Because I want a big room...
Then why did you just make it 20% smaller?
:shock: :roll:
You still have not changed your speaker angles. You are still stuck at 30° toe-in, with 60° axis intercept. Until you change that, you aren't going to get a good layout for your room.
the analogue mixer will fits well
Not understanding you at all now! Before you had 177 cm from mix position to soffit center: now you only have 144cm! How is that better?
When I suggested that you should change your angles before, reducing that same distance to something like you have now, you said that would not work because it "lost the empty space to put a analogue mixer".
:shock: Very confusing: when other people give you advice you say it can't be done, then you come up with a plan yourself that does exactly that, and it is fine!!!
:roll:
the room proportions are much better!
Ummmm.... no. The room proportions have not changed. The room is still 4.7m long and 3.1m wide. And your head is now at the 50% point of the room.... Thus, this situation is far worse than it was before.
I moved the front wall forward like Gregwor said
No. You moved the front face
of the SOFFIT, not the front wall. The wall is still exactly where it was before.
Now I've a good RFZ,
No you don't. You still have serious reflections from the opposite side wings back to the mix position. I don't even need to ray-trace to see that.
Have you done ray-tracing, to check the ACTUAL reflection paths?
And that works with the standard 30º angle!
Why are you stuck on that angle, when it is not optimal for ANY room, especially a long and narrow one like yours?
Now the room has 240x310x400
No, because you did NOT move the wall! You just moved the soffit.
Even assuming that you DID move the wall, if you did that you would be reducing the floor area from the original 14.6m2, which is already very small (way smaller than the recommended 20m2 according to specifications), to the even tinier size of just 12.4m2. So you would reduce the size of the room by 16%, just so you can keep the angle of 30°, which you don't even need to keep anyway.... That reduces the room volume from 35m3 down to just 29m3... when it should be at least 47m3, according to specs. So you would be shrinking your room from about 75% of the recommended volume to about 60% of the recommended volume for a control room...
I really don't understand why you do not want to take our advice. But I'll try again:
1) FORGET THE 30° ANGLE! It is not needed, not optimal, and is causing you to make bad decisions trying to chase it.
2) FORGET ROOM RATIOS! There is no need to chase a ghost! The ratio of your UNTREATED room isn't fantastic, but also isn't terrifying: it is only just outside the Bolt area, and nothing to worry about. With decent speaker soffits in the front and deep treatment in the back, you'll be fine.
3) Maximize room volume! Don't do anything that would shrink our room more: it is already small. Work hard to keep it that way. Maximizing your room interior volume is far more important that chasing after room ratios or speaker angles, that are NOT important.
4) Before you do anything else, you first need to draw the actual size of the room
after the isolation is done. You have not show that yet. Right now, as far as I can tell, you are only showing the size of the outer leaf, then the treatment, but not the isolation plan. Isolation is going to take up a lot of space, and reduce the size of the final inner-leaf room. We don't yet know what the actual size of that final isolated room is going to be, and until we do, there's no point in setting out soffit walls, wings, speakers, and the mix position.
5) Do things in the right order: FIRST define your isolation, THEN once you have that in place, start working on the speaker locations, soffits, mix position, and LAST OF ALL the treatment. Designing the treatment is what you do at the end, once the basic geometry of the room is known. You can't really design the treatment much until you know where the mix position and speakers will be, and what the soffit angles will be. Those locations define where most of the treatment has to go...
- Stuart -