Hi there. Adding to what Greg said:
Firstly, as Greg pointed out, STC is no use at all for measuring isolation of a studio. Here's why:
STC is no use at all for telling you how well your studio will be isolated. STC was never meant to measure such things. Here's an excerpt from the actual ASTM test procedure (E413) that explains the use of STC.
“These single-number ratings correlate in a general way with subjective impressions of sound transmission for speech, radio, television and similar sources of noise in offices and buildings. This classification method
is not appropriate for sound sources with spectra significantly different from those sources listed above. Such sources include machinery, industrial processes, bowling alleys, power transformers,
musical instruments, many music systems and transportation noises such as motor vehicles, aircraft and trains. For these sources, accurate assessment of sound transmission requires a detailed analysis in frequency bands.”
It's a common misconception that you can use STC ratings to decide if a particular wall, window, door, or building material will be of any use in a studio. As you can see above, in the statement from the people who designed the STC rating system and the method for calculating it, STC is simply not applicable.
Here's how it works:
To determine the STC rating for a wall, door, window, or whatever, you start by measuring the actual transmission loss at 16 specific frequencies between 125 Hz and 4kHz. You do not measure anything above or below that range, and you do not measure anything in between those 16 points. Just those 16, and nothing else. Then you plot those 16 points on a graph, and do some fudging and nudging with the numbers and the curve, until it fits in below one of the standard STC curves. Then you read off the number of that specific curve, and that number is your STC rating. That's it. There is no relationship to real-world decibels: it is just the index number of the reference curve that is closest to your curve. To clarify: the STC number is NOT how much isolation you will get: it is just the number that somebody once assigned to a curve on a graph. So for the STC-70 curve, they could have called it "STC-GGFQRT" or "STC-Delta-RED" or anything else, and it would tell you just as much about isolation as "STC-70" does: ie, nothing. It's a REFERENCE number, not an actual isolation number.
When you measure the isolation of a studio wall, you want to be sure that it is isolating ALL frequencies, across the entire spectrum from 20 Hz up to 20,000 Hz, not just 16 specific points that somebody chose 50 years ago, because he thought they were a good representation of human speech. STC does not take into account the bottom two and a half octaves of the musical spectrum (nothing below 125Hz), nor does it take into account the top two and a quarter octaves (nothing above 4k). Of the ten octaves that our hearing range covers, STC ignores five of them (or nearly five). So STC tells you nothing useful about how well a wall, door or window will work in a studio. The ONLY way to determine that, is by look at the Transmission Loss curve for it, or by estimating with a sound level meter set to "C" weighting (or even "Z"), and slow response, then measuring the levels on each side. That will give you a true indication of the number of decibels that the wall/door/window is blocking, across the full audible range.
Consider this: It is quite possible to have a door rated at STC-30 that does not provide even 20 decibels of actual isolation, and I can build you a wall rated at STC-20 that provides much better than 30 dB of isolation. There simply is no relationship between STC rating and the ability of a barrier to stop full-spectrum sound, such as music. STC was never designed for that, and cannot be used for that.
Then there's the issue of installation. You can buy a door that really does provide 40 dB of isolation, but unless you install it correctly, it will not provide that level! If you install it in a wall that provides only 20 dB, then the total isolation of that "wall+door" combination is 20 dB: isolation is only as good as the worst part. Even if you put a door rated at 90 dB in that wall, it would STILL only give you 20 dB. The total is only as good as the weakest part of the system.
So forget STC as a useful indicator, and just use the actual TL graphs to judge if a wall, door, window, floor, roof, or whatever will meet your needs.
---
So, assuming you meant "70 dB of isolation", and not "STC-70", that leads to the next question: Why do you think you need 70 dB of isolation? How did you determine that?
