Poly diffusers design in a 50 sqm live room
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:23 pm
Hi,
First of all...I wrote another Thread several months ago and I learned a lot thanks to it. This community is awesome I must say!
We are going to build a DIY solution (due to budget constraints) for our recording studio.
We have a live room of 50 sqm and 4 meters height. So, basically, it's a quite good space for recording drums, but we had been facing issues with the sound of it. It sounds a bit dull, lifeless...
After reading a lot, and after several REW measurements, our conclusions are
- Almost the entire room is tuned to the same frequency due to the slotted concrete blocks in the walls (Helmholtz resonators). That, while making the room a bit dead, creates an unbalanced response. (visible in the REW data, a valley around 250 Hz).
- The ceiling is mostly absorptive in the HF spectrum, reducing the RT60 but without touching the low end.
- The walls are parallel and they introduce flutter echo and comb filtering (you can hear it actually when recording drums, in the OH).
In an ideal world, with money, we would definitely hire somebody to design the whole thing. That's not our case at the moment so we had been waiting several months figuring out what to do (also because we were busy with other stuff). The great Stuart gave me some tips in another thread back in July last year, but I had been reading more and more since then.
After the research process, we decided that we're going to design and install polydiffusers. Reasons:
- Easy to build
- Cheap
- They have a good diffusion coefficient, they will cover part of those concrete blocks, they will increase the RT60 of our room and they will absorb some bass resonances (placing absorptive material inside them).
I attach some measurements. All of them show differences in the RT60 or Waterfall results, but also some similarities:
- All of them have an unbalanced response. Valley in the low-mids, peak in the mids, etc.
Based on calculations, the Schroeder Freq of our room is 74 Hz. The wave region goes from 17 to 74 Hz and the Ray Region starts at 297 Hz. Room size: 980 x 528 x 400 cm. I attached also some REW files.
I know that our solution won't be as properly designed as one made by an acoustic engineer. Our goal is to improve what we have right now and upgrading the sound of the studio without spending several thousand. A step forward. So take that into account
Our plan is to build
- Big poly diffuser in the side wall (980 cm).
- Poly's in the corners (with low density mineral wool inside, to absorb bass).
- Big poly diffuser in the front wall (528 cm).
- Small polys in the ceiling (thanks Stuart!) placed by trial and error (doing measurements and endless tests).
What do you think about this design for the side wall?
Thanks!!
First of all...I wrote another Thread several months ago and I learned a lot thanks to it. This community is awesome I must say!
We are going to build a DIY solution (due to budget constraints) for our recording studio.
We have a live room of 50 sqm and 4 meters height. So, basically, it's a quite good space for recording drums, but we had been facing issues with the sound of it. It sounds a bit dull, lifeless...
After reading a lot, and after several REW measurements, our conclusions are
- Almost the entire room is tuned to the same frequency due to the slotted concrete blocks in the walls (Helmholtz resonators). That, while making the room a bit dead, creates an unbalanced response. (visible in the REW data, a valley around 250 Hz).
- The ceiling is mostly absorptive in the HF spectrum, reducing the RT60 but without touching the low end.
- The walls are parallel and they introduce flutter echo and comb filtering (you can hear it actually when recording drums, in the OH).
In an ideal world, with money, we would definitely hire somebody to design the whole thing. That's not our case at the moment so we had been waiting several months figuring out what to do (also because we were busy with other stuff). The great Stuart gave me some tips in another thread back in July last year, but I had been reading more and more since then.
After the research process, we decided that we're going to design and install polydiffusers. Reasons:
- Easy to build
- Cheap
- They have a good diffusion coefficient, they will cover part of those concrete blocks, they will increase the RT60 of our room and they will absorb some bass resonances (placing absorptive material inside them).
I attach some measurements. All of them show differences in the RT60 or Waterfall results, but also some similarities:
- All of them have an unbalanced response. Valley in the low-mids, peak in the mids, etc.
Based on calculations, the Schroeder Freq of our room is 74 Hz. The wave region goes from 17 to 74 Hz and the Ray Region starts at 297 Hz. Room size: 980 x 528 x 400 cm. I attached also some REW files.
I know that our solution won't be as properly designed as one made by an acoustic engineer. Our goal is to improve what we have right now and upgrading the sound of the studio without spending several thousand. A step forward. So take that into account


Our plan is to build
- Big poly diffuser in the side wall (980 cm).
- Poly's in the corners (with low density mineral wool inside, to absorb bass).
- Big poly diffuser in the front wall (528 cm).
- Small polys in the ceiling (thanks Stuart!) placed by trial and error (doing measurements and endless tests).

What do you think about this design for the side wall?
Thanks!!