Taming SBIR: Rockwool vs. Fiberglass batts, strange result??
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:19 am
Hello, I've gotten enormous amounts of helpful info from this forum over the years, but this is my first post!
I have a very small (503cm long x 277cm wide x 251cm tall) surround mixing room. Due to the built-in counter and cabinets in one corner of the room, I am unable to move the speakers any closer to the front wall. However, I had previously made a large "wall" of 610mm thick 72 kg/m^3 Rockwool (with a 610mm gap behind to accommodate the upper cabinets), which has somewhat tamed my SBIR null at 118Hz (see first attached layout with green insulation). The null is ~10dB deep, which I'm told is not horrible, but I would love to knock a few dB off of that if possible.
To attempt to do so, I played around with different materials and thicknesses using the absorber calculator at acousticmodelling.com and realized that I could get a significantly improved response in my trouble area by using Owens Corning R30 batts instead of the Rockwool (see attached graph).
I removed all of the Rockwool, and filled every cm^3 I could with the fluffy R30 batts (see second layout with pink insulation). I was surprised to find that my null went from ~10dB deep to ~16dB deep! From everything that I have read, a large mass of insulation with a low Gas Flow Resistivity (OC R30: approx. 5,500Pa.s/m^2) should be better than a thinner panel of insulation with a much higher GFR (Rockwool: approx. 33,000Pa.s/m^2).
Questions:
• What did I do wrong??? I assumed that the worst case would be that it would not yield a significant improvement, but I never expected it to actually make the null worse!
• More specifically: Am I misinterpreting the placement of a thick mass of low GFR insulation vs. an equal (or even thinner) panel of low GFR insulation? In other words, does a thick mass of low GFR insulation only work as a corner bass trap, but somehow not as a first reflection point?
• I'm pretty stumped, so any other thoughts or insights?
Few notes:
• I later tried adding a thick MDF wall between the speakers and the R30 (to make an artificial front wall), but that made the null even worse (also unexpected) and changed the frequency slightly (not unexpected).
• The closest room mode is ~102Hz, but that does not seem to be an issue -- the null moves as expected in relation to the speaker's distance from the front wall, where 102Hz has never caused a peak or a null at my mixing position.
• I do have graphs, but I'm not at my studio computer. I will add those ASAP.
Thanks so much in advance for any help!!!
Brett
I have a very small (503cm long x 277cm wide x 251cm tall) surround mixing room. Due to the built-in counter and cabinets in one corner of the room, I am unable to move the speakers any closer to the front wall. However, I had previously made a large "wall" of 610mm thick 72 kg/m^3 Rockwool (with a 610mm gap behind to accommodate the upper cabinets), which has somewhat tamed my SBIR null at 118Hz (see first attached layout with green insulation). The null is ~10dB deep, which I'm told is not horrible, but I would love to knock a few dB off of that if possible.
To attempt to do so, I played around with different materials and thicknesses using the absorber calculator at acousticmodelling.com and realized that I could get a significantly improved response in my trouble area by using Owens Corning R30 batts instead of the Rockwool (see attached graph).
I removed all of the Rockwool, and filled every cm^3 I could with the fluffy R30 batts (see second layout with pink insulation). I was surprised to find that my null went from ~10dB deep to ~16dB deep! From everything that I have read, a large mass of insulation with a low Gas Flow Resistivity (OC R30: approx. 5,500Pa.s/m^2) should be better than a thinner panel of insulation with a much higher GFR (Rockwool: approx. 33,000Pa.s/m^2).
Questions:
• What did I do wrong??? I assumed that the worst case would be that it would not yield a significant improvement, but I never expected it to actually make the null worse!
• More specifically: Am I misinterpreting the placement of a thick mass of low GFR insulation vs. an equal (or even thinner) panel of low GFR insulation? In other words, does a thick mass of low GFR insulation only work as a corner bass trap, but somehow not as a first reflection point?
• I'm pretty stumped, so any other thoughts or insights?
Few notes:
• I later tried adding a thick MDF wall between the speakers and the R30 (to make an artificial front wall), but that made the null even worse (also unexpected) and changed the frequency slightly (not unexpected).
• The closest room mode is ~102Hz, but that does not seem to be an issue -- the null moves as expected in relation to the speaker's distance from the front wall, where 102Hz has never caused a peak or a null at my mixing position.
• I do have graphs, but I'm not at my studio computer. I will add those ASAP.
Thanks so much in advance for any help!!!
Brett