Superchunk Vs. Framed Gobo
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 3:03 pm
Hi everyone,
Treating my new room, have a bunch of semi-rigid, and it's about to get under way. Since I built my last traps 18months ago, I am seeing alot more prevelence of the Superchunk method, so I am trying to choose thee best method for treating my corners. My last room had four-inch thick semi-rigid in frames, across the 90degree corners, stacked floor to ceiling. This worked well, but I want to improve the performance, if possible.
What would be better for controlling the corners of my room:
Superchunk method measuring 40cm x 40cm x 56.5cm front face?
OR
Six-inch thick semi-rigid, 60cm wide, open front and back, gobo style?
The gobo style does make the traps more versatile, I could move the gobos when needed to other uses. Is the Superchunk method that much more effective that I'd be better off for-going the versatility of the gobo design?
My room is 3.45 metres long, 3.4 metres wide, 2.5metres high, with a 65cm deep wardrobe running along one of the long walls. Despite the squarish dimensions, it doesn't sound too bad. Floor is solid polished hardwood, walls and ceiling are fibro. This will be a mix room, and will see tracking of vocals and acoustic instruments/guitar amps. Basically a one room mix/overdub studio. Two (possibly three) corners are to be Superchunk'd (if that is the consensus of this post) all other surfaces/corners will be handled by movable gobos, six-inches thick, open front and back, floor to ceiling. There will be a 4inch cloud above my mix position.
Any help y'all can give would be great. If you need any more figures/diagrams, please let me know. I have proven to be fairly useless with Sketchup, so please don't ask for a 3d room model. It won't be pretty!
Thanks,
Heath.
Treating my new room, have a bunch of semi-rigid, and it's about to get under way. Since I built my last traps 18months ago, I am seeing alot more prevelence of the Superchunk method, so I am trying to choose thee best method for treating my corners. My last room had four-inch thick semi-rigid in frames, across the 90degree corners, stacked floor to ceiling. This worked well, but I want to improve the performance, if possible.
What would be better for controlling the corners of my room:
Superchunk method measuring 40cm x 40cm x 56.5cm front face?
OR
Six-inch thick semi-rigid, 60cm wide, open front and back, gobo style?
The gobo style does make the traps more versatile, I could move the gobos when needed to other uses. Is the Superchunk method that much more effective that I'd be better off for-going the versatility of the gobo design?
My room is 3.45 metres long, 3.4 metres wide, 2.5metres high, with a 65cm deep wardrobe running along one of the long walls. Despite the squarish dimensions, it doesn't sound too bad. Floor is solid polished hardwood, walls and ceiling are fibro. This will be a mix room, and will see tracking of vocals and acoustic instruments/guitar amps. Basically a one room mix/overdub studio. Two (possibly three) corners are to be Superchunk'd (if that is the consensus of this post) all other surfaces/corners will be handled by movable gobos, six-inches thick, open front and back, floor to ceiling. There will be a 4inch cloud above my mix position.
Any help y'all can give would be great. If you need any more figures/diagrams, please let me know. I have proven to be fairly useless with Sketchup, so please don't ask for a 3d room model. It won't be pretty!
Thanks,
Heath.