Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Discuss the studios designed by John Sayers productions

Moderators: Aaronw, John Sayers

euphioq
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:20 am

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by euphioq »

Hello. My first post here!.... the room looks great. Very tasteful. I have a question regarding the slat resonators. Did you use a formula to decide the width of your slats and the width of the gaps? I am sort of confused to how that works with the Helmholz calculator. This is really more of a general question about the Helmholz I guess (but was curious about your decision), but in thinking about the helmholz effect and how it is compared to a soda bottle and blowing over the top of it to hear a tone... if the bottle had other holes in it (or multiple openings at the top let's say) wouldn't that affect the sound? And if there were different sized openings on the bottle .... etc. The calculator says to just plug in a slat and gap width and it will tell you the freq that it is effective at absorbing. But when you have different slat and width gaps, won't they all affect each other? The calculator doesn't take the other slat and gap widths into consideration, or how many there are for that matter. I guess I've always thought a Helmholz resonator worked with a cavity and a single slot/opening.
Either way the slat resonator makes sense as an effective diffusor/absorber but I'm just wondering how useful it is to try and calculate the slat and gap widths. I'm getting ready to design a new control room and I feel myself pulling in the direction of just trying to make the slats somewhat random and aesthetically appealing. As long as the cavity is packed with absorption it will achieve the low freq absorption and with the slats reflect (and somewhat diffuse) the high freqs.
jbassino
Moderator
Posts: 728
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:37 am
Location: Santiago de Chile

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by jbassino »

Been covered a lot please read the forum
Soundman2020
Site Admin
Posts: 11938
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by Soundman2020 »

if the bottle had other holes in it (or multiple openings at the top let's say) wouldn't that affect the sound?
That's not really the acoustic equivalent of a slot resonator. It would be more like lining up several bottles of different sizes next to each other, and blowing across all of them. each will resonate at its own frequency.
But when you have different slat and width gaps, won't they all affect each other?
Not really. It is the volume of space directly behind the slot that acts as the resonator. Don't forget that air is very stiff, as far as sound is concerned: At a speed of 340 m/s, air is very solid. Ever drive at 100 km/h, and stick your hand out the car window? Imagine doing that at ten times the speed, and you get an idea of how solid air "feels" to a sound wave. So it only really "sees" the zone directly behind the slot itself, not the other zones above and below. It would be kind of like if you cut holes in the sides of adjacent bottles, and linked them together. It wouldn't change things much. In reality, a helmholtz resonator is a "mass/spring" resonator. The air in the gap between the slats acts as the mass, and the air in the cavity behind it acts as the spring.

The CORRECT equation for calculating the resonant frequency is:
F = 2160 * sqrt (r / ((d*1.2*D) * (r+w)) )

Where:
r = slot width
d = slat thickness
1.2 = mouth correction
D = cavity depth,
w = slat width
2160 = c/(2*PI) but rounded
c = speed of sound in inch/sec.

Notice that the only dimension regarding the cavity, is the depth of the cavity. It doesn't really matter how long the cavity (slot) is, and the effective volume is limited by the slot width plus the slat width. Since you normally use slats that are the same width for all of the slots, the only cavity dimension that changes the resonant frequency is the cavity depth: If you angle the slat away from the wall behind it, such that the depth changes along the slot (deeper cavity at one end of the slot, shallower at the other), then you make a broadband resonator. In effect, you can think of it as a series of several separate resonators, each with its own depth, as if you had actually made your slat into a kind of "sideways staircase", except on an infinite scale. So each tiny section of the resonator has it's own individual sharp frequency, governed only by the cavity depth immediately behind it, but when you consider all of the "steps" together, then you get a broadband resonant curve with a flat top, instead of a bell shape.

I'm not sure if I'm explaining this very well! But basically it is only the depth that governs the frequency at any give point on a slot resonator, since all of the other factors are fixed, and each portion of the sound wave only "sees" the slot and cavity right in front of it. It can't see, and is not affected by, adjacent "steps" on the resonator.
The calculator doesn't take the other slat and gap widths into consideration,
It does not need to. Each one acts on its own.
or how many there are for that matter.
Once again, It does not need to. Each slot acts on its own, independent of the others, since that portion of the sound wave that gets through the slot, only "sees" that specific width/depth of slot, and only that specific depth of cavity.

