Auratones
Moderator: Aaronw
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 3:39 am
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
Auratones
I'd like to do a speaker project along the lines of the old Auratones. These were 5" cubes with a single driver used for checking mixes on small speakers akin to small radios.
Question is: Having never taken one apart, was there any sort of filter involved or was it really just a 5" speaker in a box?
Thanks
Kevin.
Question is: Having never taken one apart, was there any sort of filter involved or was it really just a 5" speaker in a box?
Thanks
Kevin.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 4:49 am
- Location: Portland Oregon
- Contact:
Personally I've never even heard an Auratone, let alone opened one up. However, I've opened up a lot of cheap boom boxes with full range speakers and, unless it's always built into the preamp stage, they typically don’t have any sort of filter.
Madisound sells Fostex that offers a wide selection of full range drivers. http://www.madisound.com/
Thomas
Madisound sells Fostex that offers a wide selection of full range drivers. http://www.madisound.com/
Thomas
Thomas Barefoot
Barefoot Sound
Barefoot Sound
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2003 7:53 am
- Location: Denmark
I'm in the exact same situation. I feel in love with the idea and concept of the auratone (not ever having heard one)
What really sparked my ideas was when I found this driver.
http://www.ejjordan.co.uk/jx92.html
I will hopefully get a hold on these driver shortly and tell if they are
any good in a studio situation. A friend of mine (hi Doug) helped me
out with the enclosure design. We will make it go down to 45hz. Concept
of the auratone and better specs than ns10.... who knows
And the good looks doesn't hurt
http://www.creativesound.ca/details.php?model=JX92S
Regards
Jan Holm
What really sparked my ideas was when I found this driver.
http://www.ejjordan.co.uk/jx92.html
I will hopefully get a hold on these driver shortly and tell if they are
any good in a studio situation. A friend of mine (hi Doug) helped me
out with the enclosure design. We will make it go down to 45hz. Concept
of the auratone and better specs than ns10.... who knows
And the good looks doesn't hurt
http://www.creativesound.ca/details.php?model=JX92S
Regards
Jan Holm
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 4:49 am
- Location: Portland Oregon
- Contact:
Keep an eye out for the Barefoot Sound Killatone DIY project to be posted within the next couple of weeks. It's an updated variation of the limited bandwith Auratone concept.
Thomas
Thomas
Thomas Barefoot
Barefoot Sound
Barefoot Sound
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 3:39 am
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
Barefoot says:
I am currently using a pair of [crappy] computer speakers to test mixes on... The modern day "AM Sound".
Jan Holm says:
Kevin.
Is that Killatone or Kill-your-toneKeep an eye out for the Barefoot Sound Killatone DIY project
I am currently using a pair of [crappy] computer speakers to test mixes on... The modern day "AM Sound".
Jan Holm says:
That is a nice looking driver - Great frequency response. Any chance of finding something similar in the $50-$60 US range?And the good looks doesn't hurt
Kevin.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 4:49 am
- Location: Portland Oregon
- Contact:
Kevin,
The driver for my design costs $37 - about $130 total for a completed pair. I should have the prototype built and tested after this weekend. Plans and plots soon to follow.
Jan,
Yeah, SPAM IN A SHOE definitely makes some of the best full range drivers. Though, I'm not sure if they make sense for studio monitors. They're rather expensive and their sound is a bit too unique to act as "cheap references". On the other hand, they're not really good enough to pass as full fledged studio monitors either - despite what SPAM IN A SHOE says. Still, it would be interesting to see how they do.
Thomas
The driver for my design costs $37 - about $130 total for a completed pair. I should have the prototype built and tested after this weekend. Plans and plots soon to follow.
Jan,
Yeah, SPAM IN A SHOE definitely makes some of the best full range drivers. Though, I'm not sure if they make sense for studio monitors. They're rather expensive and their sound is a bit too unique to act as "cheap references". On the other hand, they're not really good enough to pass as full fledged studio monitors either - despite what SPAM IN A SHOE says. Still, it would be interesting to see how they do.
Thomas
Thomas Barefoot
Barefoot Sound
Barefoot Sound
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 3:39 am
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2003 7:53 am
- Location: Denmark
I'm going for a 3 set speaker setup. Main will probably be a JBL4412barefoot wrote:Kevin,
Yeah, SPAM IN A SHOE definitely makes some of the best full range drivers. Though, I'm not sure if they make sense for studio monitors. They're rather expensive and their sound is a bit too unique to act as "cheap references". On the other hand, they're not really good enough to pass as full fledged studio monitors either - despite what SPAM IN A SHOE says. Still, it would be interesting to see how they do.
Thomas
and then a cheap pc speaker thing. And then I'll try the SPAM IN A SHOE as a
replacement for, say ns10, which I really can't stand. I'll be making
the SPAM IN A SHOE this summer and It'll probably be half a year before I
know if it's a usefull monitor that transelates well.
Regards
Jan Holm
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 4:49 am
- Location: Portland Oregon
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 4:32 pm
Auratones
The Auratone Cubes had a 4" driver.
I have a pair of Auratone QC66's. They were Auratones version of a Yamaha NS40. These have dual 5" low f drivers, a dome midrange and a soft dome tweeter.
Auratones were great for TV/mono monitoring back in the day. If you could get a mix to happen on those, then it was happening on the TV. I grew up at a time when NS-10's were just coming onto the scene and Auratones were still used. I like them. But, I am used to them and know what it takes, like on a NS-10, to make it work.
Peerless makes a comparable driver. Check out PartsExpress. They are pretty cheap.
I have a pair of Auratone QC66's. They were Auratones version of a Yamaha NS40. These have dual 5" low f drivers, a dome midrange and a soft dome tweeter.
Auratones were great for TV/mono monitoring back in the day. If you could get a mix to happen on those, then it was happening on the TV. I grew up at a time when NS-10's were just coming onto the scene and Auratones were still used. I like them. But, I am used to them and know what it takes, like on a NS-10, to make it work.
Peerless makes a comparable driver. Check out PartsExpress. They are pretty cheap.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: Upland, CA
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:30 am
- Location: Gresham OR
- Contact: