Anti-Vandal Mixing Room

Started by midiverb on 7 February 2013. 17 replies. In the Library under Walls, floors and ceilings.

Originally posted at johnlsayers.com, topic 18150.

Hi All, I am currently hoping to convert a building site anti-vandal shower unit into a mixing space & was hoping maybe somebody might be able to answer a few queries I have? Specs. It's a midsize open plan anti-vandal unit ( Insulated, with PVC coated steel 1.5mm both sides )
Image not preserved: walls.png
The unit is currently on blocks in my back garden & about 15ft from any other buildings. The internal dimensions are as follows 287cm Width 582cm Length 249cm Height.
size.png
size.png
Budget The unit solid so I'm looking to spend €1500 on the fitting out & acoustics. I'm looking to do the work myself. I also have 5 rockwool broad band bass traps that I built a few years ago. Objectives. I want the unit to function primally as a mixing room with levels about 85dB normally (98db max) I will very occasionally once/twice a year be recording live instruments (Drum overdubs etc ) Questions. 1.Given that space is relatively tight & the unit already has an odd steel-insulation-steel wall , what's the best to maintain/improve acoustics ( most important) while increasing isolation ( least important)? i.e should I build a room within a room or will adding a few layers of plasterboard directly be wiser. 2.Should I use the mixing room in this excellent design as a road map given the dimensions are roughly similar ? viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3119 3. I can add a small out house toilet later but if there was a acoustic benefit to reducing the size I could put a toilet in the corner closest to the door. ( I would then mirror this with a concealed kitchen on the other side to maintain symmetry ) I hope that makes sense & thanks for taking the time to read this. All the best Owen
Ok having pondered my predicament a little further I think that I'm going to build "inside-out" walls as described here. http://johnlsayers.com/Recmanual/Titles/Acoustics3.htm I believe this will greatly help with the acoustics while improving the STC with minimal space wasted. Keeping the above in mind , the design will be based on a modified control room of viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3119 I'm still not really sure how my "steel-insulation-steel" behave within this design. Questions. A. Given that my walls already have steel-insulation-steel, is the 40mm of insulation on john inside-out walls needed.? (see image) B. What's the minimum gap you can leave ? (see image) C. I have access to very cheap plywood ( long story), could I use plywood instead of drywall/plasterboard on the inside-out wall.
Image not preserved: inside_out_2.gif
D. I have modified john's design ( the couch end) by mirroring the rear of the control room. Will this work?
top.png
top.png
windows.png
windows.png
E. There are a two small windows & a large fuse board in the unit. Any suggestions to dealing with these? I would like some natural light but it's seems to be a massive amount of extra work while simultaneously negativity effecting the STC given their size (53cm x34cm)?
fuseboard.png
fuseboard.png
F. Any suggestions for the ceiling? Again thanks for your time.
Sorry also, would it be a bad idea to put vapor barrier just behind where John's drawing spec's "plain black cloth" ? I'm a little worried that the cloth alone will act as a sieve & create a lot of dust problems. Thanks
Hi Owen, and welcome to the forum! :) I guess the biggest question here is the "PVC coated steel 1.5mm both sides". The issue is : How does that function, acoustically? I'm not aware of any acoustic analysis of such structures (although there might well be something out there!), so I really can't say for sure. But it does seem to be that it is basically a coupled two-leaf system, similar in some aspects to an ordinary house wall, of 2x4's with thin drywall on both sides. Steel is about ten times denser than drywall, so in effect, with 2 leaves of 1.5mm steel, you have the same total amount of mass as two leaves of 15mm drywall. The big question mark here is how well the insulation between those decouples them, and what its resilience is. If that is rigid, dense, closed-cell insulation, then there won't be much of either "decoupling" or "resilience" going on, and it is basically acting as a single leaf. But if it is soft, low density, open-cell insulation, then it could be doing both quiet well, and it would be acting as a two-leaf system Since these are major unknowns, I would suggest that you treat it as though it were a coupled two-leaf system, and move forward from there assuming that you are building a 3-leaf system. That's the safest starting point, I think.
The unit is currently on blocks in my back garden
So it is not sitting on a slab? "On blocks" to me implies that the floor is raised off the ground, with an air gap below. In which case you have two problems: first is acoustic: you have a resonant floor tuned to an unknown frequency. And second is structural: You don't know how much weight that floor can handle safely, so you are going to need a structural engineer to come in tell you.
I want the unit to function primally as a mixing room with levels about 85dB normally (98db max) I will very occasionally once/twice a year be recording live instruments (Drum overdubs etc )
Good! So your isolation needs are not extreme. You should really put real numbers to that by measuring with a sound level meter, but let's assume that you can get by with about 40-something dB of isolation. That is do-able, but probably not on your budget. You should also use your meter to check how much isolation you are getting at present. I would expect at least 30 dB from the walls, probably better, but the weak points will be the door and windows.
i.e should I build a room within a room or will adding a few layers of plasterboard directly be wiser.
That's what I would do, yes. A simple 2x4 stud frame with a single layer of 16mm drywall should get you where you need to go. Just adding layers of drywall to the existing structure is not going to help much. I suspect that your wall would act more like it is governed by mass law than by MSM, so two layers of 16mm drywall directly on the surface of the existing wall would gain you maybe 5 or 6 dB of isolation, with luck. Building a separate leaf with just one layer of drywall could get you an increase of 10 to 15 dB.
The internal dimensions are as follows: 287cm Width, 582cm Length, 249cm Height.
Those are not so good. The ratio is not healthy at all. However, the isolation wall is going to take off 10cm or so on each side, so the internal measurements are going to end up around 2.39 (H), 2.67 (W), 5.62 (L). But the length is still too great: there are no good ratios in that region. Which leads to...
but if there was a acoustic benefit to reducing the size I could put a toilet in the corner closest to the door.
If you reduce the final inner-leaf to 3.45m long, then you get a very decent ratio of 1 : 1.11 : 1.44, which is close to Sepmeyer's best ratio. You could go a bit longer than that if you want. And doing this leaves you plenty of space for a bathroom and kitchen, .... or even a small isolation booth! :)
2.Should I use the mixing room in this excellent design as a road map given the dimensions are roughly similar ?
That's the basic idea, yes. You'll need to modify it to meet your needs, of course, but it an be your guide.
Ok having pondered my predicament a little further I think that I'm going to build "inside-out" walls as described here.
That's a good possibility. It simplifies treatment, and optimizes use of space.
while improving the STC
Don't rely on STC as a measure of studio isolation. STC is not meant for that, and is pretty lousy at telling you about studio isolation. STC does not consider the lowest two and a half octaves at all, so it tells you nothing about how well a wall isolates drums, bass guitar, keyboards, and other instruments with lots of energy in the lower frequencies.
A. Given that my walls already have steel-insulation-steel, is the 40mm of insulation on john inside-out walls needed.?
Absolutely, yes. The purpose of that insulation is to damp resonances in the cavity. Without that, your "drywall-and-cavity" will act somewhat like a tuned panel trap, but it will very likely NOT be tuned to the frequency where you need it most, and very likely will be tuned to a frequency that does not need it. So you could end not treating things that desperately need it, and instead absorbing useful frequencies that would have been just fine! The second purpose of the insulation is a a damper on the MSM system, which is what isolates you form the outside world. Failing to put isolation in the cavity can cost you as much as 10 to 15 dB of isolation.
B. What's the minimum gap you can leave ? (see image)
That depends on how much isolation you need (in decibels) and what the lowest frequency is that you need to isolate. But you should never go less than about 10cm air gap, regardless. Less than that and the MSM resonance starts to rise into the parts of the spectrum where you do NOT want it! :)
C. I have access to very cheap plywood ( long story), could I use plywood instead of drywall/plasterboard on the inside-out wall.
Yes, you sure can! As long as it is 16mm or thicker, that would be fine.
the design will be based on a modified control room of
One modification I would make is to forget the floating floor. That is not going to work for you.
D. I have modified john's design ( the couch end) by mirroring the rear of the control room. Will this work?
No. :)
E. There are a two small windows & a large fuse board in the unit.
The fuse box will have to be re-located into the final inner-leaf, while taking care to not compromise the isolation. You cannot simply cover it! It must end up where you have access to it. You will need to hire an electrician to do this for you.
I would like some natural light but it's seems to be a massive amount of extra work while simultaneously negativity effecting the STC given their size (53cm x34cm)?
You could still use them, if you want. Or at least the one closer to the center of that wall. Replace it with a single pane of thick glass, and put another pane in the inner leaf. You can probably use the vent as part of your HVAC system, but that needs to be planned carefully. What is your plan for HVAC? Mini-split plus ducts for fresh air would probably be the easiest and mot economical for you, so that "vent" could be part of that, either for the fresh air inlet duct, or more probably for the stale air exhaust duct. The other thing I would suggest, is soffit-mounting your speakers. Major benefits from that! - Stuart -
Hi Stuart, Many thanks for your time & detailed response. I've been looking at this message board on and off for years and I am still overwhelmed by the knowledge , time & patience shown. Hopefully I can adress some of your concerns below.
So it is not sitting on a slab? "On blocks" to me implies that the floor is raised off the ground, with an air gap below.
This is correct. The unit is sitting on blocks, I had considered laying a slab foundation before I moved the unit into place but was advised against it for some odd reason I can't quite articulate.
You don't know how much weight that floor can handle safely, so you are going to need a structural engineer to come in tell you.
Excellent point, I hadn't even thought about that. I had a quick look underneath and the floor seems to be supported by 6 large 1800mm wide steel beams welded directly to the frame. It looks very study but I have arranged for someone who knows to have a look.Thanks
You should also use your meter to check how much isolation you are getting at present. I would expect at least 30 dB from the walls, probably better, but the weak points will be the door and windows.
I'll try arrange for someone to help me with this asap.Thanks
The ratio is not healthy at all. However, the isolation wall is going to take off 10cm or so on each side, so the internal measurements are going to end up around 2.39 (H), 2.67 (W), 5.62 (L). But the length is still too great: there are no good ratios in that region
I was afraid of this :lol:
As long as it is 16mm or thicker, that would be fine.
Ok that's good news, would one sheet of 18mm be "acceptable" acoustics wise? I don't want to appear to be too greedy on the source that's kindly offered me "very cheap plywood" but if needed I can pay a little extra.
One modification I would make is to forget the floating floor. That is not going to work for you.
Ok sorry, Do you mean the floating floor spec'd in Johns Sketchup drawing or the floating floor on.... http://johnlsayers.com/Recmanual/Titles/Acoustics3.htm If you mean the latter , are you talking about something like this? ( sorry if i'm way off, I already suspect you are talking about Johns Sketchup drawing)
inside_out_wall_minus_floor.gif
inside_out_wall_minus_floor.gif
In relation to splitting the room , I tried to make a quick drawing of it but it just felt too small at 3.45mtrs. Are there other options open to me? could I make a massive bass trap at the rear wall both sides of the door, to deal with the less than ideal acoustics. maybe something like this?
Image not preserved: Screen shot 2013-02-19 at 19.25.08.png
Screen shot 2013-02-19 at 19.28.51.png
Screen shot 2013-02-19 at 19.28.51.png
You could still use them, if you want. Or at least the one closer to the center of that wall. Replace it with a single pane of thick glass, and put another pane in the inner leaf.
I really like that suggestion. Thanks
Screen shot 2013-02-19 at 19.35.54.png
Screen shot 2013-02-19 at 19.35.54.png
You can probably use the vent as part of your HVAC system, but that needs to be planned carefully. What is your plan for HVAC? Mini-split plus ducts for fresh air would probably be the easiest and mot economical for you, so that "vent" could be part of that, either for the fresh air inlet duct, or more probably for the stale air exhaust duct.
The weather in Ireland is mild, very rarely hot or cold , would I be totally crazy to use something like this for the air supply.
baffle2.jpg
baffle2.jpg
Is passive ventilation on it's own even an option ? Thanks for taking the time to read this far, I hope that makes sense. All the best Owen
I had considered laying a slab foundation before I moved the unit into place but was advised against it for some odd reason I can't quite articulate.
Rust, maybe? Perhaps someone felt that sitting a steel box on a concrete surface might cause it to ruse eventually? Just a guess. But it does present problems for you now, since the floor is going to be some type of resonant system that is rather hard to predict, since most of the variable are unknown.
It looks very study but I have arranged for someone who knows to have a look.Thanks
Explain to him what you plan to do: build interior walls of 2x4's with 18mm plywood, plus acoustic treatment, etc. He needs to understand how much dead load you'll be adding.
Ok that's good news, would one sheet of 18mm be "acceptable" acoustics wise?
Should be fine, assuming that you don't need very high levels of isolation. Have you considered potentially disturbing noise sources, such as wind, rain, hail, thunder, aircraft, vehicles, people, animals, etc?
Ok sorry, Do you mean the floating floor spec'd in Johns Sketchup drawing or the floating floor on....
Floating floors in general. This thread should help to grasp the issues: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8173
In relation to splitting the room , I tried to make a quick drawing of it but it just felt too small at 3.45mtrs. Are there other options open to me?
There probably are, but I'd suggest that you try out all the possibilities yourself, using some of the "room mode calculator" tools on the reference page. Personally, I think Bob Golds' is the best, although it can be a bit cryptic!
could I make a massive bass trap at the rear wall both sides of the door, to deal with the less than ideal acoustics.
Bass traps don't count, since they do not change the inner-leaf dimensions of the room. ratios are measured to the hard, massive boundary surfaces of the room, and do not take into account acoustic treatment. So the room is still the same size, as far as modes are concerned, regardless of how big you make the bass traps.
The weather in Ireland is mild, very rarely hot or cold , would I be totally crazy to use something like this for the air supply.
That's the type of silencer you need, yes. There are many examples on the forum of silencers that people have built. You do have to take into account a number of things when designing them. And you need one on each leaf penetration, for maximum isolation.
Is passive ventilation on it's own even an option ?
You will need fans of some type to keep the air moving, and the size, capacity and velocity of those fans need to be calculated. There are specifications that you need to meet, in terms of flow rate, volume, speed, etc., based on the room size, occupancy, and a few other things. If you don't have fans, then air will not flow. You'll be building two totally hermetic, absolutely air-tight shells around you, so unless you create the air paths and do something to make the air move, nothing is going to happen. At the very least you will need one duct to bring in fresh air, and one to exhaust stale air, each with its associated silencers and fans. Depending on the room occupancy, heat generated, ambient conditions inside and outside, you'll likely also need a simple mini-split air conditioner to control the humidity and temperature inside. With the double air-tight seals and the huge amount of isolation you'll have around you, things will get pretty warm, pretty fast. The more people you have in there, the faster the temperature and humidity will rise. That needs to be controlled. But doing the math will reveal to you what path you should take. - Stuart -
Rust, maybe? Perhaps someone felt that sitting a steel box on a concrete surface might cause it to ruse eventually?
Yep , I think it was something along those lines. The guy I purchased it from seemed to know more than I did, so I didn't question it, obviously he wasn't an acoustician :D
Explain to him what you plan to do: build interior walls of 2x4's with 18mm plywood, plus acoustic treatment, etc. He needs to understand how much dead load you'll be adding.
Thanks ,I've been keeping him up to speed with developments , which brings me to the floor conundrum. Having read as much as possible I think my only option seems to be increasing the floor mass to whatever I can get away with structurally ? Am I on the right path? ( also for practical reasons I'm going to stick the 50mm insulation to the existing walls, I believe I read this is ok?)
Image not preserved: inside_out_wall_floor.gif
I'd suggest that you try out all the possibilities yourself, using some of the "room mode calculator" tools on the reference page. Personally, I think Bob Golds' is the best, although it can be a bit cryptic!
Ok thanks I'm back to the drawing board on the rear layout at the moment but I'll try get something together over the next day or so.
You will need fans of some type to keep the air moving, and the size, capacity and velocity of those fans need to be calculated. There are specifications that you need to meet, in terms of flow rate, volume, speed, etc.
Thanks for that , makes a lot of sense. There is a rather large extractor fan that came with the unit I was going to just throw it out , but now I wonder if it could recycled? It doesn't look very quite :shock:
extractor_fan.jpg
extractor_fan.jpg
Any suggestions as for the ceiling?
Ceiling 1.gif
Ceiling 1.gif
Thanks for all your help.
Thanks ,I've been keeping him up to speed with developments , which brings me to the floor conundrum. Having read as much as possible I think my only option seems to be increasing the floor mass to whatever I can get away with structurally ? Am I on the right path?
Probably, but you might also want to consider sealing up that cavity under your floor somehow, so it is air-tight. Not quite sure how to do that in practice, but it would help. Just adding mass to your floor is not going to give you amazing isolation: you are subject to a principle of physics called "mass law" that basically says every time you double the mass of your floor, you get a miserable increase of 6 dB in isolation. And that's 6 dB in theory! More like 4 or 5 in real-life, since actual physical building materials do not behave like the "perfect" mass assumed by theory. So starting with whatever isolation you are getting from the floor now (call it 30 dB for arguments sake), if you double that (eg, by adding two layers of 16mm plywood), you'll get about 5 dB more, making 35 dB. Then to get another 5 dB more, you'd need to add an additional FOUR layers of 16mm plywood (total of six layers). Then to get to 45 dB, you'd need to add ANOTHER six layers (total of 12 layers now).... you see why mass law is not your friend....! :shock: That's why a nice thick concrete slab on grade is such a desirable floor.
also for practical reasons I'm going to stick the 50mm insulation to the existing walls, I believe I read this is ok?
For the walls, that's OK. More is better, but 50mm is reasonable.
There is a rather large extractor fan that came with the unit I was going to just throw it out , but now I wonder if it could recycled? It doesn't look very quite
Ummmmm .... :roll: somehow, that doesn't look like it would fit the bill. But plug it in and see how quiet it is... You never know ...
Any suggestions as for the ceiling?
New joists across the tops of the new walls, not touching the existing walls or ceiling. Minimum 10cm air gap above, with insulation. Same number of layers of drywall or plywood as for the walls. The drawing you show is for John's "Inside Out" ceiling design, which saves space. OR rather, makes more efficient use of space. A bit harder to build, but worth the effort. - Stuart -
you might also want to consider sealing up that cavity under your floor somehow, so it is air-tight.
Yea, I might be pushing my luck ( wallet ) with 12 layers of plywood on the floor. :lol: ... I'm not sure if this will work but, maybe I could place 4" block around the perimeter of the base and then seal with expanding foam? Just a thought.
inside_out_wall_foam.gif
inside_out_wall_foam.gif
New joists across the tops of the new walls, not touching the existing walls or ceiling. Minimum 10cm air gap above, with insulation. Same number of layers of drywall or plywood as for the walls.
Ok great thanks. Does the ceiling need to be at an angle, or just flat? I've been playing around with a few layout options & I guess I'm still pretty unsure. Option A ( see below) is with the CR reduced to the recommended ratio, This seems to be the best options for acoustics ( looks good to :D ) but I'm afraid the room will feel uncomfortably tight, especially if there was more than one person inside. Also while researching I came across a post from Ethan Winer somewhere that said
Generally, small rooms do better without angles because the angles just make the room even smaller. --Ethan
I might be reading this wrong but, Is just leaving the room rectangle ( with inside/out walls ) & " tuning" it later an sensible option? or maybe somewhere in between?
A.png
A.png
A2.png
A2.png
B.png
B.png
Image not preserved: C.png
D.png
D.png
E.png
E.png
Image not preserved: F.png
Thanks for reading.
I'm not sure if this will work but, maybe I could place 4" block around the perimeter of the base and then seal with expanding foam? Just a thought.
Not too sure on that: I'd get professional advice on how to do that. You don't want condensation forming under there!
Ok great thanks. Does the ceiling need to be at an angle, or just flat?
Yes! No! Either! Neither! :) You can angle it if you want, or not, as you prefer, and according to your design concept. If you are going for RFZ, then you will need to angle it. Or you could just angle the front part, and leave the rest flat. Lots of options.
I've been playing around with a few layout options & I guess I'm still pretty unsure. Option A ( see below) is with the CR reduced to the recommended ratio,
Why are you angling the rear wall in A1 and A2? It should be straight across, not angled. If you cut off the corners like that, you are cutting off the area where you need bass trapping.
Generally, small rooms do better without angles because the angles just make the room even smaller.
True, but once again it depends you your design concept: it is impossible to do a modern RFZ design without angling the front wall, and front-to-side transitions! And if you soffit mount your speakers, then you already are angling the walls. But you don't show soffit mounting in any of your drawings... ? ? - Stuart -
Not too sure on that: I'd get professional advice on how to do that. You don't want condensation forming under there!
Ok thanks, I'll have to start asking around about some professional solutions.
Or you could just angle the front part, and leave the rest flat. Lots of options.
Excellent, will start researching. thanks
Why are you angling the rear wall in A1 and A2?
I guess in my rather remedial approach to understand acoustics :D I was thinking was that corners are bad & the "inside-out walls" act as a broadband acoustic treatment so hence the funny angles. I think I'm going to work some more on trying to find an aceptable solution.
And if you soffit mount your speakers, then you already are angling the walls. But you don't show soffit mounting in any of your drawings.
Yea, your right. I'm still conflicted about the soffit mounting. Pros A. I have adams A7 (& sub 7 ) so I think that soffit mounting the A7's has been well documented. I remember correctly I believe you have A7's soffit mounted, are you happy with them? B. I believe this will improve my speakers performance & possibly make for a better room. C. They look great. Cons A. They look quite difficult to do correctly. B. As my current rooms acoustics are pretty bad I don't even know how the A7's are preforming, so I'd be soffit mounting speakers that I might want to change later? I want to love the A7's but as it is I can't tell , I've had them for 3yrs & I'm still doing 20 + trips to the car for reference etc :D Thanks for all your help, really appreciate it.
I guess in my rather remedial approach to understand acoustics :D I was thinking was that corners are bad & the "inside-out walls" act as a broadband acoustic treatment so hence the funny angles.
Don't worry! That's a very common misunderstanding! Corners really are "bad", in the sense that that's where the bass "builds up" (more technically: all room modes terminate in corners), but that also means that corners are the best possible place for bass treatment! If that's where the bass is, then that's the prime spot to treat it... IN fact, treating bass in the corners gives you a 9 dB boost in energy reduction over treating it in the middle of the room, (18dB if you measure SPL). The reason is simple: If you treat up against one wall, then you get a 3dB boost in energy absorption (6dB SPL reduction), since you get to treat it it "going there" and also "coming back" as it bounces off the wall. Put two walls next to each other, and you are getting "bounces" of both walls, hence a 6dB improvement in total energy absorption (12 dB reduction in SPL). Put three walls together (as in two walls plus the ceiling, and you get three surfaces "bouncing back", hence 9 dB energy reduction, 18 dB SPL reduction. OK it doesn't really work quite like that, but it's an easy way to think of it. That's pretty darn good! So save your corners for thick, deep bass trapping. Inside-out walls do help, of course, but you need much more than just that for damping very low frequencies.
Yea, your right. I'm still conflicted about the soffit mounting.
The benefits far outweigh the downside! Soffit mounting effectively takes the speaker outside the room boundary, so it cannot interact with the front wall at all. That means that ALL of the artifacts caused by spekers being close to walls, simply do not exist. Gone. Buh-bye. Chao. Not there. No SBIR, no reflections, phasing, comb-filtering, etc. They simply cannot happen at the front wall, because the speaker is not in the room, acoustically speaking. Plus you also get the added (major) benefit of correcting the power imbalance inherent to all small speakers: Since high frequency energy basically acts like a "beam" going out the front of the speaker in one direction only ("half space radiation"), but bass energy basically acts like an expanding sphere, going out in all directions ("fill space radiation"), there is obviously a difference in the power between lows and highs. The difference is 6 dB: You need twice as much power in the lows, since half of it is going backwards and only half going towards you, while ALL of the highs go towards you, none the other way. Manufacturers have to build in correction factors in all small speakers, to boost the bass power output by 6 dB. The frequency where that starts happening (crossing over from no high boost to 6dB bass boost) depends on one single factor: the size of the front panel ("front baffle") of the speaker cabinet. This is called the "baffle step response". If you put your speaker in a soffit, this problem ALSO went away, just like the others, since the soffit acts like an "infinite baffle". Ideally, it is big enough that the baffle step problem now falls below the lowest tone that the speaker can produce anyway, or worst case, at least a lot lower than it was. So now you no longer need the "baffle step correction" circuit that is built into the speaker, since you have correctly balanced the power between lows and highs. Now all the lows and all the highs are radiating properly into half-space. That's why you need to adjust the control on the back of your speaker. Depending on manufacturer, that might be called "room compensation", "bass roll-off", "low freq shelving", "bass tilt", or even "half-space". Just set it to -6dB.
A. I have adams A7 (& sub 7 ) so I think that soffit mounting the A7's has been well documented. I remember correctly I believe you have A7's soffit mounted, are you happy with them?
Yup, well documented! The A7's work very well in soffits. The hardest thing about it is cutting that strange angle to match the angled bevel, but any half-decent carpenter worth his salt should be able to do that.
B. I believe this will improve my speakers performance & possibly make for a better room.
Oh YEAH!!! :yahoo: :!: Benefits: Much tighter bass, improved clarity, no SBIR, no comb filtering, cancellation, or other phasing artifacts, no reflections from the front wall, etc... It also improves your stereo image and sound stage, and gives you a better controlled sweet-spot. What's not to like about it?
C. They look great.
Yup!
A. They look quite difficult to do correctly.
Not really. The basic concept is simple: a large pieces of wood with a hole on the middle, and the speaker poking through the hole, so that it is flush with the wood. That's about all there is to it. You just need to hold the wood and the speaker rigidly in place, and provide a ventilation path to keep the speaker cool. Not too hard to do! If you can build the rest of the room all by yourself, then you can build the soffits too.
B. As my current rooms acoustics are pretty bad
We'll be fixing that for you, with the acoustic design!
I don't even know how the A7's are preforming,
Soffit mounted in that room, properly treated, they should perform very well. There's a reason that A7's and A8's are fast becoming a a new standard in home studios.... :)
so I'd be soffit mounting speakers that I might want to change later?
Then build the soffits with that in mind, so you can easily replace just the speaker and bezel without needing to disassemble the entire thing. There's a design here on the forum by Barefoot for doing just that, and I have another one if you are interested. PM me.
I want to love the A7's but as it is I can't tell ,
You will love them, once you get them set up in a decent space. They tell the truth. But if you really want to get the full benefit and fall head-over-heals for them, then add a Sub-10...
I've had them for 3yrs & I'm still doing 20 + trips to the car for reference etc
:shock: We'll change that for you too! Your mixes are not translating right now because your room acoustics are way too screwed up. In reality, you are NOT hearing your A7's very much right now: you are hearing the room. You are hearing the gross coloration added to the A7's by the room response. If you build your room right, you actually take the room out of the picture entirely, and for the first time you will be able to hear JUST the A7s, without the room. That's the goal. You need to design and build your room so that it adds nothing more than a bit of low level, neutral ambiance, to give you a sense of space, but the main thing you hear, is just the pure, clean, clear, direct sound form the speakers. That's the end objective here: build the room so well that it isn't there any more, acoustically. - Stuart -
So save your corners for thick, deep bass trapping.
Ok that makes a lot of sense, very well explained.
The benefits far outweigh the downside! Soffit mounting effectively takes the speaker outside the room boundary, so it cannot interact with the front wall at all.
I'm totally sold on this now.thanks
Yup, well documented! The A7's work very well in soffits. The hardest thing about it is cutting that strange angle to match the angled bevel, but any half-decent carpenter worth his salt should be able to do that.
Ok well that actually sounds quite doable. I'm hiring a carpenter to help with the stud walls so I'll make have sure I have that listed.
Benefits: Much tighter bass, improved clarity, no SBIR, no comb filtering, cancellation, or other phasing artifacts, no reflections from the front wall, etc... It also improves your stereo image and sound stage, and gives you a better controlled sweet-spot. What's not to like about it?
Wow, I'm actually kind of excited about soffits now. :lol:
You will love them, once you get them set up in a decent space. They tell the truth. But if you really want to get the full benefit and fall head-over-heals for them, then add a Sub-10.
ok I have the sub 7 but can't use it in my current set up because of the room problems. Do you recommend that I upgrade to the sub 10 ?
Your mixes are not translating right now because your room acoustics are way too screwed up. In reality, you are NOT hearing your A7's very much right now: you are hearing the room.
This has taken me an embarrassing about of time to accept. :oops:
You need to design and build your room so that it adds nothing more than a bit of low level, neutral ambiance, to give you a sense of space, but the main thing you hear, is just the pure, clean, clear, direct sound form the speakers. That's the end objective here: build the room so well that it isn't there any more, acoustically.
That sounds like heaven, I'm still struggling with my room layout a little. It seems that if want it open plan I'm stuck with a suspect ratio working against this acoustic nirvana. Well at least I feel like I have the top half decided upon now. :)
Ok I've been paying around with the ratios using http://www.bobgolds.com/Mode/RoomModes.htm And unless I split the room by reducing the length to 3.45m , It appears I might be best leaving things as they are: 2.39 (H), 2.67 (W), 5.62 (L) after the inside out walls. This gives me a room ratio of 1 : 1.11 : 2.35, everything else I tried keep returning "A worst case scenario" ( Sorry If i've missed something, this could be user error :oops: ) Temporarily assuming that I have done this correctly. I'm now starting to think about working with the space I have. I could be starting work on this within the next two weeks, so what I'm wondering is: A. Should I build "Super chunk corner traps" in the corners while building the room next week, that would be my preferred approach for practical reasons. B. Should I leave the back of the room untreated, then as a second stage, measure the room acoustics once completed and try fix the room to the issues uncovered ( if I need to make the corner traps to handle a specific frequency etc )...
A.png
A.png
Image not preserved: B.png
C. As the studio is going to be one room, I would like to place my computer inside the right soffit & the fusebox inside the left ( both low with a door ). Is this possible/advised, or anything I should know about doing that? Thanks again for your time & patience.
Sorry If i've missed something,
Maybe these? : :)
Computed Information: Room Dimensions: Length=5.62 m, Width=2.67 m, Height=2.39 m Room Ratio: 1 : 1.11 : 2.35 R. Walker BBC 1996: - 1.1w / h < l / h < ((4.5w / h) - 4): Fail
and:
- "18) Dolby's optimum ratios for Film & Music Room" 1 : 1.493 : 2.313
That's fine, for a movie theater or music room. Notice which organization recommends that ratio... In fact, you are CLOSEST to that ratio, but still quite a bit off. Take a look at this chart, which shows all possible ratios from 1 : 1 : 1: up to 1 : 4 : 4. The Dolby ratio is the green dot. Your actual ratio is the red dot.
midiverb-ratio-01.jpg
midiverb-ratio-01.jpg
On the above plot, black areas are the best ratios, grey areas are good, white areas are bad. And also this:
midiverb-bonello-01.jpg
midiverb-bonello-01.jpg
That's your Bonello graph, which is a rough indicator of the smoothness of the modal distribution across the audio spectrum. For a good room, it should rise as a smooth exponential curve, with no dips or peaks. If you reduce the length to 3.45, then this is what your Bonello graph looks like:
midiverb-bonello-02.jpg
midiverb-bonello-02.jpg
And this is where you are on the ratio plot (blue dot).
midiverb-ratio-02.jpg
midiverb-ratio-02.jpg
And finally, your ratio is listed as "2) L. W. Sepmeyer: 1965" 1 : 1.14 : 1.39 " There is no number 1 on that list, so actually that's the best possible ratio there is. I'm not saying you can't leave the room long and still get reasonable results: if that's what you want, then you could do that, and you could treat it accordingly to make it as good as it can be, within the limitations. What I am saying that it can be quite a bit better, acoustically, with a shorter room. You'd also need less treatment... (less expense, less complicated...).
A. Should I build "Super chunk corner traps" in the corners while building the room
Absolutely, yes. You WILL need those, regardless of the room size. Just don't but the insulation in there yet: it is always a good idea to run REW on the empty room, with just the shell, so you can use that as a baseline for all future tests. So after the inner-leaf shell is complete, soffits and all, but with no treatment at all of any kind, then set up your measurement mic and run REW. Then put the insulation in, and run REW again.
B. Should I leave the back of the room untreated, then as a second stage, measure the room acoustics once completed and try fix the room to the issues uncovered
You'll need to do that for the SECOND round of treatment, but the first round goes without saying: you always need corner bass trapping, ceiling cloud, first reflection points, and rear wall. Measure before and after that to see what effect you got, then design the second round to handle the issues that are still there.
( if I need to make the corner traps to handle a specific frequency etc )...
Corner traps are practically always broad-band absorbers, not tuned to any specific frequency. It is actually pretty hard to tune low frequency traps accurately, and since room modes are very narrow band, high Q, you do need to tune a trap very precisely if you are targeting a single mode. Not easy.... Not recommended, except as the very last resort for a really stubborn mode that does not respond to all other treatment efforts first.
C. As the studio is going to be one room, I would like to place my computer inside the right soffit & the fusebox inside the left ( both low with a door ). Is this possible/advised, or anything I should know about doing that?
The fuse box should be fine, but I would suggest that a better spot is inside the left slot wall, with the cover disguised to look like one of the slats. Put that on a magnetic catch, so you can have easy access to it. But do make sure you are allowed to hide your electrical box like that: Code might not allow it. Code might specify the height, and also specify that it cannot be covered. Check with your electrician, and with your municipality / electrical inspector. I would not put the PC inside the soffit: there are heat and vibration issues to consider. And besides, you need the lower section of the soffit for acoustic treatment! Hangers go in there... Rather, just build in a rack mount as part of your desk, and put the PC in there. - Stuart -
Ok wow thanks for taking the time to explain that to me, very compelling argument. :D
you are CLOSEST to that ratio, but still quite a bit off.
Ha, yea I thought I might be pushing it. I'm really starting to wish I new this earlier, I vaguely remember seeing a 12ft wide unit that just needed at little more work. :roll:
If you reduce the length to 3.45, then this is what your Bonello graph looks like:
:shock: That looks like a BIG improvement.
There is no number 1 on that list, so actually that's the best possible ratio there is
Well I guess I can kind-of count myself lucky then, at least it seems I do have a option to get things sounding as good as possible given my situation .
I'm not saying you can't leave the room long and still get reasonable results: if that's what you want, then you could do that, and you could treat it accordingly to make it as good as it can be, within the limitations. What I am saying that it can be quite a bit better, acoustically, with a shorter room.
I really appreciate all the time you've taken to try talk sense into me, I feel kind of like the contentious patient who is trying to convince himself "smoking is harmless"...Anyway the good news is, I've seen the light, If I can free up the funds of the extra doors etc I'm going to split the room. :D . If I can't I'll do it in a 2nd phase Would this be a good place to start, the middle wall is 3.45 mtr from the front wall?
Image not preserved: A.png
The fuse box should be fine, but I would suggest that a better spot is inside the left slot wall, with the cover disguised to look like one of the slats. Put that on a magnetic catch, so you can have easy access to it.
Excellent idea. I'll double check with my electrician
just build in a rack mount as part of your desk, and put the PC in there.
Sound like a plan & Speaking of the desk I was thinking of building a custom rack for my outboard that looked more like a mixing desk for ergonomic reasons.
Image not preserved: rack.png
Should I take any special acoustic considerations into account? Thanks for all the help.
ok I have the sub 7 but can't use it in my current set up because of the room problems. Do you recommend that I upgrade to the sub 10 ?
I have the Sub-8, and it is barely adequate for filling in the low end: it lacks power, especially when used in larger rooms. It can only just keep up with the A7s. The Sub-10 is a much better bet, as it is not short on power. Especially for your room, which has a large volume, I'd recommend the Sub-10. - Stuart -
Ok thanks for all your help Stuart, I'm looking at the sub now. very nice :D