Studio Glass

Started by Sinclair on 17 January 2022. 27 replies.

Originally posted at johnlsayers.com, topic 23059.

I'll be ordering studio glass between the control room and live room soon. Three windows, two panes each totaling six panes. I'm looking at two 1/4" panes with lamenate between. Each pane is then a robust 1/2" thick. Anything I need to be aware of before I spend $2g's on this? Are there cheaper options that might provide the same isolation? Thanks in advance.
I am not an expert but I would instinctively go for two different thicknesses in each pane sandwich.
DanDan wrote:
I am not an expert but I would instinctively go for two different thicknesses in each pane sandwich.
Interesting idea. Meaning both panes are still the same overall thickness?
Couple of shots of the windows I'm referring to.
Image not preserved: CR Window.jpg
Image not preserved: CRWindows1.jpg
Yes, same overall thickness or greater if you can afford it. It will probably be down to what is available. I think more trumps when you have a sandwich with a damping layer. But different thicknesses will have different weak spots, bending resonance. So no double bubble.
DanDan wrote:
Yes, same overall thickness or greater if you can afford it. It will probably be down to what is available. I think more trumps when you have a sandwich with a damping layer. But different thicknesses will have different weak spots, bending resonance. So no double bubble.
I'm looking at double 1/2" panes per window now. Not thick enough? Not sure if I can afford thicker...correction, I'm sure I can't afford thicker.
do you mean 2x 1/2" per pane (i.e. 2 1" panes), or 2 1/2" panes per window? if the latter is as much as your budget can handle, then go with that. you could later add a laminated layer when your budget allows.
gullfo wrote:
do you mean 2x 1/2" per pane (i.e. 2 1" panes), or 2 1/2" panes per window? if the latter is as much as your budget can handle, then go with that. you could later add a laminated layer when your budget allows.
Yes sorry I wasn't clear. Each pane will be two 1/4" glass with laminate between totaling 1/2" thick. Each window get two panes. Three windows...six half inch panes total. Didn't know I could add another laminated layer to an existing window later. Sounds like a pain. (pun intended) So if two 1/2" panes per window will give me the desired separation I'll go with that. Still wondering if there are any less expensive alternatives to glass?
since your windows will have glass installed after the frame is installed (so you can properly clean it etc before sealing it) you could removed the glass and add a pane. yes, it will be more difficult than doing it now (perhaps you can do 3x 1/4" on one of the panes) but its doable. the glass is good because its dense. matching the wall densities becomes much easier and lower cost than light window materials which ould require much thicker (re: $$$) to achieve. possibly less costly and more isolating - seal up the walls and use video camera and monitors to "simulate" the windows. a proper hardware controller will keep things real time and high resolution. in addition, you can have monitors on your tall gobos so your "windows" can extend around the live room...
gullfo wrote:
- seal up the walls and use video camera and monitors to "simulate" the windows. a proper hardware controller will keep things real time and high resolution. in addition, you can have monitors on your tall gobos so your "windows" can extend around the live room...
Thanks for the info Glen. Much appreciated. As far as sealing up the walls (control room windows) in favor of video cameras...maybe an option in the future. If the glass provides the isolation that I hope, it will tie the two rooms together visually and create a nice open feel to the studio as a whole. Something we were after from the initial design.
Take a look at this document from STC Viracon. It lists specs for laminated pane thickness and air gap size etc.
File not preserved: STC VIRACON.pdf
This document does not take into account the window frames however. Also, yes, two laminated panes of different thickness will help reduce the coincidence effect. Match or exceed the surface densities of your wall assemblies and don't forget to add desiccant in the cavities.
The coincident effect is not really an issue with thick (e.g. 12mm) laminated glass. In INSUL simulations 2 panes of the same thickness seems to always be better than different thicknesses, this is due to the damping layer between the individual glass panes. If you go for different thicknesses then you will have less mass than you could have done with two panes of the same thickness. More mass (damped) is better
Hi Paul. Could you clarify please? Surely two different thicknesses with a damping layer is better than two equal thicknesses with a damping layer when the overall thickness is greater?
Elusive Sounds wrote:
and don't forget to add desiccant in the cavities.
Thanks for that attachment ES. If I'm to add desiccant between the two panes how would you recommend I do that? Thanks
as a general note, assuming a decoupled wall set, you would also have the windows installed on each wall and also separated so as not to bridge the walls. the small air gap between window jambs can be sealed with caulk or simply masked with cloth. after one window is installed, add the desiccant unit(s) then install the other window. remember to clean the insides of each window before installing it :-)
gullfo wrote:
as a general note, assuming a decoupled wall set, you would also have the windows installed on each wall and also separated so as not to bridge the walls. the small air gap between window jambs can be sealed with caulk or simply masked with cloth. after one window is installed, add the desiccant unit(s) then install the other window. remember to clean the insides of each window before installing it :-)
Will do Glen. Thanks. Sealing the small air gap between window jams is a great idea. The inside glass will be at a slight angle towards the control room. Meaning at the bottom there's 5 inches of space between the two windows. 6 inches at the top. I am assured that due to the amount of insulation in all the walls and rubber under the flooring, the studio temperature will be very stable and condensation on the glass won't be an issue. I'm still sealing the gap.
DanDan wrote:
Hi Paul. Could you clarify please? Surely two different thicknesses with a damping layer is better than two equal thicknesses with a damping layer when the overall thickness is greater?
Some reading on the subject (mainly by Andre) : In particular, post 6 - https://gearspace.com/board/studio-buil ... -room.html And again, post 6 - https://gearspace.com/board/studio-buil ... -room.html Of course, it really comes down to how much isolation do you need, how much space can you afford between the panes, and how much are you willing to spend? 19mm glass is stupidly expensive compared to 15mm, just as 15mm is stupidly expensive compared to 8mm... providing that the thinnest pane meets the required isolation for the leaf in which it is installed (unless we're talking concrete blocks, in which case - good luck), there will be small gains by using a thicker pane for the second leaf, but at much greater cost and perhaps unnecessarily. The coincident dip is a non issue with such thick panes with the damping plastic layer. And an interesting selection of recent INSUL simulations so you can make up your own mind (sorry for the low resolution but this site will not let me upload high res images) - it all seems to be six of one and half a dozen of the other, yet some are much better value than others:
Image not preserved: 1.jpeg
Image not preserved: 2.jpeg
Image not preserved: 3.jpeg
Image not preserved: 4.jpeg
Image not preserved: 5.jpeg
Image not preserved: 6.jpeg
Image not preserved: 7.jpeg
I've drawn up a sketch to show a simple way of building a double window which doesn't require any extra trim, keeps moisture out by use of a neoprene gasket acting as a "cavity closer", and has a place to hide desiccant while still looking presentable. It's about the cheapest way I can think of building a decent window which remains fully decoupled. The thickness of the glass may vary depending on your needs. Anyway, I hope you find it useful and if anyone sees anything that can be improved then please let me know...
Image not preserved: Double Window Assembly.jpg
Good stuff Paul. Thanks.
Finished the frames for the glass today. They'll be stained tomorrow to match the exposed beams. Glass goes in this week.
Image not preserved: windows.jpg
gullfo wrote:
very nice!
Thanks Glen. I don't know the all the calculations or algorithms but the space is really starting to coming together.
Glass in next week. 1/4"-laminate-1/4". Half inch panes two per window. Six panes. Doors hung today.
Image not preserved: CR Window3.jpg
Studio glass goes in next week. In the mean time doors and flooring.
Image not preserved: Floor3.jpg
Image not preserved: Floor1.jpg