Sheetrock between the studs a usable approach?

Started by RuneW on 7 November 2007. 8 replies.

Originally posted at johnlsayers.com, topic 9720.

First time here. Sorry about my ignorance. I'm building a HT as a room-in-room solution in a basement with existing "light concrete" (Leca blocks) walls. Because of this, I'm not able to use rock sheet on both sides of the studs. Is the attached solution usable or a waste of time/space/money. The same solution could be applied to both the ceiling and the walls. Has this been tried before? I apologize if this question has been raised before, but I don't know how to search for a thing like this... (On the picture below, the lower side is against the HT)
Image not preserved: Room-in-room.gif
Rune, I would not place the drywall directly against the concrete - but would rather bring it to the HT side of the wall - keep the framing at least one inch free of the masonry. The above approach is a good one for the floor above - but don't leave a space between the drywall and the decking - install it tightly against the existing. Rod
rod gervais wrote:
Rune, I would not place the drywall directly against the concrete - but would rather bring it to the HT side of the wall - keep the framing at least one inch free of the masonry. The above approach is a good one for the floor above - but don't leave a space between the drywall and the decking - install it tightly against the existing. Rod
Sorry about the unclear explanation, but the illustration shows the wall seen from above. The mention the ceiling was stupid, but I meant to ask if this method could also be applied to the ceiling. After I posted I realized that I can't do this in my ceiling because the floor beams (from the room above) and the ceiling beams will "interlace".
RuneW wrote:
Sorry about the unclear explanation, but the illustration shows the wall seen from above. The mention the ceiling was stupid, but I meant to ask if this method could also be applied to the ceiling. After I posted I realized that I can't do this in my ceiling because the floor beams (from the room above) and the ceiling beams will "interlace".
Rune. I knew exactly whatI was looking at - and still say that you do not want to place drywall adjacent to the concrete as illustraed - add it to the inside if you need more isolation. If you can't do it in your ceiling - then doing it in your wall probably wouldn't make sense - the ceiling / floor then becomes your weak point - and that is the value of isolation - your weakest points shall prevail. Add resilient channel to the bottom of the floor joist to isolate the drywall from the floor above. Sincerely, Rod
Ok. I guess it was your line "I would not place the drywall directly against the concrete" that made me think there was some misunderstanding, as I had planned for no such thing. The inner wall is to be a few inches away from the concrete wall (room in room). When you write "adjacent" I see it clearer. So, basically, a third layer of drywall on the HT-side would make much more sense?
Perhaps build your wall frames on the floor, fix gypsum to the outside face of the wall frames, then lift up into position. Do a search for "insideout". There may be moisture issues so close to concrete walls/floor in a basement though(?) Geoff.
SquarePants wrote:
Perhaps build your wall frames on the floor, fix gypsum to the outside face of the wall frames, then lift up into position. Do a search for "insideout". There may be moisture issues so close to concrete walls/floor in a basement though(?) Geoff.
Yeah, that could have been done, I guess. But after reading more about sound insulation, I'm not sure having drywall close to the concrete walls is a good idea at all...
RuneW - glad to see you made it over here from AVS :D. I would definitely listen to Rod...his advice is golden.
Audixium wrote:
RuneW - glad to see you made it over here from AVS :D. I would definitely listen to Rod...his advice is golden.
I second that Rune. He's on what your trying to achieve.