FINISHED IN 2020! Sharward's Partial Garage Conversion

Discuss studios designed and built by others.

Moderators: Aaronw, John Sayers

sharward
Moderator
Posts: 4281
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Sacramento, Northern California, USA
Contact:

Post by sharward »

knightfly wrote:You want to drum, stick with concrete - whatever flooring you put on top of it, you NEED that mass... Steve
I'm just trying to establish a "Plan B" if case it is decided that concrete is impossible.

The walls and ceiling are about 4 tons, and according to your calcs, a 6" floating concrete floor is about 5.5 tons. That's about 19,000 pounds over a 9x14"* area, or about 150 pounds per square foot -- and we know that the weight will be concentrated on the RIM blocks.

Plus, that's an :shock: empty :shock: room -- put a few guys in it with instruments and furnishings, and we're looking at adding another ton or more.

I figured the QuietWood Serenity stuff was probably at least that much.

Bottom line, realizing that concrete is superior but comes at a cost of weight, if I can't afford the weight, then I'm willing to afford the QuietWood. I guess we can consider crossing that bridge if we run into problems supporting the concrete.

*I'm figuring 9x14 because of the 5x4 chunk I had to remove from the space due to the landing requirements. Outer dimensions are roughtly 12-9-16-4-4-5.)
mikeklooster
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: stockton

Post by mikeklooster »

ya keith, thats the acheivable theory now your protected.
My problem is I think(dont know) my slab is thinner,older, and probably no rebarb(?). I have to consider this myself.
the wood floor by kenetics alone is like 60 stc, with the pricey quiet wood "should be better". Isnt that enough? isnt it like 60 stc for 100dbA?
My question is how close is this. If I(we) cant acheive ultimate isolation(concrete) is this acceptable?
What about the 3 1/2 " slab kenetics mentions on 2 models. Is this significantly lighter and how will it work?
sharward
Moderator
Posts: 4281
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Sacramento, Northern California, USA
Contact:

Post by sharward »

All great observations and questions, Mike. I'm interested in the answers too.

However, understand what STC actually means. It's an interesting number, but must not be relied upon in the context of what you and I are planning to do.

To paraphrase Steve, forget about STC -- worry about low end TL, and mid and high end TL takes care of itself. Stop bass from getting out, and you'll take care of treble at the same time.
sharward
Moderator
Posts: 4281
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Sacramento, Northern California, USA
Contact:

Crap! No Rebar!

Post by sharward »

I spoke with a neighbor two doors down (the retired gentleman with the wood shop in his garage) about his concrete floor. His floor was defective and a portion of it had to be replaced within the past couple of years.

He said his garage floor has no rebar and is at best 4" thick atop a layer of sand.

I spoke with the concrete company about this, and they're going to call me back with (hopefully) more information tomorrow morning.

Get me off this rollercoaster -- I think I'm gonna hurl. :cry:
mikeklooster
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: stockton

Post by mikeklooster »

I just had a discussion with dan hornac from tempco(kinetics). I dont know if hes was trying to buy a new pair of "new balances" on my dime, but hes recomended the RIM and was quite at ease with the weight factors. Im not gettin excited yet, but at least he was optomistic. It just seems wierd that every body here is so cautios and thorough yet the product saleman isnt worried at all. He wasnt worried about leveling(as long as not too drastic) or weight factors. That $12 a square foot can be up to $25 a square foot depending on the quantity bought. If we are both going to use this alternative maybe we should buy together, and anyone else whos in the market right now. GOOD LUCK..or maybe we should just get into kroket or watching nascar. Ive read the budwiser label long ago and feel really confident with my expertise in that world....
sharward
Moderator
Posts: 4281
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Sacramento, Northern California, USA
Contact:

Post by sharward »

mikeklooster wrote:If we are both going to use this alternative maybe we should buy together, and anyone else whos in the market right now.
I agree -- in fact, this is an area where our Northern California Gang of Studio Construction Wannabes might be beneficial -- perhaps we could co-op some of our purchases. :-)

So, here's the latest on my existing garage floor situation.

Today I spoke with a very knowledgeable manager at the concrete company that did the concrete work in my house. He said that his recollection of my subdivision is that they used 4" thick concrete atop a (minimum) 2" rock base with a 6" x 6" wire mesh for the initial phases (which includes my house), but that later phases may have upgraded to rebar.

He siad the mix was designed at 3,000 psi, but that over time my floor hardened to at least 5,000 psi.

He also said that he would not recommend more than 10,000 pounds of total weight for my room without consulting a geotechnical engineer. (Obviously, with 6,000 pounds of walls of 2,000 pounds of ceiling, an 11,000 floating floor won't fly on his word alone.)

I called one of the geotechnical engineering companies he recommended. That gentleman said a 3,000 psi mix is "pretty darn good" because most are 2,500. He estimates that my concrete floor can withstand up to 250 psf.

Bear in mind that this means, but recommended that I consult the structural engineer who worked on my subdivision.

I called the builder and obtained the name and phone number of the structural engineer. I just left voice mail over there.

