Ideas on how to use an "additional volume" for absorbers
Posted: Thu May 24, 2018 11:41 pm
Hi guys,
maybe someone wants to help me finding the right idea to use some volume under a staircase that was found during the build of a studio. I don't know the exact size. At the moment I also can just guess from the pic that it is aroun 1m deep (from the studio...the right wall on the pic) and something between 1-2m3 volume.
Between this volume and the studio is a 25-30cm thick wall. My first idea was to just use the volume as a big helmholtz absorber and tune it to room mode(s) when the rest of the room is done. But with the volume being that deep it seems not to be possible to tune the resonance frequency to something high enough (40-80Hz).
It's a load-bearing wall so it's not easily removable. But holes could be made.
The problem that I see with anything absorbing to much >100HZ is that it looks like it is a first reflection spot so it could be a problem for the symmetry of the room.
The literature I know of writes for Helmholtzabs. the bigger the better. But regarding to the formulas I use this is just too deep?! The spring gets too weak => ResonanceFq. gets too low. I would need a hole with ~2m diameter (so basically a lamda/4th reflector?!)
With http://www.mh-audio.nl/acalculators.asp#showcalc I can design some slat resonators that could work but maybe that's outside of the calculators 'meaningful range'?! I prefer to check my calculations against scientific sources :/
Besides any science and calculations. Do you have an idea? How would you use it?
As a general info about the room a diagram of the first RT60 measurements (nothing done yet) Andy
maybe someone wants to help me finding the right idea to use some volume under a staircase that was found during the build of a studio. I don't know the exact size. At the moment I also can just guess from the pic that it is aroun 1m deep (from the studio...the right wall on the pic) and something between 1-2m3 volume.
Between this volume and the studio is a 25-30cm thick wall. My first idea was to just use the volume as a big helmholtz absorber and tune it to room mode(s) when the rest of the room is done. But with the volume being that deep it seems not to be possible to tune the resonance frequency to something high enough (40-80Hz).
It's a load-bearing wall so it's not easily removable. But holes could be made.
The problem that I see with anything absorbing to much >100HZ is that it looks like it is a first reflection spot so it could be a problem for the symmetry of the room.
The literature I know of writes for Helmholtzabs. the bigger the better. But regarding to the formulas I use this is just too deep?! The spring gets too weak => ResonanceFq. gets too low. I would need a hole with ~2m diameter (so basically a lamda/4th reflector?!)
With http://www.mh-audio.nl/acalculators.asp#showcalc I can design some slat resonators that could work but maybe that's outside of the calculators 'meaningful range'?! I prefer to check my calculations against scientific sources :/
Besides any science and calculations. Do you have an idea? How would you use it?
As a general info about the room a diagram of the first RT60 measurements (nothing done yet) Andy