As Greg mentioned, getting 70 dB of isolation is a tall order: That's about the physical limit that can be achieved in a home studio build, and requires a very large investment, as well as very careful design, very careful planning, and very careful construction. Slight mistakes in construction can cost you large reductions in isolation. Most home studio builders aim for 40 to 50 dB of isolation, and perhaps 60 dB if they have a really good budget and spend a lot of time on the planning. 70 for a home studio is a very unusual thing. That's approaching the flanking limit for a good concrete slab-on-grade foundation and floor. It is possible to get GREATER than 70, yes, but then you need more advanced techniques (such as floating the entire room on tuned isolation springs) and very high mass materials (and very deep pockets!). That's out of range for most home studio builders, and even for most professional studios.
so I can play with out disturbing my family , and keep noise out of the recordings. even record drums in ISO2
Fair enough. Those are good goals. But have you checked that achieving "STC-70" will meet those goals, and do you have the budget to attain that?
With the space I have , using double wall construction this is a floor plan I think that might work for me , trading some space for hopefully a couple of rooms that will have and STC of 70+
"Thinking" and "hoping" ar not good ways of designing a studio!
Rather, you should plan the studio to
actually achieve what you "
hope" it will achieve, by doing the math and the design. Yes, for high isolation you absolutely will need proper "double wall construction", but that's only the most basic start. Each entire room will need "double-wall", on all sides, INCLUDING the ceiling. A room is not four walls: a room is six sides, which includes four walls and the ceiling and the floor. In your case, the floor is a given, but that still leaves you with the other five: four walls and the ceiling. Each room must be built as a single independent unit that consists of exactly that: four walls and a ceiling, where the ceiling rests on the walls, and none of that touches any part of the existing building.
Looking at clips and channel on the ceiling
That's not going to give you enough isolation to meet your needs. Even though clips are resilient, and do increase isolation, they still provide a partial path for sound and vibration to travel between the sheathing and the framing. Technically, the resilience of the rubber in the clips is in PARALLEL with the resilience of the air, so the rubber dominates and places a limit on how much isolation you can get. It won't be any where near what you need. Clips can get you an additional 15 dB or so beyond what you would have got without them, and for most situations that means a maximum of about 45 dB, or MAYBE approaching 50 dB if you had a really good situation to start with. Far short of what you need. Your only option for high isolation is to have your rooms full isolated. No mechanical connections at all, not even resilient ones.
also adding some mass ( 2*5/8 with GG and rock wool) to the floor above between the joist and using screws to tighten up the hardwood and sub floor layers,
As Greg pointed out, that's not the correct way to do it, because it forces the drywall and subfloor above to act as one single unit, without allowing each part to also act separately, thus reducing your isolation. This is the same as gluing sheets of drywall together: a big mistake. Instead, you should be placing your strips of drywall up against the sub-floor above, holding it in place with cleats nailed sideways into the joists, and sealing around the edges with caulk. Use GG if you want to, and if you have the budget to do that: it does help. But do NOT nail or screw the drywall directly into the subfloor above.
Also, before you do any of that, you need to hire a structural engineer to examine your floor and give you the OK to do that: he can tell you how much extra mass you can safely add to that floor. Do NOT ever add mass to any structural part of your building without first checking with a structural engineer!!! Very important. If you overload your floor and it collapses, your home-owner's insurance policy will NOT cover that, and you will be personally liable for all damages as well as medical expenses of anyone injured in the collapse. You will also be criminally liable for those injuries, or for death if anyone dies.
will add some MLV
There are no magical materials that you can use to cast a spell on your studio and make it isolate better!
Yes, MLV is good stuff, and yes it does have uses in studios. But it is just mass, and it s very EXPENSIVE mass. Sound waves can't read, so they are not impressed by the price tag on your mass. They won't stop any better because the price tag said "US$ 50 per kilogram" rather than "US$ 20 per kilogram". All they care about is the total number of kilograms, not how much each one cost. So go with the least expensive mass that will do the job. For most cases, and in most places around the world, that is plain old drywall. It has decently high density at reasonably low cost per kilogram. Other useful materials are OSB and MDF, and perhaps plywood, to a certain extent. Concrete and brick are also good possibilities.
padded engineered flooring at some future point on the floor above .
