Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2003 1:30 am
by gearmike
Sounds like a good plan.
I'll try to get a drawing together today. What if the slat (box) wall was seperated from the interior wall? Would that help?
I'll post it to barefoot's forum too...
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2003 4:56 am
by rsb
If you are using this 10ft tall box with slats on the top to accomplish absorbsion down to 80hz. Would it not be a lot less work to just build a panel trap at that point?
It seems like it would take up a lot less space and be a lot easier to work with.
Ryan
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2003 5:35 am
by gearmike
My question is partially academic and partially real world. I'm trying to figure out the physics of how these things work so I can better understand them. Panel Traps would definitely be a smaller solution, but would it absorb as much and as low?
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2003 6:38 am
by gearmike
I was just thinking...
You know how a lot of control rooms have a couch in the rear of the room raised up about 6 or 8 inches? What if instead of losing that space under the couch, it was built to be a slat resonator? I'll draw some diagrams tonight and you guys can tell me if I'm way off...