Can the arhitect work as the GC

Can you tell me if it is permissable to have the Architect also function as the GC. It seems like there might be a conflict of interest to me but I am told that this is done often. Would appreciate someone's input as soon as possible

yes, it is a viable approach. the only thing that changes is the usual checks and balances system that typically exists between the architect (as the owner's agent) and the GC. I would advise a fixed fee for design and construction so that the construction costs can be kept in control. jpmanis

In Australia it's common for the architect to also be the contractor which is what I assume you mean by GC. ?? It's mainly in house construction where most of the work is sub contracted anyway - electrician, plumber, roofing, concrete etc etc. I personally think it's maybe a good idea as no one knows the plan and design better than the architect. It also shows that the architect is building and construction literate, unlike some architects I've met ;) cheers john

I think that this is ethically, and contractually acceptable practice. Although, it can be alot of work for one person, depending on the project size. A single person operation ends with only the critisism of the client and architect. A believe that a multiperson arch/ca/gc company can have efficiency and aesthetic advantages over a seperate arch. and gc. The client's level of involvement is also an important factor. I believe that I prefer a fixed rate over a fixed fee, but the budget should not be ignored. I think fixed rate provides a full disclosure of materials and labor to the client. On all the fixed fee stuff around here, the builder will cut costs in areas that you don't see. All on which seem to fail the day after the warranty expires. Are you the owner/client or arch/gc?

Just make sure that they carry Errors and Ommissions Insurance, and lock him into the price of the project. This way, if the structure is unsafe, will not pass inspection, then it is not on you.

lowdbrent wrote:

Just make sure that they carry Errors and Ommissions Insurance, and lock him into the price of the project. This way, if the structure is unsafe, will not pass inspection, then it is not on you.

And don't forget to specify a completion date!

And a warranty!

There's nothing really wrong with it. Not many architects where I come from will do it, because they're too busy drawing things. But there are many construction companies with their own house-architect, and many architectural firms that have their own builders. Just make sure your contract protects you the same as it would with an independant builder.