I guess you mean laminate flooring? That's fine.
Double wall construction with 2x 5/8 on the interior walls with GG
The concept is correct, but I doubt you'll get STC-70, and certainly not 70 dB of isolation, with such low mass.
sound batting ( safe n sound rock wool )
Why did you choose that? What are the coefficients of absorption or the gas flow resistivity for the specific brand and product that you chose? Does that provide the correct acoustic damping on the MSM resonance that will occur inside the wall cavity? How thick will that insulation be? What is the total depth of the wall cavity, and what percentage of the cavity will be filled with insulation? You need high isolation, so all of the above factors are critical, and must be determined carefully, not by guessing.
1 layer of 5/8 on the exterior wall.
I must be misunderstanding something here: I thought those walls already exist, and are unfinished stud-framed walls with sheathing on the outside and nothing else? If that's the case, then why do you want to create a three-leaf system by putting drywall on those unfinished studs? And if my assumption is wrong, and those are already finished walls, that already have drywall on the studs, then you should be taking that existing drywall OFF, not PUTTING MORE on!
You need to clarify what you have there currently. How are those existing walls built? Post some photos.
Still trying to debate the thought of adding a split mini for the AC rather than mufflers on my existing HVAC which I had sized for the whole house
You could go either way, and in BOTH cases you will still need to install ducts ans silencer boxes. If you install a mini-split, you will need ducts and silencers to supply fresh air, remove stale air, and circulate the conditioned air between the rooms. And if you go with the existing HVAC system, you will need ducts to connect your rooms to that system, for both supply and return. In both cases you will need silencer boxes, and they will need to be very large, because you need very high isolation. Personally, if that were my studio, I would probably go with an independent ducted mini-split system dedicated only to the studio, for greater separation and isolation from the rest of the house.
the garage thats being ocnverted.
So this is a garage conversion? It would have been better to clarify that right right from the start. Garage conversions involve factors that basement conversions and house conversions do not.
There's probably enough space in the adjacent hall way to build and to penetrate studio walls with mufflered returns and registers
I VERY MUCH doubt that! I don't think you realize just how big these silencers will need to be! Because you need very high isolation, you will require one silencer on EACH penetration of EACH leaf for EACH duct. You need a supply duct and a return duct for each room. You have two rooms. Each room has two leaves. Do the math: you need eight silencer boxes. They are BIG. If you design the HVAC carefully and split the the flow between the rooms, then combine it again afterwards, you could do it with just six silencers, but they still need to be big. HVAC design for studios is a big deal: When I design a studio for a customer, I often spend as much time designing the HVAC system as I do designing the entire rest of the studio, in all aspects! It's a slow process, there's lots of math involved, and you can't afford to make any mistakes, especially when you need high isolation. Think of it this way: in order to get high isolation, you need two massively dense leaves around each room, each of which is carefully sealed fully airtight, totally hermetic. But for HVAC; you need to chop huge gaping holes in those walls to put the ducts through!!!
That totally trashes your isolation, down to nothing. The purpose of the silencer box is to replace the missing isolation: the silencer is carefully designed to stop the sound from getting through, while allowing the air to get through. It's not easy to do that. The silencer is a tuned system, that uses several different characteristics and acoustic effects to stop the sound getting through, including mass, MSM, impedance mismatch, flow velocity changes, insulation, and multiple 90° bends. It's not simple. We are not talking about the typical flimsy metal cylindrical silencers that are commonly used in commercial HVAC ducting. Studio silencers are very different, they are BIG, and you don't seem to be allowing any space for them.
There's a lot more that you'll need to take into account here, and Greg already covered many of those so I won't repeat that.
In summary, you have the right basic concept here, but the details are going to need a lot of attention.
- Stuart -