5.Just use the concrete slab as your floor. why is that better than a more absorbant material ?
Concrete is about the best possible floor you can have in a studio: It is hard, rigid, solid, massive, acoustically reflective, etc. Just what you need.
There are several reasons for that, both acoustic and practical. The biggest acoustic reason is that your ears and brain are accustomed to hearing reflections form the floor, and use that as a sort of spatial reference. Wherever you go, throughout your entire adult life, your head is always the same distance form the floor as you walk around, so your brain understands that reflection really well. The distance from your head to the walls and ceiling changes constantly, so your brain isn't as interested in that, but the floor is always there, so enhancing that reflection helps your brain get a sense of the room. The same applies when you are seated: even though chair heights might vary a bit, you'll find that when you are seated your ears are pretty much always about 1.2m above the floor... which is why standard speaker height in studios is 1.2m above the floor!
If you put carpet on the floor, you rob your brain of that reference reflection.
Also, in terms of room acoustics, carpet does the exact opposite of what you need in a small room. Small rooms need a lot of bass trapping (the smaller the room is, the more it needs); they also need some controlled absorption in the mid range on a descending curve (more at low mids, less at high mids), and little to no absorption in the high end. Carpet, however, does the exact opposite: It sucks out all of the high end wonderfully, absorbs some of the mid range randomly on an
ascending curve, and does nothing at all to the low end. So not only is it useless, it actually makes things worse. Carpet will make your room sound dull, boomy, muddy, and dry. If you are tracking drums, for example, it will suck out your crash and ride, wreak havoc on the hi-hat and some of the snare, trash the toms, and make the kick sound like a wet cardboard box inside a concrete pipe....
Control rooms need to have neutral acoustics. Take a look at ITU BS.1116-3 to get an idea of how tight a control room needs to be kept, acoustically. It is flat impossible to achieve that with carpet.
There are practical reasons too (concrete wears better, is easier to clean, does not harbor dust, pollen, spores, etc). But the biggie for me, is the acoustic and psyco-acoustic reasoning.
Take a look at photos of high-end studios from all over the world: How many of them have fully carpeted floors?

Pretty close to zero...
I do having planning permission to put an opening rooflight in the ceiling , maybe I should reinstate ? I was worried that might prevent accoustic ceiling treatment and interfere. would it be better to put in a small window on the side for ventilation ?
I guess I did not explain this clearly enough: You cannot use operable windows, skylights, doors, vents or anything similar to ventilate a studio, for a simple reason: airtight. Your studio must be airtight if you plan to have good isolation. Because if air can get in or out anywhere, then so can sound (after all, sound is basically just vibrating air..). Unless you specifically and intentionally build something that blocks the sound while allowing air to pass. That "something" is called a silencer box. Here are several examples:
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... 0&start=45
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... 9&start=74
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... 25&start=2
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... 42&start=5
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... 61&start=0
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... 5&start=98
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... &start=157
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... =2&t=13821
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... 8&start=44
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewt ... 2&start=16
The bifold doors on the right will have accoustic glass
Same issue: If it is bi-fold, it will be very hard to get proper air-tight seals on it. It needs to be sealed completely, around the entire perimeter, such that air cannot get through at all. That's already hard to do on a simple hinged door, even harder on a sliding door, but much, much harder on a bi-fold door.
Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "acoustic glass". Many people and even some unscrupulous companies try to sell ordinary double-glazed units (sometimes called "thermo-panel glass") as "acoustic glass". Those are single units that have two panes of thin glass separated by a thin air gap inside (a few mm). They are NOT acoustic barriers. They only attenuate sound in the mid range and high end, but do very little to block low frequencies, such as drums, bass, keyboards, electric guitars, etc. True acoustic glass is a single thick laminated glass panel, solid all the way through, that is built up from two panes of thick glass with an acoustic PVB inter-layer sandwiched between them. A typical studio window is made from two such laminated glass panels: one goes in the outer leaf wall, the other goes in the inner-leaf wall, and there is a large air gap between them (several inches).
They will be double glazed with and extra layer of accoustic glass
See above..... also, if you have three sheets of glass in there (two in the double-glazed unit, plus an additional pane), then that's even worse! That is now a three-leaf system, which potentially gives even worse isolation than a single-leaf system or a two leaf system, all other factors being equal.
or do you mean there is too much glass in the 1st place.
You can have as much glass as you want, as long as you do it right. Proper laminated acoustic glass is rather expensive, so big windows are expensive. As long as you don't mind spending lots of money on it, there's no problem with having lots of glass, from the point of view of isolation. However, there might be other acoustic reasons why you would not want to do that: If you have glass at a point in the room where there are reflections from your speakers, you'd have to put thick acoustic absorption on that point to make the room usable, and it seems silly to spend a lot of money on glass, then cover it up...
10.You need an actual HVAC plan. I will investigate but any advice welcome as I am not sure how this works
It's fairly simple: you need one duct to bring fresh air into your room and that duct needs to have a silencer on it (see above), as well as one duct to take out the stale air (also with a silencer on it), plus a fan to move the air. The fan can go either on the inlet duct, to "push" air into the room, or it can go on the outlet duct "sucking" air out of the room. You only need one fan: Since the room is sealed air-tight, sucking air out of one duct automatically sucks air in through the other one. The fan and the ducts need to be sized correctly for your room, such that they move the correct volume of air at the correct speed. Normally you want the flow speed to be considerably lower than 300 FPS, and the flow rate to be enough that you replace the entire volume of air in the room at least 6 times per hour (once every ten minutes). In addition to that, you'll need a small mini-split system, that does the actual cooling and dehumidifying.
Look around the forum: There's many examples of rooms similar to yours, built by forum members, and you can see how they dealt with these issues.
- Stuart -