So, let's do the math on what we know so far: Multiplying 250 (the psf estimate) by the square footage of the footprint of my floating floor (roughly 9' x 15') is 33,750. That's good. However, that would assume 100% contact between the floating floor and the existing concrete, which is not correct -- the RIM system has 2" square pucks on 24" centers. That means there is only 1 square inch of contact for each square foot of floating floor. That's the equivalent of about 126 square inches of weight transfer area, scattered around.

Hopefully I'll get my voice mail returned with some assurances that I'm looking for -- or, I'll learn that this thing is just way too heavy for my existing floor.

Or, perhaps a steel plate lying underneath the RIM system will help distribute the weight of the blocks over the concrete floor... But that may be problematic from an acoustical standpoint.
mikeklooster wrote:dan hornac from tempco(kinetics). . . was quite at ease with the weight factors. . . It just seems wierd that every body here is so cautios and thorough yet the product saleman isnt worried at all.
Well, I just got off the phone with him. We spoke for over 20 minutes. He said he didn't know much about construction and engineering and that "you'll have to consult with your building and engineering experts" regarding the weight limits of my existing floor.

Perhaps he misunderstood your "weight factor" concerns, thinking the concern was overloading the Kinetics product, rather than overloading your existing concrete. :?:

I found this interesting tidbit:
Portland Cement Association wrote:What is 3,000 pound concrete?

It is concrete that is strong enough to carry a compressive stress of 3,000 psi (20.7 MPa) at 28 days. Concrete may be specified at other strengths as well. Conventional concrete has strengths of 7,000 psi or less; concrete with strengths between 7,000 and 14,500 psi is considered high-strength concrete. (Source)
I just posted at Eng-Tips Forums -- hopefully I won't get tarred and feathered for crashing their party! :shock:
cadesignr
Senior Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:25 pm
Location: Oregon USA

Post by cadesignr »

I'll say this Kieth. Ain't no one gonna pull the wool over your eyes. :lol: Hope it turns out ok.
fitZ
alright, breaks over , back on your heads......
knightfly
Senior Member
Posts: 6976
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:11 am
Location: West Coast, USA

Post by knightfly »

1/2" steel plate to cover 10 x 16 would weigh 2887 pounds, at roughly $1 per pound - acoustic problems, assuming full contact with the floorl, would be nonexistent afaik... Steve

(course, your BRA would want to see a fire rating document on steel...)
sharward
Moderator
Posts: 4281
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Sacramento, Northern California, USA
Contact:

Post by sharward »

cadesignr wrote:I'll say this Kieth. Ain't no one gonna pull the wool over your eyes. :lol: Hope it turns out ok.
Thanks, Fitz... I owe all this latest grief to you for sharing your "cracked slab" experience... ;-) ...but I'll owe you big-time gratitude when I'm done with my room and my slab is still in one piece! 8)
knightfly wrote:. . . 2887 pounds, at roughly $1 per pound . . .
:shock: Jumpin' Jehosephats! :shock:
. . . acoustic problems, assuming full contact with the floor, would be nonexistent afaik.
And that would be a challenge, due to the slope and some minor peaks and valleys.

Hey, I got my first response to my thread on the Eng-Tips Forum:
A civil/environmental engineer wrote:I would have a local structural engineer look at what you are doing, because some of these loads do get high. However, for the floor, you have a distbuted load of 140 psf (which includes a 50 psf liveload)assuming you can fairly uniformly distribut the load. The walls carry an additional 300 plf. With the proper details, you should be able to transfer the load to the the floor. However, again I would run it by a local engineer
Construction on this thing will not begin anytime soon. :?
cadesignr
Senior Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:25 pm
Location: Oregon USA

Post by cadesignr »

At least you don't have to supply an environmental "impact" study.....wait a minute...wow, I guess thats what this is :shock: :lol:

fitZ
alright, breaks over , back on your heads......
mikeklooster
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: stockton

Post by mikeklooster »

. . . acoustic problems, assuming full contact with the floor, would be nonexistent afaik.
Hey, I read this last night, and I dont understand what "afaik" is supposed to be. Aint tryin to be anal but I cant see what that might be a misspelling for or abrev. for. I think your sayin metal plate bad, or is it acoustic problems would ba nonexisitant?
Dan Fitzpatrick
Senior Member
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 8:07 am
Location: Bay Area, California
Contact:

Post by Dan Fitzpatrick »

haha ... no it's not some arcane acoustical term or variety of insulation ... it just means "as far as i know" :lol:
mikeklooster
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: stockton

Post by mikeklooster »

AH! Internet lingo. I also just learned lol is lots of laughs not love. Thank you....So metal plate is good?

sincerely,
dumb ass mike
cadesignr
Senior Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:25 pm
Location: Oregon USA

Post by cadesignr »

OMG...TWO Fitzpatricks here?.... :lol: Hello Dan, Rick Fitzpatrick here..otherwise known as fitZ. My screenname is cadesignr, which is my trade. I do CAD work. Anyway, nice to meet you.

fitZ

sorry Keith.
alright, breaks over , back on your heads......
Dan Fitzpatrick
Senior Member
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 8:07 am
Location: Bay Area, California
Contact:

Post by Dan Fitzpatrick »

haha! we are taking over! :twisted:

my dad goes by fitz too, nobody can ever get his given name right (kieran)

nice to meet you too rick, i've enjoyed reading your posts

dan
Post Reply