You are looking at the slot wall as an entire forest. You need to get closer, and see it as a large set of individual trees, each of which has its own characteristics. Al together they make up the forest, but each tree acts alone.
I guess I've always thought a Helmholz resonator worked with a cavity and a single slot/opening.
That's correct. But there is nothing to prevent you from putting a whole bunch of them next to each other! And you can tune them all to the same frequency if you want, or all to different frequencies, since each acts independently of the others.
I'm just wondering how useful it is to try and calculate the slat and gap widths.
Very useful! But John already did that for you with his design for a slot wall. If you stick to those dimensions, you will have a good broadband absorber that covers a wide range. If you angle it slightly, you get an even broader bandwidth, but at the expense of efficiency. You cover more frequencies, but get a lower amount of absorption for each individual frequency.
just trying to make the slats somewhat random and aesthetically appealing.
Probably not a good idea! You might end up duplicating or triplicating your coverage of certain ranges, and totally missing others.... Far better to just go with John's standard slot wall, since he has already done all the math for you, and oodles of those walls have already been built, very successfully. You might get luck with a random arrangement.. but then again, you might not. And your chances or randomly hitting on a BETTER design than John's, are about the same as your chances of winning all fifty State lotteries on the same day, then getting struck by lightning, shot, drowned and suffocated all at once, by accident! :)


- Stuart -
euphioq
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:20 am

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by euphioq »

Hey Stuart... thank you for the response. The analogy of the forest of trees helps a bundle. Apologies if a post such as mine has already been covered... I thought I had scanned good and hard for some answers, but it is probably my stubbornness to accept certain bits of science now and then. I think what confuses me is that there is an importance placed on the box to be sealed airtight. I picture all of the additional slats as air leaks in the sealed box and it kind of messes with my head.
And I will take into consideration the math for my slot gaps and widths. It makes more sense to at least try the math. I think any combination of widths, calculated or not, will look nice.
cheers
wil
severecritic
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:05 pm

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by severecritic »

i saw the photos it is amazing
if you wish i am ready to share
aswhitehead
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 12:52 pm
Location: North Carolina, USA

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by aswhitehead »

euphioq,

In response to your question on whether we calculated the slat resonator, we did not. I talked with John about board and gap widths and we just made them random within those ranges.

Scott
aswhitehead
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 12:52 pm
Location: North Carolina, USA

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by aswhitehead »

severecritic,

Thanks! We really like the room.

Scott
Johnny D
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:15 pm

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by Johnny D »

What about the costs?

How much were your costs for the whole constrution?

Greez
MunchkinBrando
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:41 pm
Location: Winterswijk, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by MunchkinBrando »

Soundman2020 wrote:
The CORRECT equation for calculating the resonant frequency is:
F = 2160 * sqrt (r / ((d*1.2*D) * (r+w)) )

Where:
r = slot width
d = slat thickness
1.2 = mouth correction
D = cavity depth,
w = slat width
2160 = c/(2*PI) but rounded
c = speed of sound in inch/sec.

Notice that the only dimension regarding the cavity, is the depth of the cavity. It doesn't really matter how long the cavity (slot) is, and the effective volume is limited by the slot width plus the slat width. Since you normally use slats that are the same width for all of the slots, the only cavity dimension that changes the resonant frequency is the cavity depth: If you angle the slat away from the wall behind it, such that the depth changes along the slot (deeper cavity at one end of the slot, shallower at the other), then you make a broadband resonator. In effect, you can think of it as a series of several separate resonators, each with its own depth, as if you had actually made your slat into a kind of "sideways staircase", except on an infinite scale. So each tiny section of the resonator has it's own individual sharp frequency, governed only by the cavity depth immediately behind it, but when you consider all of the "steps" together, then you get a broadband resonant curve with a flat top, instead of a bell shape.

- Stuart -
So basically on an angled slat resonator, given the slot and slot width is the same, the largest cavity (left side in this case) will be the start frequency and the smallest cavity the end frequency, while covering all frequencies between those start and end frequency?

Is there a link to John's standard slat resonator?
Can't seem to find it.
Nolan W
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:03 pm
Location: Charlotte NC, USA

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by Nolan W »

Really sharp looking space. It is pretty incredible that you could squeeze so much into such a limited space. Very impressive.
I like cheese.
mariosan34
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 10:27 am

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by mariosan34 »

what is the cost of building a replica argosy desk? like to have a carpenter build me one where do I get the plans from?
JLuka
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:10 am
Location: Italy

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by JLuka »

Hi Scott
all the photos in your posts seems to be deleted.
Do you have a website or similar where i can see the pics?
I'm dealing with a small attic too, it would be very helpful.

Regards
Luka
pchristy
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:55 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by pchristy »

I guess pics don't stay up long, eh? A shame, because I would love to see some of the studio elements mentioned in the posts.
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by John Sayers »

John Sayers Productions

If this site helps you build your studio please use the Donate button.
aswhitehead
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 12:52 pm
Location: North Carolina, USA

Re: Mastering/Mix Room w/Vocal Booth

Post by aswhitehead »

All pics are back up in the thread. The folder had been deleted on my server for some reason :?
Post Reply