out the software was only a small fraction of the issue. As example I figured out how to create a floor and wall. Mind you I couldn't connect the two, but the form asked all sorts of construction questions of which I know little about and have to be done to code. I know some of that, but I'm not a construction guy not a structural engineer, so that's pretty much where I gave up. I have seen construction software in use (when they built my previous house) and they basically just drew lines and the software built the object based on the local building code that was entered for that area. One could adjust all the elements, but it created it from a known set of rules.Johnny Corvette wrote:I am not sure what it is about S-U but, it appears at first, as with a lot of software, to require a big commitment and learning curve. I would say roll through the video tutorial on the Google S-U site and take your time. Things click pretty fast once you get over the hump and it is really pretty easy to use for basic layouts. I am ready to give up forever on AutoCad.
I messed with it several times and gave up - the tutorials took a little time but it is worth it. I - possibly like others - tend to just jump in to new software and figure I can wing it without instructions. This sometimes works. I think with S-U you need to be taught first.
Good luck.
When I built my previous studio I made the mistake of putting the outlets 12" from the floor, they needed to be 16" from the floor. They were also required to be located every 6'. Now I have an older house, outlets are 12" from floor, and only one outlet per room in some cases.
I think if someone has the time to do all the extra research, or they are just using it for layout idea's, it's probably great. I wish I had that luxury. This makes programming my CNC machine look like a piece of cake. I at least got that to cut circles after a week... of course I haven't touched it since... anyone need a CNC machine?? LOL